So, did you mix it with some Coke? That stuff is nasty unless it's mixed with something.
They don't drink scotch neat on this strange planet you're from? It is considered sacrilege on earth.
So, did you mix it with some Coke? That stuff is nasty unless it's mixed with something.
They don't drink scotch neat on this strange planet you're from? It is considered sacrilege on earth.![]()
![]()
No both are wrong choices, you don't mix scotch with anything... Not even ice!Hmm, maybe Coke was the wrong choice. Sprite might be a better choice, since it's not quite as strong a flavor.![]()
Scotch. You bunch of uppity mofos.
Bourbon. Bourbon!
They say to put a splash of water in the younger ones but I'm not sure if I should try that or not. Water kind of makes it weaker in strength of the flavours
When "they" say a splash, they really mean a few drops.
It's not supposed to dilute it by any means, just open up the flavors.
-t
True, but that doesn't apply to most of the blended scotches, as they don't have that high a malt content. (From what I've heard, the high content of the malt mixed with the water help the whisky to "open up") I tested this on a a Black Label *shudder* and indeed, it goes bitter when you add water to it. Atleast IMHO.
I would gladly smack anyone who I observed adding things (except for a few drops of water) to a Single Malt, however.
Blended muck does not belong in the same sentence as Single Malt.![]()
Its RRP is £150so do you think I should drink it? It works out as like 7.50 a dram lol (35ml) and everyones telling me to keep it as its too expensive to drink
Blended muck does not belong in the same sentence as Single Malt.If you're very serious, add the water a few drops at a time, and for anything older than 20 years be prepared to nose it for a half hour at the least.
Someone up there said irish Whiskey. While I'm a die hard single malt man, I do love Jameson. I've had Tullamore Dew, and it's god, but so smooth it has no personality, for my taste.
And I've been known to enjoy a good bourbon on occasion as well. Everything - except blended scotch - has its place.
Some of the Bushmill specialty blends (Black Bush) are pretty good as well.
I'm a Jameson fan myself, but I do like Tullamore. Some of the Bushmill specialty blends (Black Bush) are pretty good as well. I do like some single malts, but I don't like the hard core peaty stuff. I always have the feeling I'm drinking liquidified dirt.
True, but that doesn't apply to most of the blended scotches, as they don't have that high a malt content.
Hibiki 17 y.o. is a blend, and tastes better than most single malt scotches that I've tried. Hibiki isn't a 'scotch', but it's produced much like a scotch (unlike some other whisky types such as bourbon).
Who cares how much it is worth ...
They ONLY way to enjoy a Scotch is to savor it, not stare at the full, sealed bottle.
So THAT'S what I've been doing wrong all these years...![]()
Scotch. You bunch of uppity mofos.
Bourbon. Bourbon!
Santa brought me a bottle of Laphroaig (10yr) for Christmas. Yum!
To the OP - drink it. That's what Scotch is for.
The gentrification of scotch is a funny thing - wine is the traditional province of the snobbish drinker, but lately whiskey and beer have become much more fashionable than ever. The microbrew craze has led to thousands of new beers on the market, many of them "boutique" varieties that are both unusual and expensive. Scotch whiskey has always been popular, but I feel like it was more accessible in the past. Nowadays there are all sorts of superpremium Scotch varieties out there that cost ridiculous amounts of money. But, as with all spirits, if you do a little research you'll find that very good whiskey can still be had cheapish
Speaking of Bourbon, all those superpremium Bourbons on the market crack me up. When I think of Bourbon, I think of overalls, pitchforks, double-barrel shotguns, stills...NOT $200 bottles of whiskey.(Note: I prefer single malt Scotch, but I also enjoy a decent Bourbon plenty often, so I am not mocking it).