No. There is no evidence provided so far that the chip difference matters in the PLUS phones. Only in the 6S has there been evidence shown that the TSMC chip gives better battery life.TSMC for me on my iPhone 6S Plus 128GB (Space Grey) I just bought at release here in Denmark.
Does it really matter that much which chip it is?
I am with a Samsung chip, but I still get 10 hours of usage time on my iphone 6s. Does that mean people will get 12 hours with the TSMC CHIP?????
That's a great explanation. The Samsung chip is 14nm so theoretically it should perform faster than TSMC's 16nm chip right? And it should be more efficient as well because of smaller architecture of the chip? But why is there so much more heat dissipation with it than TSMC chip?No. To obtain battery benchmark, it turns almost everything off, and mainly stresses the A9 processor to run down the battery. This is how the 2 hr difference was observed, it's kind of a worst case scenario.
There are many other components in the iPhone that drain the battery on regular daily use - screen (a big one), cell and wifi signals, camera. The fraction drawn by the processor could be small relatively. Hence, when you multiply that fraction with the benchmark difference, the net result could be only a few percent in benefit.
Bottom line is, you won't get 12 hrs of usage on a 6S with TSMC chip, based on the 10 hrs of yours with Samsung chip.
Oh god, you think he was serious? Are you an accountant?
No. To obtain battery benchmark, it turns almost everything off, and mainly stresses the A9 processor to run down the battery. This is how the 2 hr difference was observed, it's kind of a worst case scenario.
There are many other components in the iPhone that drain the battery on regular daily use - screen (a big one), cell and wifi signals, camera. The fraction drawn by the processor could be small relatively. Hence, when you multiply that fraction with the benchmark difference, the net result could be only a few percent in benefit.
Bottom line is, you won't get 12 hrs of usage on a 6S with TSMC chip, based on the 10 hrs of yours with Samsung chip.
No. To obtain battery benchmark, it turns almost everything off, and mainly stresses the A9 processor to run down the battery. This is how the 2 hr difference was observed, it's kind of a worst case scenario.
There are many other components in the iPhone that drain the battery on regular daily use - screen (a big one), cell and wifi signals, camera. The fraction drawn by the processor could be small relatively. Hence, when you multiply that fraction with the benchmark difference, the net result could be only a few percent in benefit.
Bottom line is, you won't get 12 hrs of usage on a 6S with TSMC chip, based on the 10 hrs of yours with Samsung chip.
Chipgate? I thought it was batterygate? #toomanygatesgate
Also - why does the guy making the video continually refer to Sony chips?!
And another thing - I wish people would stop pushing that unsigned app. It may be completely innocent (it may not be) but it's bad practice and completely unnecessary when there are a number of well established and trustworthy App Store apps that can give you the same information.
Is there a more trustworthy tool to determine which chip than the initial one?
I find it very interesting that the 6S Plus gets the exact same battery life with either chip.
Does it really matter that much which chip it is?
Go to :58.
thats pretty good, i would be happy with thatI'm with a Samsung 6s. Ahhhh the irony.
View attachment 591058
Why that guy keeps on saying: "Sony, sony, sony". Every other 6S+ Geekbench Battery test I have seen, TSMC have been better than Sony, *erm* Samsung.
And 3hr 30min (!) Battery score on 6S+, there sure is something messed up there. Should be much better on both.
Just got my 6S Plus, checked the chip and it a Samsung.Go to :58.
Thanks for sharing non actual real world usage data.Just got my 6S Plus, checked the chip and it a Samsung.
![]()
Outperforms both from this vid in the cpu test though. Will probably run the battery test tonight.