In Activity Monitor? That’s 32TB since your last reboot, not 32TB over the life of the machine.
Thanks for assuming I incorrectly read the data. No, it's from DriveDX
In Activity Monitor? That’s 32TB since your last reboot, not 32TB over the life of the machine.
Thanks for assuming I incorrectly read the data. No, it's from DriveDX
For power users though - if you have a 1 TB SSD with a TBW of 500, you could burn through that incredibly quickly (in a year or two) if you hit swap a lot.
Indeed. I watched all of this, and was enlightened / encouraged.There have been lots of discussions about Mac SSD's wearing out. I have never seen a single post here about that actually happening.
This is the Internet. People incorrectly read data all the time. Thanks for clarifying though. That’s not a lot.
Indeed. I watched all of this, and was enlightened / encouraged.
Another reason to never use google Chrome, then.A google chrome tab could easy eat away 2GB for certain websites
I have used 2 models of M1 MacBook Air, one with 8GB and one with 16GB RAM. Both were used for development. Now a colleague is using the 8GB while I use the 16.
I can tell you the difference is clear, especially when swap enters into play. The system is designed to use RAM to speed up several operations, so having some readily free memory makes everything go smoother. The machine with more RAM surely seems a big improvement.
This happens because most apps are not perfectly optimised (see PHP storm, docker, illustrator, or simply browser tabs with js apps), and they often use more ram than what you'd expect to be necessary. Swap is fast, but still when it happens you feel some lagginess, which shouldn't happen on a M1, and surely doesn't happen with my current 16GB configuration. Also you lose the RAM cached files, which is helping.
What I learned is: spend the extra, get the 16, it's definitely future-proofing and you actually feel the improvement.
Tim likes to stop short with our wallets.... but cause Apple is starting to short change people / their product and it is up to us to speak up about it like we are, to incite the change
WeVideo on a 2015 Chromebook is verrrrryyyyy slow.Can you send me the url of a chrome tab that will eat away 2GB?
This is what pushed me to 32. Have been using 16GB for last 5 years...had bottlenecking issues specially when I have too many tabs, Figma, PS, AE running at the same time. 16GB again would have been but knowing I cannot upgrade once I buy pushed me towards 32GB RAM.Some have mentioned unified RAM, and I think that's the key. I bought a base Dell XPS 9510 with 8GB of RAM and didn't think twice about it, because the RAM is user upgradeable. However, when I get ready to buy my next MacBook I'll definitely spend more time considering how much RAM I need because, once I've bought it, that's where I'm stuck.
I've survived on MacBook Pro mid 2010 with 8GB for over 10 years and even worked as a game developer with Unity. What I noticed is that the CPU became the problem, not the RAM per se.
Except website works best with google chrome and offer best compatibility for my work site.Another reason to never use google Chrome, then.
i use chrome and safari, and have no issues with safari (which i generally prefer).Except website works best with google chrome and offer best compatibility for my work site.
Safari is awful in terms of website support compared to chrome and Firefox.
I've noticed this too lately.
I think it's just a fad where for some reason people just assume oh slow computer = ram
It's really stupid and I have no idea where this stemmed from.
Clients always ask for more ram to "make it faster"
I assume because it has always been one of the easiest to upgrade parts, it's been something people have latched on to as almost like a scapegoat.
I was wondering this recently too - of where did this idea stem from?
I will say tho, 8gb on an optimized system like mac and 8gb on windows is totally different.
Chrome too is known to be a memory hog, I'm confident that same tab in safari for Mac or even Firefox / opera may consume less ram
I believe what the backlash is about is that starting macbooks since maybe 2015 have had 8gb ram; people just wanna see some generational improvement, and they're not wrong on that front. But that is strictly looking at storage. Since then it has went from DDR3 to DDR4 and the new unified memory runs with the m1 runs at 4266 mt/s which is great. However, being unified memory as well, it means that the gpu needs some too, similar to some intel integrated graphics of the past.
With that being said, while 12gb starting or something like that would be nice, 8gb is fine for most users and so apple will keep it that way. Maybe the m2 mbp should start with 16gb ram, that would be a nice touch.
Reminds me how Apple took quite some time to raise the base iPhone storage, but everyone's glad they did.
I’ve never actually witnessed an SSD wearing out in general, Mac or PC, and I’ve worked on hundreds of computers with them over the years. I know they’re supposed to wear out eventually, but I’ve yet to see it happen in the real world. Regardless, always keep a backup.There have been lots of discussions about Mac SSD's wearing out. I have never seen a single post here about that actually happening.
I've literally never had a problem with this, and I don't burn through my RAM just browsing the internet, and I'm not essentially installing spyware masquerading as a browser.Safari is awful in terms of website support compared to chrome and Firefox.
That cause people think the rated TBW is a hard limit when in reality that's a sort of soft limit. Testing by several sites has found current SSDs reach 3x their rated TBW and still work fine. I believe Anandtech did an article.There have been lots of discussions about Mac SSD's wearing out. I have never seen a single post here about that actually happening.
Bingo.MacBook Pro M1 Max 64 GB Gigachad here that uses every byte. This is basically a bait template thread that pops up every few months whether the given OP in rotation intends for it to be or not.
The guy that works with one file open in an editor, 10 browser tabs, and tracking speed set to slow gives their anecdote praising 8GB and the next guy that works with a render, 300 browser tabs open, an IDE, and all manners of software running (desktop and CLI) gives a sermon about 128GB being a minimal requirement (bonus: references to 'futureproofing'). This is often accompanied by each side judging and critiquing each other's workflow for some reason.
Apple are selling 128GB M1 Ultra chips for a reason and it's certainly not just because people like childishly bragging about high RAM counts and system specs to people online, something that I would absolutely never do.
So we have wildly different personal experiences, and for me, uninstalling Chrome is not an option.I've literally never had a problem with this, and I don't burn through my RAM just browsing the internet, and I'm not essentially installing spyware masquerading as a browser.
Delete Chrome.
Why? Any specific need? Just curious.So we have wildly different personal experiences, and for me, uninstalling Chrome is not an option.