Speaking as an ordinary forum participant, rather than as a moderator, one thing I think improves the quality of a question is to describe what has already been tried. That is, assume the first question asked will be "What have you tried?", and provide that information in the initial post.
For example, if you've googled it and found conflicting answers, then describe what you tried. Don't just say "I googled it and found conflicting answers". That's not a description of what you tried. Instead, give the search terms you actually used (multiple sets if you made multiple searches), the search engine (because it may be relevant), and if there were conflicts in the results, post a couple example URLs that show the conflict. In other words, post as if someone else wanted to exactly replicate what you did.
Sometimes the problem is that poor search terms were used, but no one else will know what the search terms were unless they're posted.
Sometimes the problem is that good search terms yield poor, conflicting, or ambiguous results. No one else will know what those results were unless they can replicate the search using the same terms.
When I post an answer that I found by searching, I show the search terms I used, along with the URL of where I found the answer. If I tried more than one search or search engine, I'll list them all. Sometimes I'll also explain why I chose those particular search terms, or what key word was used to narrow the search to produce a useful result. This isn't to show off my amazing search skills, but to describe what I tried and where it led.
Back when this site got a lot more programming questions, it wasn't uncommon for someone to post a short question, and then go through about a half dozen "Did you try X?", "Yes, I did", "Well, how about Y?", "Yup, tried that too", "Which OS and Xcode version?", "Oh, it was NN and MM", and so on. This not only wastes time going back and forth, but it makes it harder to see what's already been tried, because the information is spread out across many posts, rather than being succinctly summarized up front.