Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Would the U.S. give up the ability to regulate a foreign company that it believes is in violation of U.S. law? Of course not. The White House is asking Europe to refrain from doing something that the U.S. would never hold back from doing if the situation were reversed. Worse, it seemingly is doing this with no analysis whatsoever of the issues actually being alleged.

I get that not everyone will agree with Europe's approach to tech regulation. But it's utterly absurd for the White House to be getting involved in how Europe regulates complex technical issues in Europe.
 
_
 

Attachments

  • 1745502732055.png
    1745502732055.png
    881.4 KB · Views: 29
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: System603
The EU has a right to implement their own laws / fines but why is Apple fined based on its total earnings rather than the earnings it makes in the EU ?
Because that wouldn't be practical, sales are local, but expenses are not. Nobody knows what the true earnings are in the EU, and it's further complicated by all sorts of shenanigans to save on taxes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mw360
Would the U.S. give up the ability to regulate a foreign company that it believes is in violation of U.S. law? Of course not. The White House is asking Europe to refrain from doing something that the U.S. would never hold back from doing if the situation were reversed. Worse, it seemingly is doing this with no analysis whatsoever of the issues actually being alleged.
How do you know that they have done "no analysis whatsoever"? Because (and I really can't believe I'm typing this this) agree with the Trump administration here, and I've been analyzing and debating the DMA for over a year now. The law absolutely was targeted to hit US companies and the law will stifle innovation.

I get that not everyone will agree with Europe's approach to tech regulation. But it's utterly absurd for the White House to be getting involved in how Europe regulates complex technical issues in Europe.
If the US passed a law, after one of the main proponents of said law suggested the law should "unquestionably target only the five biggest EU firms", had repeatedly argued that the law should avoid hitting US firms, then that proponent proposed a bunch of amendments, many of which were accepted, to make sure it only applied to EU firms while giving US firms a pass, you can bet your bottom dollar the EU would be screaming bloody murder and would be trying to get involved in how the US regulated EU companies.
 
It is shocking to me how uninformed people here are. There are 40 million people out of work in China, these jobless people are staging mass protests in the streets against the CCP. Taiwan news services are reporting severe infighting in the CCP. Taiwanese professors who specialize in the study of the CCP say that indications are that Xi Jinping is in trouble. His charm tour of Southeast Asia was a disaster.

As for the EU, there needs to be a change in definitions. It isn't the European people who are invested in this extortion, it is Brussels. Brussels hates Big American Tech. Brussels was always pissed that the UK kept their finances separate of dictates for Brussels. It demanded control of the UK businesses, and exacted taxes and fines. The UK told Brussels to go pound sand. It is time the United States starts to defend American business like the EU does what is left of theirs.
 
Simple response, any vehicle manufacturer from the EU that does not allow Apple CarPlay will be fined exactly the same amount. The EU vehicle manufacturer's will provide unlimited access to the their software.
That is fine and maybe not the gotcha that is sounds.
Allow the entertainment system to share the 12V feed.
The aforementioned system can then feed audio/video into a multiplexer so that the car and stereo can use the same speakers/display.
Build in an auto power off feature to prevent battery depletion by any '3rd party' system.

Data from CarPlay is then separate from the OBD and in car CAN BUS.

Problem solved, no, "vehicle manufacturer's will provide unlimited access to the their software", in this way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: System603
“economic extortion”?

Can this White House please, at minimum, tone down the inflammatory rhetoric? I get that it’s Trump’s whole thing to an extent, but the normalization of it just feels bad.
This term has been used for decades by both parties and is accurate to what is happening here, regardless of feelings.

I assume the White House arguments go both ways, so EU companies are not exposed to tariffs? Yes?
Was the EU tariffing the united states first and for years? Yes. So why is it bad when the US responds in kind?

If US companies don't want to be fined for breaking the law, perhaps obeying the law would be a better strategy than risking it, getting caught and then having your president throw a tantrum about how it's 'not fair', like a 3 year-old who isn't allowed to a second icecream.
Just respect local laws and you don't get fined.
The law is extremely vague (intentionally so) and effectively requires Apple (and other big companies) to give their intellectual property away for free. Even as a small company I block the entire EU because of unbelievably asinine their laws are where a single PERCEIVED violation based on VAGUE and OPEN ENDED LAWS is like 300k-600k for each count.

Extortion? This is the same White House that imposed tariffs on penguins.
Please lets not be disingenuous. Heard Island and McDonald Island are part of australia, which are subject to the tariff.

WHO Does Trump think he is to complain about this, with the amount of BS he has done to the global markets with his idiotic ideas. what a total hypocrite that orange moron is.
Trump will fold. Well known for folding when he meets force, ask China they're trolling the heck out of him.
If he can find an exit ramp, he'll take the first opportunity.

Those companies need to pay tax in the country they are trading in. Period. Or go home and don't trade here. We won't miss you.

Trump is trying to crash the stock market at least 20%, causing a flight into treasuries, this will cause the fed to slash interest rates so he can refinance the debt to near 0% and cause a deflationary spiral which will lower the cost of
everything. He also intends to use tariffs as an incentive for companies to build in the US to avoid having to pay them. The Tariffs and the resulting global trade war will also force American Farmers to sell more of their goods in the US (due to retaliatory trade measures by other countries) which will directly lower the price of groceries in the US. More than 94% of all stock is owned by just 8% of the US population. Trump is literally taking money from the rich and giving it to the poor. This is why Trump is playing a game of Hokey Pokey with Tariffs. One day he has 25% Tariffs on Mexico and the next he doesn't. This is to cause extreme volatility in the markets and a desperate need and demand to flee towards treasury bonds which are much more stable but offer much lower potential return.

This is also why eggs are cheaper now than they were under Joe Biden.
1745503242076.png


So lets see, people act like the USA is a jetski, rather it is like a gigantic tanker and these changes and tariffs will take YEARS to determine if it was worth it or not.
 
It's amazing how the entire world has to look to the EU to keep gigantic corporations in check to protect consumers. The US government is basically a corrupt conduit of dirty oil & gas, disgusting processed food and evil tech companies bent on invading your privacy and keeping you locked onto their platforms.

"Make America full of monopolies again!"
 
Last edited:
That is fine and maybe not the gotcha that is sounds.
Allow the entertainment system to share the 12V feed.
The aforementioned system can then feed audio/video into a multiplexer so that the car and stereo can use the same speakers/display.
Build in an auto power off feature to prevent battery depletion by any '3rd party' system.

Data from CarPlay is then separate from the OBD and in car CAN BUS.

Problem solved, no, "vehicle manufacturer's will provide unlimited access to the their software", in this way.
The EU doing exactly the same, requiring any developer access to Apple Critical systems. The iPhone will not crash your car. However, could drain your bank account.
 
The tariff on penguins was purposely misreported. The tariffs on Australia were expanded to include the Heard and McDonald Islands, which are Australian possessions. The reason for this is that China is very good at finding loopholes to get around tariffs. China, seeing that there were no tariffs on these 2 islands only inhabited only by nesting penguins. would use them to launder Chinese-made products through them, concealing their actual origin. The exports from these 2 islands would not get physically within 7,000 miles of them.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.