Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I find it funny how people are looking to 4g when 3G is not even available in many areas; and 3G is over 10 years old. As for 4G "technology" well the ITU was clearly paid off, but they did say that 4g would be 100mbps; sounds like alot but when 3G was first released 1MBPS sounded impossible. The problem with the"4G" currently available is that, A. it eats battery, B. Many of the percs are already available for GSM 3G, last unless your sitting in the tower majority of people will waste battery on 4g with the speed of 3G. Basicly the companies brought over the benefit of GSM 3G to CDMA phones and just labelled it 4G to get more attention
 
T mobile doesn't really have 4g. Hspa+ is not 4g. That's the same as what AT&T has in my area and it's labeled (correctly) 3G
 
t-mobiles 4g is 3g. and i hope they get law suits cause of it. sprint has a small wimax (spelling?) network. and vz doesnt have a phone on their 4g.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.