Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I've already been credited with 10min of exercise towards my ring at 8:45am and I only put on my watch at 7:10. All i've done so far is get dressed, eat some toast and drive to work.

the exercise rings are a joke
If you gain exercise credit too easily or it requires more than what you believe is necessary, its because your calibration data is probably inaccurate. Everything boils down to the calibration data of the device. That is what determines your workout heart rate range, your arm swing/stride and so on. So if you are easily getting minutes, then it believes your stride is too short and its getting messed up.
 
If you gain exercise credit too easily or it requires more than what you believe is necessary, its because your calibration data is probably inaccurate. Everything boils down to the calibration data of the device. That is what determines your workout heart rate range, your arm swing/stride and so on. So if you are easily getting minutes, then it believes your stride is too short and its getting messed up.

I don't know about that. I use my watch for multiple runs per week both indoor on a treadmill and outdoor and it is typically very accurate for distance.
 
I don't know about that. I use my watch for multiple runs per week both indoor on a treadmill and outdoor and it is typically very accurate for distance.
It is probably the driving. The vibration and movement of the steering wheel can often look like 'exercise' activity to the accelerometer. This used to be a big problem back in wOS 1 but the algorithms should be better about identifying and filtering out driving vs exercise types movements.

Calibration is manly about learning your stride length x cadence per mile (kilo) to more accurately estimate speed, distance and caloric burn when walking or running without GPS. Since you run often outside yours is calibrated and it continues to dynamically calibrate each time you do an outdoor run (iPhone needed if a S0/S1).
 
Read my edit. I proved all this as not necessary in how the Apple Watch counts exercise. Apple Watch ONLY uses the heart rate monitor when a workout is running. So by your logic, it would NEVER give exercise minutes unless a workout was running. Therefore your entire individual stats is 100% incorrect in how the Apple Watch counts exercise credit.

When a workout is NOT running, it has to rely on speed/pace of a brisk walk. NOTHING else. Because there is nothing else to check.

EDIT:

We've been down this road before so I will just start posting my old posts: #49

"Every full minute of movement that equals or exceeds the intensity of a brisk walk counts toward your daily Exercise and Move goals. For wheelchair users, this is measured in brisk pushes. Any activity below this level counts only toward your daily Move goal.

Make sure that you earn Exercise credit during walks by allowing the arm with your Apple Watch to swing naturally. For example, while walking your pet, let the arm with your watch swing freely while the other holds the leash.

If you need both hands while walking, for example to push a stroller, you can still earn Exercise credit by using the Workout app. The Activity app relies on arm motion and an accelerometer to track movement, but the Workout app can use the accelerometer, a heart rate sensor, and the GPS on your iPhone if you carry it with you. Open the Workout app on your Apple Watch, tap Outdoor Walk, and bring your iPhone on the walk."

https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204517


So AGAIN. NON-workouts, use accelerometer to track your speed and pace. NOT heart rate. Therefore there MUST be a minimum speed. Apple has said its 3MPH. Believe it or not.

I will end with this as I need to study for finals. Take it or leave it, but Apple has made it very clear.

I wholeheartedly disagree with the 3mph information you have been given. My partner is having the same problem with her watch. We go for a brisk walk together and I get credit she doesn't. I have been doing extensive testing trying to solve this one including wearing both watches myself. I went for a gentle walk and my watch gave me exercise credits whilst her watch didn't. It has something to do with her personal biometrics. It doesn't even award her for intense training at the gym.

What every apple have told you about 3mph min speed is rubbish. If a 100 year old wore one and walked at a slow pace their max heart rate would register as intense activity and be classed as exercise.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Julien
I wholeheartedly disagree with the 3mph information you have been given. My partner is having the same problem with her watch. We go for a brisk walk together and I get credit she doesn't. I have been doing extensive testing trying to solve this one including wearing both watches myself. I went for a gentle walk and my watch gave me exercise credits whilst her watch didn't. It has something to do with her personal biometrics. It doesn't even award her for intense training at the gym.

What every apple have told you about 3mph min speed is rubbish. If a 100 year old wore one and walked at a slow pace their max heart rate would register as intense activity and be classed as exercise.
You missed the entire point of my argument. The speed is only required, again only, if you are not running a workout. If you are not running a workout - prior to watchOS 4 on newer watches, heart rate was not monitored (and even now, its limited to specific workouts). Therefore, it could not account for an increase in heart rate. Its clearly bolded and underlined above. WatchOS 4.0 changed this.

You are responding to a 1yr old, now out of date post.
 
Last edited:
I have intentionally walked at 2.5mph on several occasions to verify. Guess what, didn't get any credit.
Seems a case of confirmation bias. Your logic also appears based on circular reasoning.

The point of exercising isn't to keep a minimum speed, but rather to actually exercise. So it would be stupid to enforce a minimum speed, especially seeing as some people are disabled or elderly and decrepid by age, and could not necessarily keep an arbitrarily chosen minimum speed.
 
Seems a case of confirmation bias. Your logic also seems based on circular reasoning.

The point of exercising isn't to keep a minimum speed, but rather to actually exercise. So it would be stupid to enforce a minimum speed, especially seeing as some people are disabled or elderly and decrepid by age, and could not necessarily keep an arbitrarily chosen minimum speed.
As mentioned in my previous post - this is a 1 year old and out-dated thread. Apple changed the mechanics in watchOS 4.0.

But to address your point - all you have to do is run a workout via the workout app. The minimum speed is for non-workouts only. That is outlined in great detail in this thread including references from Apples (old) support page - because this no longer applies.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.