Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This is a RAM (APPLE Unified Memory) thread, and all the usual observations of; How the MACOS/APPLE-Silicon handles memory so much better, The need for more than 8GB for intensive APPS and ‘the future,’ swap degrading and lifespan of the SSD… So, if you had to choose 16gb RAM or 512GB SSD, what’s the best way to go? And, if just a 256gb SSD, how easy is it to use an external SSD, and are the APPLE 256gb internal SSD slower than the 512gb (thinking of MBA M2 with one or the other upgrade, not both)
 
Indeed. I watched all of this, and was enlightened / encouraged.

Can you summarize? Given the slow information transfer rate per minute of videos vs text that gives one an idea as to whether it is worth the time investment in watching it.
 
I have used 2 models of M1 MacBook Air, one with 8GB and one with 16GB RAM. Both were used for development. Now a colleague is using the 8GB while I use the 16.
I can tell you the difference is clear, especially when swap enters into play. The system is designed to use RAM to speed up several operations, so having some readily free memory makes everything go smoother. The machine with more RAM surely seems a big improvement.
This happens because most apps are not perfectly optimised (see PHP storm, docker, illustrator, or simply browser tabs with js apps), and they often use more ram than what you'd expect to be necessary. Swap is fast, but still when it happens you feel some lagginess, which shouldn't happen on a M1, and surely doesn't happen with my current 16GB configuration. Also you lose the RAM cached files, which is helping.
What I learned is: spend the extra, get the 16, it's definitely future-proofing and you actually feel the improvement.
 
In this world, only the most determined, loyal and steel-like Apple fans can say such golden words of love as "memory is actually enough". The fact that there are such unfailing fans is a testament to the greatness of Apple.

"I'm not cold at all, so why do you feel cold? "Witness of the Month motto.Tim's yacht fund is a great honor for fans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mi7chy
I have used 2 models of M1 MacBook Air, one with 8GB and one with 16GB RAM. Both were used for development. Now a colleague is using the 8GB while I use the 16.
I can tell you the difference is clear, especially when swap enters into play. The system is designed to use RAM to speed up several operations, so having some readily free memory makes everything go smoother. The machine with more RAM surely seems a big improvement.
This happens because most apps are not perfectly optimised (see PHP storm, docker, illustrator, or simply browser tabs with js apps), and they often use more ram than what you'd expect to be necessary. Swap is fast, but still when it happens you feel some lagginess, which shouldn't happen on a M1, and surely doesn't happen with my current 16GB configuration. Also you lose the RAM cached files, which is helping.
What I learned is: spend the extra, get the 16, it's definitely future-proofing and you actually feel the improvement.

No! You can't say that! OP has made it very clear and he thinks it's good enough. "He feels" is more important than "your colleague feels".
Your statement is hypocritical to him. He will veto it and then challenge you: please give me a site that eats xG of memory.
 
Some have mentioned unified RAM, and I think that's the key. I bought a base Dell XPS 9510 with 8GB of RAM and didn't think twice about it, because the RAM is user upgradeable. However, when I get ready to buy my next MacBook I'll definitely spend more time considering how much RAM I need because, once I've bought it, that's where I'm stuck.
This is what pushed me to 32. Have been using 16GB for last 5 years...had bottlenecking issues specially when I have too many tabs, Figma, PS, AE running at the same time. 16GB again would have been but knowing I cannot upgrade once I buy pushed me towards 32GB RAM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TechRunner
My iMac from 2015 with a super slow Intel i5 can open all of its apps at once no problem! But, it has 16gb ram. And even when all the apps are open, I can still use one of the apps.
 
I've survived on MacBook Pro mid 2010 with 8GB for over 10 years and even worked as a game developer with Unity. What I noticed is that the CPU became the problem, not the RAM per se.

Same here only I used mine for only 5 years and upgraded to something with a better graphics card for running Mari. Unity, Maya, ZBrush, Xcode, all ran fine on my 8 gigs.
 
Except website works best with google chrome and offer best compatibility for my work site.
Safari is awful in terms of website support compared to chrome and Firefox.
i use chrome and safari, and have no issues with safari (which i generally prefer).

firefox is too ugly to be on my mac 🤣
 
I've noticed this too lately.
I think it's just a fad where for some reason people just assume oh slow computer = ram

It's really stupid and I have no idea where this stemmed from.

Clients always ask for more ram to "make it faster"
I assume because it has always been one of the easiest to upgrade parts, it's been something people have latched on to as almost like a scapegoat.

I was wondering this recently too - of where did this idea stem from?

I will say tho, 8gb on an optimized system like mac and 8gb on windows is totally different.

Chrome too is known to be a memory hog, I'm confident that same tab in safari for Mac or even Firefox / opera may consume less ram

I believe what the backlash is about is that starting macbooks since maybe 2015 have had 8gb ram; people just wanna see some generational improvement, and they're not wrong on that front. But that is strictly looking at storage. Since then it has went from DDR3 to DDR4 and the new unified memory runs with the m1 runs at 4266 mt/s which is great. However, being unified memory as well, it means that the gpu needs some too, similar to some intel integrated graphics of the past.

With that being said, while 12gb starting or something like that would be nice, 8gb is fine for most users and so apple will keep it that way. Maybe the m2 mbp should start with 16gb ram, that would be a nice touch.

Reminds me how Apple took quite some time to raise the base iPhone storage, but everyone's glad they did.

It's not a "fad", nor is it even a theory that isn't grounded in reality.

When your PC does not have enough (fast, very high speed) RAM the operating system begins paging RAM contents out to (slower) SSD media. Before SSDs were commonplace, the paging happened to (brutally slow) hard drives.

Thus inadequate RAM leads to paging and slowness. Try bringing up an app that's been paged out to a slow hard drive. The computer will feel like someone clocked the CPU down to like 1% of its speed.

Admittedly, the issue is less prevalent now with fast SSDs (even though SSDs are a fraction of the speed of RAM) but ask anyone who used a computer that had a spinning HDD and not enough RAM what happened to the PC when the RAM was increased.
 
There have been lots of discussions about Mac SSD's wearing out. I have never seen a single post here about that actually happening.
I’ve never actually witnessed an SSD wearing out in general, Mac or PC, and I’ve worked on hundreds of computers with them over the years. I know they’re supposed to wear out eventually, but I’ve yet to see it happen in the real world. Regardless, always keep a backup.
 
Safari is awful in terms of website support compared to chrome and Firefox.
I've literally never had a problem with this, and I don't burn through my RAM just browsing the internet, and I'm not essentially installing spyware masquerading as a browser.

Delete Chrome.
 
There have been lots of discussions about Mac SSD's wearing out. I have never seen a single post here about that actually happening.
That cause people think the rated TBW is a hard limit when in reality that's a sort of soft limit. Testing by several sites has found current SSDs reach 3x their rated TBW and still work fine. I believe Anandtech did an article.
 
MacBook Pro M1 Max 64 GB Gigachad here that uses every byte. This is basically a bait template thread that pops up every few months whether the given OP in rotation intends for it to be or not.

The guy that works with one file open in an editor, 10 browser tabs, and tracking speed set to slow gives their anecdote praising 8GB and the next guy that works with a render, 300 browser tabs open, an IDE, and all manners of software running (desktop and CLI) gives a sermon about 128GB being a minimal requirement (bonus: references to 'futureproofing'). This is often accompanied by each side judging and critiquing each other's workflow for some reason.

Apple are selling 128GB M1 Ultra chips for a reason and it's certainly not just because people like childishly bragging about high RAM counts and system specs to people online, something that I would absolutely never do.
Bingo.

Can anyone make an argument "I run 512MB RAM machine, all works smoothly. Why do we need 8GB RAM? It's insane" Absolutely.

I recently tested 32GB RAM Mac Studio editing a few streams of 4K at once. And guess what? Once it's out of RAM, it's out of RAM. Then it slows down significantly.

I secretly hope Apple can offer more than 64GB RAM in M2 MAX MacBook...Maybe an odd number similar to 24GB with new macbooks. Unlikely, but who knows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zakarhino
I've literally never had a problem with this, and I don't burn through my RAM just browsing the internet, and I'm not essentially installing spyware masquerading as a browser.

Delete Chrome.
So we have wildly different personal experiences, and for me, uninstalling Chrome is not an option.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.