Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Windows is designed to work on pretty much anything. macOS on the other hand, is designed to work best on supported hardware, preferably the latest one. And at the same time Apple Get away with as little power as they could (aka base model) for macOS support.

So you are arguing that millions of Windows users would have a good experience on a PC with 4Gb of RAM?
 
Hello,
I was wondering about one thing and actually I've been wondering about for awhile: On reddit and on other sites I see people constantly whining about 8GB of RAM and them blaming everybody else for getting the 8GB MBA, because some YouTubers said it's good. I've been using MacBook Air M1 with 8GB of RAM for awhile and I haven't had any issues yet and when I post screenshots of my RAM usage they are like: "Are you upgrading your machine every year?" etc. I mean… I used MacBook Pro mid 2010 for over 10 years and it served me well. It had 8GB of RAM, yet I was able to even make games for it for one company. I finished 3 games and if anything it actually taught me how to optimise the games. My main issue was when I was working on teams and the graphics card became an issue. I had to turn off all the lightning and disable particle effects, but it wasn't an issue of RAM. Also, it took me around 48 hours to export the game and I couldn't use my MacBook during exporting otherwise the whole thing would just crash, but when I checked Activity Monitor during the export it was rather the issue of CPU, not RAM per se.

Same on Windows. My coworkers were constantly about complaining about the ram on their work computers, so the management upgraded the RAM or the computers, yet I'm still using my work computer with 8GB of RAM with no issues at all. I do the same work as they do. I used to have an issue with my MacBook Air M1 where it would randomly shut down and restart itself when I first got it (running Big Sur), but that even happened when nothing was opened and I don't have any issues now. On my MSI laptop I had 8GB of RAM and yet I was able to use Visual studio and surf the web at the same time. I've never had any issues with RAM. The last time I had issues with the RAM was when I had 1GB of RAM, but even then I was able to survive.
View attachment 2020214


Why do I constantly see people whining about the RAM? If you're not happy with it sell your 8GB MBA and buy a 16GB one. Why blame Apple for this? I even see PCs with 4GB of RAM for sale and some of them are around $700.
Well said. I wonder if this applies to Modern web and desktop app developers. Web apps are very heavy these days, maybe because devs get a lot of ram they don’t care to optimize there apps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alien3dx
Hello,
I was wondering about one thing and actually I've been wondering about for awhile: On reddit and on other sites I see people constantly whining about 8GB of RAM and them blaming everybody else for getting the 8GB MBA, because some YouTubers said it's good. I've been using MacBook Air M1 with 8GB of RAM for awhile and I haven't had any issues yet and when I post screenshots of my RAM usage they are like: "Are you upgrading your machine every year?" etc. I mean… I used MacBook Pro mid 2010 for over 10 years and it served me well. It had 8GB of RAM, yet I was able to even make games for it for one company. I finished 3 games and if anything it actually taught me how to optimise the games. My main issue was when I was working on teams and the graphics card became an issue. I had to turn off all the lightning and disable particle effects, but it wasn't an issue of RAM. Also, it took me around 48 hours to export the game and I couldn't use my MacBook during exporting otherwise the whole thing would just crash, but when I checked Activity Monitor during the export it was rather the issue of CPU, not RAM per se.

Same on Windows. My coworkers were constantly about complaining about the ram on their work computers, so the management upgraded the RAM or the computers, yet I'm still using my work computer with 8GB of RAM with no issues at all. I do the same work as they do. I used to have an issue with my MacBook Air M1 where it would randomly shut down and restart itself when I first got it (running Big Sur), but that even happened when nothing was opened and I don't have any issues now. On my MSI laptop I had 8GB of RAM and yet I was able to use Visual studio and surf the web at the same time. I've never had any issues with RAM. The last time I had issues with the RAM was when I had 1GB of RAM, but even then I was able to survive.
View attachment 2020214


Why do I constantly see people whining about the RAM? If you're not happy with it sell your 8GB MBA and buy a 16GB one. Why blame Apple for this? I even see PCs with 4GB of RAM for sale and some of them are around $700.
FIGHT
 
So you are arguing that millions of Windows users would have a good experience on a PC with 4Gb of RAM?
Did I? or do you believe people with 8GB mac has the same experience compared with people who Has 32GB or 64GB ram?
 
How many days of sleep are people getting with the 14” before the battery goes to zero? I’m only getting like four or five. My Intel machines can go a month in sleep mode. Wondering if there’s something wrong with my 14”.

Did I? or do you believe people with 8GB mac has the same experience compared with people who Has 32GB or 64GB ram?

they most likely will have... unless they do HEAVY video editing, CGI movie rendering, heavy multi tasking or some other "fringe case" tasks, but these people know about that... oh and of course AAA gaming, but that's not an issue on Mac (yet?)

most other people (most likely at least 95% from my uneducated guess) who do normal web brwoing, editing a couple of their photos, editing short video clips, writing "normal" books that don't consist of thousands of super high res images, making music that won't use a gargantuan 100+ track count (yes, this can be done... tons of some of the best songs of all time have been done on 20 tracks max, maybe even 4, or just one...) can be fine with 8GB if they aren't wasting resources and close everything every time when it isn't needed anymore
 
Dang, that's hardcore. Definitely the 32GB option was needed on your end. Shame Apple keeps memory prices high and limited to low options.
Sadly, This is my work laptop that was provided to me, my personal macbook pro has 64GB of ram, there was no way i would have purchased anything lesser tbh, especially when my line of work is video editing & motion graphics.

Also, being able to multitask and have multiple applications open at once is a must, EX: closing other applications to save on ram would be more of a headache as the workflow is now disrupted by me closing and opening applications multiple times to get things done.
 
can be fine with 8GB if they aren't wasting resources and close everything every time when it isn't needed anymore
which puts macOS into an iOS-like multitasking philosophy: only use one app or a handful at a time, close out anything else you don't want. I am not saying it is wrong, but this philosophy feeds Apple's greed by allowing them to get away as few as possible rather than guaranteeing proper experience reflected by the product price tag.

Hell, I'd argue even "normal browsing" nowadays could put strains on 8GB of RAM if the user keeps tabs open and use some other programs in the background. But that's a discussion for another day.
 
In my case, it was at about 80% the rated TBW and was fully covered by warranty.

It was an Apple SSD which was replaced by Apple?

Edit: Going to add a final note to everyone saying "they've never seen it". I have never seen a million dollars in person in cash... that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

Never said it didn't. There have been maybe hundreds of posts worrying about SSD failures. I'm just saying that in almost all cases they just don't need to worry about it. If it was a major problem there would be lots of posts. Yours is the first I've seen.
 
So you are arguing that millions of Windows users would have a good experience on a PC with 4Gb of RAM?
yes . mac mini 2014 gb horrible lag if not external ssd . Windows and linux would survive as normal .Only startup slow.
 
I haven't experienced that issue yet.
That is the problem, you are trapped in your own bubble.

Not everyone uses their computer like you do.

And there is one more thing, with these new devices the RAM is NOT UPGRADEABLE. Just because 8GB of RAM might be enough for you today, that doesn't mean it is gonna be enough tomorrow. And if it becomes not enough, you are left in the dust.

Solution? Get a new computer? Sure...

The case for more RAM is even stronger for the devices in which RAM is not upgradeable.
 
This is my work computer, just with an office workload. No heavy-weight multimedia applications. No memory-gobbling virtual machines. As you can see there are 20GB of RAM in use by applications. So no, I would not recommend anybody to buy a machine with 8GB of RAM in 2022.

Memory.png
 
they most likely will have... unless they do HEAVY video editing, CGI movie rendering, heavy multi tasking or some other "fringe case" tasks, but these people know about that... oh and of course AAA gaming, but that's not an issue on Mac (yet?)

most other people (most likely at least 95% from my uneducated guess) who do normal web brwoing, editing a couple of their photos, editing short video clips, writing "normal" books that don't consist of thousands of super high res images, making music that won't use a gargantuan 100+ track count (yes, this can be done... tons of some of the best songs of all time have been done on 20 tracks max, maybe even 4, or just one...) can be fine with 8GB if they aren't wasting resources and close everything every time when it isn't needed anymore
I'm the only developer on my team who is using an 8GB Mac (the rest of them are using 16GB+). We develop very heavy NodeJS applications and have to run multiple instances, fire up XCode, run iOS simulators, have browsers with 40+ tabs open, and so forth. This kicks up the memory pressure well into the yellow and sometimes into the red, and is a heavy enough workload to do so on their 16GB Macs as well. Despite the memory demands, mine generally performs just as well, and builds run in approximately the same amount of time.

8GB does have its limitations if you push it hard enough, but it takes a much heavier workload than people expect to really grind this thing to a halt. The only difference in my workflow (compared to the rest of the team) is that I generally have to be very careful about the iOS simulator (and either have to close out background applications or just forgo it altogether and test on my physical device). Besides this, 8GB has been plenty. I wouldn't exactly call it "future proof" - but Apple's memory management is excellent.
 
This is my work computer, just with an office workload. No heavy-weight multimedia applications. No memory-gobbling virtual machines. As you can see there are 20GB of RAM in use by applications. So no, I would not recommend anybody to buy a machine with 8GB of RAM in 2022.

View attachment 2022150
what important is swap used 0 and compressed is 0. For us either windows or mac , compressed is normal loh.
 
This is my work computer, just with an office workload. No heavy-weight multimedia applications. No memory-gobbling virtual machines. As you can see there are 20GB of RAM in use by applications. So no, I would not recommend anybody to buy a machine with 8GB of RAM in 2022.

View attachment 2022150
Memory pressure is abysmal, do not worry. Mac OS memory management has been designed in such way that it uses bunch of available memory for caching
 
While editing a large Word document yesterday, I had a small amount of swap memory that was being used on my Mac Studio M1 Max with 64GB of memory.

Currently I'm at 17.9 GB with Chrome, Mail, Outlook, Teams, Messages, Discord, Banktivity, Sonos, and Activity Monitor apps open. Paste, OneDrive, SynologyDrive Client, and Time Machine are running in the background.

I have 17.09 GB of cached files being used right now.
 
Memory pressure is abysmal, do not worry. Mac OS memory management has been designed in such way that it uses bunch of available memory for caching
What are you trying to say with "Memory pressure is abysmal"? I agree on the memory management and caching, which is why I didn't mention the 40GB cached files, just the 20GB app memory.
 
Of course it's not new but that doesn't make it any less of an issue. It means they may under / over purchase RAM and they're stuck with that decision (short of selling the system and buying another one).
it's been this way for so long, it should not be a surprise (or issue) for anyone. think ahead, go for what you think you'll need over time. no use complaining about something that's been true for years...
 
it's been this way for so long, it should not be a surprise (or issue) for anyone. think ahead, go for what you think you'll need over time. no use complaining about something that's been true for years...
I did not complain, I answered someones question.
 
Memory pressure is abysmal, do not worry. Mac OS memory management has been designed in such way that it uses bunch of available memory for caching
This is true of most modern operating systems. When it comes to memory management macOS, Windows, Linux, the BSD variants, all effectively function the same.

Even if an application is using 1GB of memory there's a possibility a good portion of it isn't resident in memory (depending on memory pressure). Thus an 8GB system could support memory usage of 16GB without issue because the current working set is likely to be the only part in memory and much smaller than the entirety. With modern SSDs the impact of paging between main memory and secondary memory has greatly diminished. Still, if you're actively working with a 16GB data set more memory is likely to be beneficial.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ArkSingularity
Sadly, This is my work laptop that was provided to me, my personal macbook pro has 64GB of ram, there was no way i would have purchased anything lesser tbh, especially when my line of work is video editing & motion graphics.

Also, being able to multitask and have multiple applications open at once is a must, EX: closing other applications to save on ram would be more of a headache as the workflow is now disrupted by me closing and opening applications multiple times to get things done.
It makes sense and given the demands, I can see this an issue. However, my curiosity is getting the better of me. Why not a Mac Studio?
 
I'm the only developer on my team who is using an 8GB Mac (the rest of them are using 16GB+). We develop very heavy NodeJS applications and have to run multiple instances, fire up XCode, run iOS simulators, have browsers with 40+ tabs open, and so forth. This kicks up the memory pressure well into the yellow and sometimes into the red, and is a heavy enough workload to do so on their 16GB Macs as well. Despite the memory demands, mine generally performs just as well, and builds run in approximately the same amount of time.

8GB does have its limitations if you push it hard enough, but it takes a much heavier workload than people expect to really grind this thing to a halt. The only difference in my workflow (compared to the rest of the team) is that I generally have to be very careful about the iOS simulator (and either have to close out background applications or just forgo it altogether and test on my physical device). Besides this, 8GB has been plenty. I wouldn't exactly call it "future proof" - but Apple's memory management is excellent.
Just look at the that^

Can't we just end the discussion now and say 8GB is plenty for the average user?

As I said in this thread earlier on I did my whole university dissertation on my 8GB machine with an 80 odd page Office doc, Excel with 20 graphs, Rstudio and plenty of Chrome tabs and it felt smooth. I've also edited 1080p footage on FCPX to make a short vid about 4 times. Again, no hiccups, no beachballs.

Right now, 30 Chrome tabs open, 5 of which are youtube. An 7GB video playing, Pages and some other stuff. All smooth.

6 years on and TBW is only 32. Nothing wrong with using swap.

8GB is perfectly fine for the vast vast majority of mac users.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2022-06-23 at 22.09.58.png
    Screenshot 2022-06-23 at 22.09.58.png
    57.1 KB · Views: 142
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.