No one here is whining except you. I don't think you even realize what you're saying to be honest.
no i just posted my opinion you just seems to be taking it that way.
No one here is whining except you. I don't think you even realize what you're saying to be honest.
No one here is whining except you. I don't think you even realize what you're saying to be honest.
Considering how little I use my phone as a phone I would certainly scoop up a phone capable mini as my primary device.
IMO the reason why most of the Androids being used out there don't have massive screens is because a lot of them belong to kids, moms, old folk etc who just buy an Android instead of a feature phone because no one sells feature phones anymore. Most Androids are not high end, remember. Most of them cost less than $500 and look like this:
I'd like to see some 3.5"-4" (normal sized) Androids that are high end and are comparable to the iPhone.
Price doesn't make a phone better than another. And remember, Apple is selling plenty of iPhone 4S and giving away the 4 for free with contract.
Yes - However the quality of most of these low to mid-ranged 3.5"/4" Android phones isn't nearly as good as even the iPhone 4S. This is because they're not designed to be high-end, flagship-quality phones, like the iPhone. They're designed to be a cheaper alternative to the pricey flagship Androids, such as the GS4, HTC1, Note2 etc. I have yet to see any modern 3.5" or 4" Android phone that gets anywhere near the quality of the iPhone OR the larger-screened Androids.
As others have indicated, these statistics are largely meaningless because the vast majority of the 3.5-4.3" phones are cheap Android devices, the sort of devices that people get for $0 with a contract or $99 without a contract. If you were to look at only devices with a non-contract price of $400 or higher, which is where Apple makes its money, the numbers would look more like this:The tech bloggers, pundits, analysts, and many MR forum posters keep insisting that phablets are all the rage and Apple has missed the boat. We keep hearing that Apple is doomed because everyone has moved to large screens. Well let's see what Google's own data says about the breakdown of Android devices by screen size:
Screen size - market share
--------------------------------
Small (2"-3.5") - 9.5%
Normal (3.5"-4.3") - 79.9%
Large (4.3"-7") - 5.7%
XLarge (greater than 7") - 4.9%
Source: http://developer.android.com/about/dashboards/index.html (as of April 24,2013)
That's probably a bit pessimistic. However, I agree that there is significant downside risk to AAPL -- maybe to $350 -- if Apple sticks with the 4.0" screen for the next year and unveils/enters no new product categories in that time. The U.S. market is now fairly saturated with iPhones, which means Apple depends on upgrades to generate much of its profit. A significant percentage of iPhone 5 users will not upgrade until Apple releases a larger phone.That is a billion dollar question...
iPhone sales are progressively falling, against manufacturers like Samsung.
Why ? Because Apple is still in "lala land" thinking that that puny 4 inch screen does the job and releasing major updates only once in two years.
Bringing in yet another "S" iPhone this fall, with the same screen size will definitely mean FALL (FAIL) for Apple.
$250 for share by next Feb?! Lucky I don't own any, not so sure about the sentiments among the shareholders though ...
To the OP,
Why not a larger iPhone. I am sure we are going to see multiple sizes available and it will not hurt if they add a larger phone.
Would Apple double up on iPhone manufacturing to offer a larger-screen iPhone in addition to to the 4" phone? Seems like a big risk to take.
Actually, those voices where louder before iPhone 5 and the iPad mini.
The iPhone 5 is big enough to make everything you'll expect from a mobile. Yet small enough to be perfectly portable and unobtrusive.
The iPad mini is small enough to be convenient, but large enough to be used as a tablet.
I can only talk about myself and my own experience. I usually don't browse while on the go, perhaps an occasional webpage or two. Therefore the only real gain that I got with the 4" display is a couple of extra rows on my tweetbot TL.
On the other hand, the iPad mini is big enough to display webpage in a way that I am actually used to.
I don't quite understand how is it better to have a bigger phone, which is harder to carry around, but not quite nice as a Tablet. Perhaps for women who carry a bag everywhere and for really really big men. But for an average 5"10 (like myself) the size seems right.