Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The late 60s with muscle cars was the pinnacle of automotive design imoView attachment 2624828

As for current design. You should also include modern safety features such as collapsible/deforming bumpers and crumple zones as additional reasons for generic designs

Except that area where the headlights are was a huge source of drag. Which is why this existed:

1777384427156.png
 
Your Fiat was prettier imo.

Which Fiat was that?

I must say that I rather liked the attractive Fiat Coupe (with the colour-coded dash) of the 1990s.
More classical, what strikes me most is how computerization as turn what was relatively simple, pure feeling into technological monsters, while I acknowledge this is an emotional, romantic view.

IMG_0214.jpeg

1982 Fiat Spider
I originally had a ‘71 Fiat Spider which I regarded as exceptionally beautiful as compared to average vehicles produced in the US back then. Of note, it was the same price as a Corvette although, ‘60s Vettescwere ptpretty mighty, this was prettier than the ‘71 Vette. The 60s were slipping away.

IMG_0213.jpeg
 
Last edited:
More classical, what strikes me most is how computerization as turn what was relatively simple, pure feeling into technological monsters, while I acknowledge this is an emotional, romantic view.

View attachment 2625522
1982 Fiat Spider
I originally had a ‘71 Fiat Spider which I regarded as exceptionally beautiful as compared to average vehicles produced in the US back then. Of note, it was the same price as a Corvette although, ‘60s Vettescwere ptpretty mighty, this was prettier than the ‘71 Vette. The 60s were slipping away.
Oh, yes.

Glorious.

That Fiat Spider is absolutely gorgeous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huntn
The front ends on most vehicles are too tall/wide and grotesque today. Same with gaudy/blinding tail lights too!

The manufacturers copy each other's ugly designs which is the ultimate form of something other than flattery
…massive prominent grills. 🤔
 
I saw this discussion on reddit a few times before and the consensus was people didn't want cars that would stand out on the road because they didn't want people recognizing them. Lest they be the target of revenge for some kinda road rage or something? IDK.

My cars are not that generic lol 😀
 
My first car was a 3-door (never liked that counting system, unless the Italians often traveled in the boot!), beige 900cc Fiat 127.

I have very fond memories of that car. Extremely easy to maintain, and part of me wishes I still had it. Don’t think it’d pass any modern safety standards though.
 
Yeah…modern cars are electric cars being SUV’s, styled for aerodynamics, weighing 2 tons, and stuffed with electronic gadgets.

Basically I see hardly any difference anymore between a Tesla, Audi, Kia, BYD, <insert a new Chinese brand>, etc.
You still have electric cars that are electric version of “classic sedans”, but a dying breed it seems.
 
Yeah…modern cars are electric cars being SUV’s, styled for aerodynamics, weighing 2 tons, and stuffed with electronic gadgets.

Basically I see hardly any difference anymore between a Tesla, Audi, Kia, BYD, <insert a new Chinese brand>, etc.
You still have electric cars that are electric version of “classic sedans”, but a dying breed it seems.
A big part of that is people wanting a vehicle that can do everything. The concept of renting something for use cases you would rarely encounter seems to be a foreign concept for most people.
 
The front ends on most vehicles are too tall/wide and grotesque today. Same with gaudy/blinding tail lights too!

The manufacturers copy each other's ugly designs which is the ultimate form of something other than flattery
Front ends have to be tall by law in the UK and many other places. It gives pedestrians a better survival rate in a collision.

So I think it’s less copying more working within the constraints.

That said I think my BMW i3s has one of the more unique shapes on the road. Pity they discontinued it.
 
It is the interior that is important to most consumers now I think. I know that is more what I care about, I want comfort and features that are aesthetically pleasing and comfortable. I honestly don't care a whole lot what the outside looks like of the car as I don't see it when driving.
 
  • Like
Reactions: adrianlondon
It is the interior that is important to most consumers now I think. I know that is more what I care about, I want comfort and features that are aesthetically pleasing and comfortable. I honestly don't care a whole lot what the outside looks like of the car as I don't see it when driving.
Agreed. Personally I can’t abide shinny black plastic in a car interior.
Mine has leather and wood.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scepticalscribe
Front ends have to be tall by law in the UK and many other places. It gives pedestrians a better survival rate in a collision.

Reference for what you are describing? I've read just the opposite, so, either I'm confused, or, we are not talking about the same thing.
 
Reference for what you are describing? I've read just the opposite, so, either I'm confused, or, we are not talking about the same thing.
Nope because I was going from memory and apparently it is the opposite as you say.

However it offers better protection for the occupants which I think is what I was remembering. (see below)

Yes, car bonnets (hoods) have become higher on average in recent years, but while this design shift can offer enhanced safety for the vehicle's own occupants, it significantly increases the risk to pedestrians and cyclists. The average bonnet height in new European cars increased from 76.9 cm in 2010 to 83.8 cm in 2024, a trend largely driven by the popularity of SUVs.
www.transportenvironment.org
www.transportenvironment.org +2
Impact on Safety
  • Passenger Safety (Higher): Higher, more blunt front ends often provide more space between the hood and the hard engine components underneath, allowing for better energy absorption in a crash. This design often creates a stronger, more rigid structure that can improve occupant safety.
  • Pedestrian Safety (Lower): High-fronted vehicles are significantly more dangerous to vulnerable road users. A 10 cm increase in bonnet height (e.g., from 80 cm to 90 cm) raises the risk of pedestrian death by 27%. High bonnets strike pedestrians higher up—near the core, pelvis, or head—rather than the legs, increasing the likelihood of being knocked forward and run over.
  • Visibility: Taller bonnets create larger blind spots for drivers, making it difficult or impossible to see children directly in front of the vehicle.
    Reddit
    Reddit +6
 
  • Like
Reactions: BSDnostalgia
The average bonnet height in new European cars increased from 76.9 cm in 2010 to 83.8 cm in 2024, a trend largely driven by the popularity of SUVs.
I think it's partially driven by the increasing engine sizes. Full sized trucks in 'Merica are now offering 6 liter V8 and bigger because...bragging rights.🙄 Bigger engine needs more room. Since they can't make the car wider, they making them taller.
 
I think it's partially driven by the increasing engine sizes. Full sized trucks in 'Merica are now offering 6 liter V8 and bigger because...bragging rights.🙄 Bigger engine needs more room. Since they can't make the car wider, they making them taller.
Maybe in the states. My bonnet just has somewhere extra to store stuff. Most of the world can’t afford to feed a V8. Not at our prices (which is double yours).
 
Maybe in the states. My bonnet just has somewhere extra to store stuff. Most of the world can’t afford to feed a V8. Not at our prices (which is double yours).
I think it's partially driven by the increasing engine sizes. Full sized trucks in 'Merica are now offering 6 liter V8 and bigger because...bragging rights.🙄 Bigger engine needs more room. Since they can't make the car wider, they making them taller.
Actually no. Due to the emissions (which are rolling back) turbo 4 cylinders are the norm. Look at toyota 4runner and tacoma 4 cyclinder turbo (some with hybrids); GM trucks have 4 cyclinder options; and ford are (2.3 cyclinder with v6 turbo). V8 WERE dead until trump watered down the emissions regulations. All of a sudden V8 are back but that just recent, 2025. Jeep for example was normally a v6, it had v8 but it was discontinued (I think 2023). But with the recent watering down of emission the v8 is back again. The JL my model year was common to have 4 cylinter turbo with the v6 being the old enging and hard to find on the delater lot.

Soooooo what I am saying is the big front end of trucks and SUV is mostly empty space. Its more aesthetics over function really. Check the engine bay its big open spaces in there. The big front end is not needed to fit the small engine.

Now with the watering down of emissions we will see when the big v8 are back with new designed coming out.

But this current Iran war geopotical strategiest now envision long term effects of oil (and food) prices (that's a long post) and that may cause engines sizes to go down permanently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheIntruder
Actually no. Due to the emissions (which are rolling back) turbo 4 cylinders are the norm. Look at toyota 4runner and tacoma 4 cyclinder turbo (some with hybrids); GM trucks have 4 cyclinder options; and ford are (2.3 cyclinder with v6 turbo). V8 WERE dead until trump watered down the emissions regulations. All of a sudden V8 are back but that just recent, 2025. Jeep for example was normally a v6, it had v8 but it was discontinued (I think 2023). But with the recent watering down of emission the v8 is back again. The JL my model year was common to have 4 cylinter turbo with the v6 being the old enging and hard to find on the delater lot.

Soooooo what I am saying is the big front end of trucks and SUV is mostly empty space. Its more aesthetics over function really. Check the engine bay its big open spaces in there. The big front end is not needed to fit the small engine.

Now with the watering down of emissions we will see when the big v8 are back with new designed coming out.

But this current Iran war geopotical strategiest now envision long term effects of oil (and food) prices (that's a long post) and that may cause engines sizes to go down permanently.
I switched to a full EV 5 years ago. Switched Mrs AFB earlier this year. I’m done with ICE for good.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.