I agree with the original poster that the screen size is an issue, it would be very difficult for me to get my work done on such a small screen.
But that is one of those specs you got to know if it is limitomg you without even touching that laptop… right? Riiight??I agree with the original poster that the screen size is an issue, it would be very difficult for me to get my work done on such a small screen.
If you want to downsize from the 15" MBA, the 14" MBP might feel similarly big. I had one for three years (the M1 Max), and it feels very dense and I never liked carrying it around. Once I moved to a desktop + laptop setup, I got a Studio for home and an M4 13" MBA for travel and it is so much better to carry around than the 14" MBP. It doesn't seem like it would be a big difference, but for me, it was. It might be fine for you, but what the 14" loses in footprint compared to the 15" MBA it gains in bulk. Anyway, just a thought. Thanks for sharing your experience with the Neo!Outside of work I have a MBA 15” M3. It is too big and I want a 13” Macbook. My partner is going to get the 15” MBA for doing video and photo editing and I will replace it with a 13” Macbook. I wanted to first try the Neo, and that has now ended in a return. Likely I will get a MBA 13” M5 or 14” MBP M5.
Had the Neo in the house since Friday. My initial testing concluded, the Neo is twice as capable as my 2017 base spac 13“ Touch Bar MacBook Pro. Fewer ports, no backlit keyboard and no haptic trackpad are the only notable differences between the Neo and my pos WhackBook Pro. Apart from that the Neo is twice the Mac that 2017 disappointment was.I can't imagine the Neo being anywhere as bad as my Linux ThinkPads, or my 2016 and 2020 MacBook Pro.
Or… shudder… Apple should allow you to scale the macOS interface like they do for the iOS interface.Oh, I agree.
Apple has cut their panel costs on all of the Macbooks and pivoted to just using scaling.
Given the premiums they charge (other than the new Neo), really we should be upset that they aren't putting higher resolution panels in the machines so the user can get perfect 2X Retina without sacrificing space in the UI.
When I checked out the Neo at the Apple store a couple days ago it was right next to the air, I even showed my mother the difference in screen size (she’s considering the neo for her next laptop) by putting the neo right on top of the air…At BESTBUY, they have a citrus right next to an Air. At the Apple store, Apple won’t do that.
The Max brightness on the Neo is fine, but next to the Air in a brightly lit store, it looks weak. I tested and you need to take the Air down 2 button presses from Maximum to match the Neo screen. Then they both look good.
Also, I am tall, and there is a slight viewing angle loss from above when on those desks. But that’s not how you use a laptop.
What I noticed is the thing is SMALL! All these people lamenting it isn’t small enough and want a 12” haven’t seen one. It’s tiny. Too small for me. But fine for kids and a cardasian.
The thing that will hinder it, and I didn’t believe it before yesterday, is lack of TOUCH. All the competing models in this range have 2-in-1 screens. My 12 year son was with me. He was BEGGING me to get him a replacement chrome book with a touch screen. Begging. He only wants that feature.
Right? Some people here act like they’ll never be able to sleep again if they don’t convert strangers on the internet to subscribe to their exact thinking.This thread is fun. Someone wanted to see if the Neo would work for them. Tried it out, found it didn’t meet their needs and returned it.
This is apparently a craven, immoral act.
It is a matter of fact because that is my experience. I have never said that someone else’s experience if different than mine is invalid.I think a little of it is poster that come on here and state opinions as if it were matter of fact.
For me it’s not so much the screen but the whole device. I had iBooks, but with 4:3 screens and larger bezels so the hand rest area was sufficient.But that is one of those specs you got to know if it is limitomg you without even touching that laptop… right? Riiight??
You basically claimed the viewing angles were as bad as an lcd calculator though as if that was fact. That even moving your eyes was a problem.It is a matter of fact because that is my experience. I have never said that someone else’s experience if different than mine is invalid.
The Neo screen is 100% worse than my Air and Pro to the point where it’s not usable, FOR ME.
Overall, this adds up to why this Max Tech guy says, as he compares the Neo to a MacBook Air screen:
- It does not support P3, but rather, it's just a sRGB panel. That means it is unable to show a larger array of colours.
- No white balance adjustment.
- 60 Hz refresh rate.
- Lower contrast.
- Lower anti-reflectivity coating.
- Importantly, and most significantly, the Neo screen is not laminated. That means there is an air gap between the outer glass and the underlying LCD, which is the reason I saw distortions. Delaminated screens are like taking a piece of glass and hovering it above a page of a book in a lit room: it can create distortions of the content, particularly if viewed from slight angles and the air gap traps light, slightly washing out the screen.
"It's a big difference. Honestly this [the Neo] makes the Air screen look like an OLED. We did not EXPECT this big of a difference"
I think, therefore I make sense...
Had the Neo in the house since Friday. My initial testing concluded, the Neo is twice as capable as my 2017 base spac 13“ Touch Bar MacBook Pro. Fewer ports, no backlit keyboard and no haptic trackpad are the only notable differences between the Neo and my pos WhackBook Pro. Apart from that the Neo is twice the Mac that 2017 disappointment was.
No amount of arguing, pushback, accusations, etc. will change the fact that THE NEO FAILED MY EXPECTATIONS.
But the not-so-fine print says "anyone who qualifies" and I don't think some of the folks in the Neo thread have the cash or credit (I'm kidding!) to qualify for the 1980s style test drive. 😉That’s the hole point on Apple's return policy. Right?
You tried, you don’t like it. Return it.
Back in the 80’s Apple published a very nice ad about it.
View attachment 2614186
But the not-so-fine print says "anyone who qualifies" and I don't think some of the folks in the Neo thread have the cash or credit (I'm kidding!) to qualify for the 1980s style test drive. 😉
Great point.Well, at least it's only $600 in 2026.
Do you mean, people are retuning neos because they can’t afford the credit card bill?But the not-so-fine print says "anyone who qualifies" and I don't think some of the folks in the Neo thread have the cash or credit (I'm kidding!) to qualify for the 1980s style test drive. 😉
No, it was just a joke regarding the Apple ad that mentions you need to qualify for an overnight Macintosh test drive back in the 1980s while now Apple offers a 14-day return policy no questions asked even for Mac Pros and Vision Pros. The fact that we at Macrumors have spent 16 pages of back and forth discussion about returning a $500-$600 product to a trillion dollar corporation is amusing to me.Do you mean, people are retuning neos because they can’t afford the credit card bill?
I’m not sure if I got it.
Oh they are all going up. I bet we pay 50 to 100% more within about 18 months.You may want to re-consider returning it. Laptop prices in general are expected to sky rocket this year. Wouldn't surprise me if Apple jacked up the price. Get the Neos while they're still selling at this bargain price.