Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Yes, bands will be backwards compatible indefinitely.

I think it's reasonable to expect Apple will continue to sell bands that fit the older watches for several years, since bands are essential to the function of the watch, unlike iPhone cases, and there are several reasons for customers to buy bands.

Whether or not the next generation watches will fit the current bands is a fun question to ponder. But thinking about what things would be like with an entirely new system of watch bands alongside the older ones makes me think they'll remain compatible for a while.
 
Historically, Apple's 2nd gen product has always been radically different from the first. One reason for this is that during the development process, there comes a point where the design has to be frozen to allow pre-production and software development, despite what they may have learned in developing the hardware along the way allowing them to do things differently. So that knowledge is immediately funneled into the second generation model.

So I disagree with your prediction, though other than historical precedent there's nothing that makes mine more accurate than yours.

That said, once the early adopters buy the watch, and let's face it, those die hard Apple enthusiasts are often the only ones who return to the trough the second year after buying the first generation models, before the product is widely adopted by the general public. So the question is, what must-have features will Apple add to the hardware? The first gen watch will most likely get all the watch OS 2 updates, so there will have to be physical changes to the watch to make early adopters of the first gen model rush out and buy the second gen. Otherwise Apple will be struggling to get more customers for it, with the "old news" of last years model, which the luminaries of the fashion industry will likewise be "over". The best way to do that is the way they always do it -- new design and/or hardware features.

It will have to be more than GPS which appeals to a limited user base. And it will have to be more than internal speed bumps, and power management to appeal to a broader public. A round watch might boost numbers from the fashion conscious, though not from the original tech guys, but it will have to offer something truly different like a camera to get general attention from the public and tech community alike.

Apple really did themselves a disservice putting everything but the kitchen sink into this model, giving themselves little room to quickly grow for the next edition. It's going to be hard to squeeze something new into the next watch it doesn't already have, which is enough to captivate the public, as well as the fashion and tech world, but that seems to be the bed they've made for themselves.

Then again, they could just rest on their laurels, change nothing about the hardware design, add a few new watchbands, speed bump the chips, and call it a day. Somehow that doesn't seem like Apple to me.

I appreciate the well worded and well thought out differing opinion. You make some very valid points.

Maybe Apple has or will have discovered the secret feature that will bump the  WATCH from "nice to have" to "need to have".
 
1. gps/lte
2. larger battery
3. better water proof

Maybe they make the sport more waterproof and let the s/s get the better battery? From reading some of the teardown it sounds like they can use smaller chips and maybe that would make way for gps/lte chip and/or a slightly larger battery which would be needed with the gps/lte
 
Maybe Apple has or will have discovered the secret feature that will bump the  WATCH from "nice to have" to "need to have".
I think the "secret feature" is the connected internet of things.

Once merchants and banks support Pay universally, and automakers support the watches ability to unlock and remote access automobiles, and hotels universally support digital locks, and they become more common in homes and businesses, and businesses, state and federal governments allow secure ID credentials to be accessed on the watch, and home security systems can be controlled through the watch, along with home automation systems which are becoming more common, as well as all the other stuff the Watch can do will make it a must have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: douglasf13
maybe they'll just release a round version and have two models to choose from. Its billed as a fashion device after all.
 
I think the "secret feature" is the connected internet of things.

Once merchants and banks support Pay universally, and automakers support the watches ability to unlock and remote access automobiles, and hotels universally support digital locks, and they become more common in homes and businesses, and businesses, state and federal governments allow secure ID credentials to be accessed on the watch, and home security systems can be controlled through the watch, along with home automation systems which are becoming more common, as well as all the other stuff the Watch can do will make it a must have.

Don't forget health data! That is after all, one of the major selling points of this thing.
 
Moonshot: touch ID on the digital crown, or better yet, if it can be figured out, directly on the display. I guess that would be a big breakthrough for the iPhone as well.

Doesn't the Galaxy S6 already have a fingerprint scanner right on the display? Apple wouldn't doing anything revolutionary to do the same, so I'd think it's possible.
 
Doesn't the Galaxy S6 already have a fingerprint scanner right on the display? Apple wouldn't doing anything revolutionary to do the same, so I'd think it's possible.

I thought this would be on the first release to be honest.
 
i mostly see hardware changes and not physical changes to the watch because the weight is less then the majority of high end watchs such as rolex which i read base models are like 5 pounds and the depth and of it and apple watch are pretty much the same so. i don't see the difference really between the apple watch ad high end watchs i see mostly software and hardware changes. also remember they can't go making this watch ultra thin like other products or it won't even look like a watch anymore
 
I seriously would love to be able to get the Apple Watch right now. I know that 2nd Gen Apple products tend to address issues associated with the 1st gen product. With that said, I don't want to spend $400 dollars on a watch if there is going to be a new product in the foreseeable future. Will there be a whole new watch, or will Apple continue to update the watch in the form of OS? Thanks!
 
There will always be a new product in the foreseeable future.

It's safe to say it won't be anytime in the rest of 2015 as they're still releasing the AW in other countries.
 
Let's say Apple Watch 2 comes out in one year, and you pay $400.

Then you're paying 'about' $33/mo for the watch if you only use it for a year and just toss it, which you probably won't.

But, bluntly, if $400 is an amount of money that you 'worry' about, need to budget for, or represents a significant purchase ... the last thing you should be buying is the Apple Watch.
 
I look for an announcement probably again in the spring. They'll price drop the first versions $50 and then come out with lte models that'll be like 80-100 more. So sport model for 299. Sport lte for 379.
 
I'll say WWDC June next year, reduce the current models in price but still sell them for 12 months. Next watch to have 16GB, thinner, larger/curved screen, better battery and hopefully dust and waterproof.
 
I reckon we won't see the Apple Watch v2.0 until late 2016 at the earliest.

Looking at the release of the AW, I'm not even sure if it's yet available WW. And don't forget that Apple just released 2 new colours last month. So in short, I would be surprised if we see an announcement anytime before September next year.

Added to this, what do I expect AW v2.0 to have....I don't think the form-factor will change that much, it will be compatible with v1 straps. Maybe a better battery life and more sensors. I see no need for a camera and will it have GPS? Not sure about that, as Apple wants the watch to be an additional/partner device to the iPhone, not a replacement and have GPS would seriously strain on the battery.

When v2.0 does get released, I expect the v1 models to reduce in price by $50 or a bit more. What I'm unsure about is the different models. We have Sports starting at $349 and then it goes up and up to over $1000, then we have the gold/rose gold versions which are mega-bucks. So maybe, just maybe we will see the exact same form-factor but with faster processor & better battery.

Or could we be looking at a 2 year cycle?
 
I reckon we won't see the Apple Watch v2.0 until late 2016 at the earliest.

Looking at the release of the AW, I'm not even sure if it's yet available WW. And don't forget that Apple just released 2 new colours last month. So in short, I would be surprised if we see an announcement anytime before September next year.

Added to this, what do I expect AW v2.0 to have....I don't think the form-factor will change that much, it will be compatible with v1 straps. Maybe a better battery life and more sensors. I see no need for a camera and will it have GPS? Not sure about that, as Apple wants the watch to be an additional/partner device to the iPhone, not a replacement and have GPS would seriously strain on the battery.

When v2.0 does get released, I expect the v1 models to reduce in price by $50 or a bit more. What I'm unsure about is the different models. We have Sports starting at $349 and then it goes up and up to over $1000, then we have the gold/rose gold versions which are mega-bucks. So maybe, just maybe we will see the exact same form-factor but with faster processor & better battery.

Or could we be looking at a 2 year cycle?

It is interesting as most people agree generation 1 models will stick around to provide a cheaper entry point in to the ecosystem. If it turned out to be a 2 year update cycle it would build good customer loyalty to the watch brand and people would get one based on device longevity.

On a practical note once it becomes clear on what Apple intends to do it is easier for people when purchasing/budgeting, i.e 1 iPhone launch a year, 1 iPad launch, 2 Mac speed refreshes etc.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.