Thanks crw. Unfortunately, my email doesn't appear to be the same as yours.
Mine's entitled, "iMac Pro. The news you’ve been waiting for."
Mine has the same title. See the "Add to calendar" link at the bottom on mine.
Thanks crw. Unfortunately, my email doesn't appear to be the same as yours.
Mine's entitled, "iMac Pro. The news you’ve been waiting for."
Mine has the same title. See the "Add to calendar" link at the bottom on mine.
View attachment 741704
I'm aiming for the 10-core, 64GB RAM and 16GB Vega. Hoping it costs £6.5K at most, but I have a feeling that it may be £7.5K instead.
That's the same configuration I want to get. I am hoping for $7K USD but I expect it will be $8K USD (about $1,000 each for the 8 core->10 core, 32GB -> 64GB, and Vega 56/8->64/16 upgrades).
and then releases them in 1440p
This is a Safari limitation, if you watch his videos in Chrome, they play in 4K
Do you think the jump in GPU will be so great? I was thinking that the jump from 8 to 10-core will definitely be £1000, as well as the RAM, but the Mac Pro upgrade of the GPU is only £180? I thought the GPU upgrade would be a maximum of £300?
Even so, you'd suspect that the two people who have made YouTube videos for the iMac Pro would have been more informative. Vincent Laforet actually drops test results - he's actually a full time professional using real world items to a degree.
These other two YouTubers created really uninformative videos and basically just made another spec video - absolute waste of time. I get that they have an audience, but to have one make a tech setup is a complete waste of time - his iMac Pro didn't even need to be running - he just wanted to touch it and embrace it a little too much. Meanwhile, the other guy drops RED 8K footage into it and doesn't test the machine with anything else... not that helpful considering most of us don't operate REDs, and if we did, we'd have purpose built machines and be running a video empire.
They could have given the iMac Pro to much better individuals. Great to see Vincent getting his time with the machine and great to see such an informative post from him, though his iMac wasn't running with an SSD.
Maybe Apple doesn't want this in the hands of people like Joema2? They would actually release the facts on this machine.
After reading Vincent's post, I'm definitely moving to an Optimised Media workflow. I'm just going to need to have a little clear up of my edit drive.
I was encouraged by Vincent's video. I would like to see some more hands-on reviews before finalizing my configuration.
That would be my ideal. Problem is, once you've decided to pay that much, what's a thousand or two more?!!Sounds wise, driftless. The benchmark tests show a considerable improvement between the 8 and 10-core and I've been waiting for too long to wait any longer. I just hope I can spring for the 64GB RAM, along with the 16GB Vega and 10-core. It'll be interesting to see the costings for the updates. I don't think they're going to be cheap.
These other two YouTubers created really uninformative videos and basically just made another spec video - absolute waste of time. I get that they have an audience, but to have one make a tech setup is a complete waste of time - his iMac Pro didn't even need to be running - he just wanted to touch it and embrace it a little too much. Meanwhile, the other guy drops RED 8K footage into it and doesn't test the machine with anything else... not that helpful considering most of us don't operate REDs, and if we did, we'd have purpose built machines and be running a video empire.
That would be my ideal. Problem is, once you've decided to pay that much, what's a thousand or two more?!!
I think I'm pushing the limit of my budget by upgrading to 16GB Vega and 10-Core, so I'm not so sure that splurging for the 64GB RAM will make sense given that the extra 32GB might not be massively benefitical for FCPX alone and some Motion work?
How much RAM do you have now? And how much is being used during your work?
Are you running into limits?
I don’t believe so, but I’m switching to a new workflow of using Optimised Media and I have read that FCPX will take up more RAM if it’s available, but it has no white paper, so it’s hard to know what it utilises.
I currently have 16GB RAM, but it does struggle when I add iTunes into the mix. I’d rather “future proof” the iMac Pro as much as possible by adding 64GB RAM, but ultimately it comes down to budget.
I do think it’d be wise to go that extra stretch though. What would you do?
Looks like it depends on the mail app.Mine has the same title. See the "Add to calendar" link at the bottom on mine.
View attachment 741704
I don’t believe so, but I’m switching to a new workflow of using Optimised Media and I have read that FCPX will take up more RAM if it’s available, but it has no white paper, so it’s hard to know what it utilises.
I currently have 16GB RAM, but it does struggle when I add iTunes into the mix. I’d rather “future proof” the iMac Pro as much as possible by adding 64GB RAM, but ultimately it comes down to budget.
I do think it’d be wise to go that extra stretch though. What would you do?
For me, it's also about what upgrades will push delivery time back. I'm no FCP X expert and that's what I'm really getting this Mac for. Can't seem to get a definitive answer on RAM, everybody just says more is better. Normally I would just pop in more RAM after a couple of years, hard to do all this upfront knowing Apple will take the p*ss with RAM prices and without knowing what all the other upgrades will cost.
It might be $1,000 to go from the standard 32GB to 64GB. So I guess it would depend on how much benefit you'd get from adding another 1/5th to the cost of the base iMac Pro.
You're right about "futureproofing" though... since you can't add RAM later!
I just watched a Youtube video testing various amounts of RAM in an iMac running FCPX... 8GB, 16GB, 24GB, 32GB
He was testing exporting a sequence of multiple 4K clips with LUTs and filmgrain.
After 24GB... there was no improvement in export times. 32GB was basically the same. Playback and overall "smoothness" was fine too.
So I would imagine 64GB wouldn't be any different either.
His video is a couple years old at this point though... and I'm not sure what types of files you are working with.
£1,000 for 64GB RAM seems to be expected.