Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Most people don't realize that a decent to above average watch will run anywhere from 350-700 or more. As OP stated those just tell time and really don't appreciate in value as some will argue. The charging has never been an issue with me (except for beta 1 and 2 of watch OS 2. Lol) but the watch for me charges in like 2 hours from dead.

Michael Kors, Burberry, Nixon and a handful of others will give you the style and quality and run about 350-700 or slightly more.

I guess the people that won't spend the money for the apple watches are the ones that don't value a timepiece. Ones who spend 50-100 on a timex, Casio ect... Not knocking those brands or the people that buy them.

Guess this long winded post is essentially saying a lot of people might not be educated on what a decent timepiece actually runs.

I disagree.

You can get an attractive, reliable watch that will last you for decades with virtually no maintenance costs for $60. It tells you the time when you look at it, with no delay, and the battery will last for five years or more.

Or you can buy an Apple Watch for $350 that might tell you the time after you have deliberately flicked your wrist and waited a second. You have to recharge the battery every day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mojolicious
It's not really a new concept is it? :D
Apparently to many on here a wrist watch is a new concept. And his $400 watch can do far more than my $3000 Rolex can. But I do love my Rolex. But the Apple Watch is what I wear almost all the time now.
 
No but that's a quick demonstration of the convenience of not having to go digging for some device. Telling time is just one aspect. And with some of the huge phones out there including the 6+ that digging can take a while.

Thing is, most people don't need to know the time that conveniently.

Getting the phone out only takes a second.
 
Why is it such a hard sell?

Because it's a flop. A pointless product.

It marks the end of Apple's glory days, I'm sad to say.
Since it's still selling and apparently has outsold the original iPhone at this point as well as having outsold every other smart watch in existence, I'm certain most companies would wish to have such a "flop". Satisfaction numbers higher than any other Apple product, stable sales rate. Subjectively I'm running into more people who are planning to or who just have purchased on. Hopefully you and I both will be this kind of "flop"!
 
  • Like
Reactions: JSB1540
I love my Apple Watch. It was not a tough sale. It does much more than expected. Within the last hour it has benefited me twice. While driving home it notified me that my scripts were ready at Walgreens, allowing me to conveniently pick them up without having to check my phone at a stoplight while driving. It also notified me my last employee and left the office and the security system was armed. 2 less things to worry about and no distraction from driving. Is it for everyone, probably not but why is there so much animosity toward those of us that like it?
 
I disagree.

You can get an attractive, reliable watch that will last you for decades with virtually no maintenance costs for $60. It tells you the time when you look at it, with no delay, and the battery will last for five years or more.

Or you can buy an Apple Watch for $350 that might tell you the time after you have deliberately flicked your wrist and waited a second. You have to recharge the battery every day.
I can also get a dumb "phone" to make calls and only have to charge every 3 to 4 days. Why do we need smartphones when we have laptops that can do everything a smartphone can and then some. For convenience, right. I mean after all, a phone is used to make phone calls. A smartwatch is for convenience. It is also not a replacement for smartphones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sflomenb
Thing is, most people don't need to know the time that conveniently.

Getting the phone out only takes a second.
Not going by the women, and men, that I see digging in their bags or patting their pockets just to find the damn thing.
 
Actually, the feature I use the most on my AW is to tell time. The other features I use less, albeit, I still use them. Just not as much as telling time. My career revolves around time for meetings, conference calls, events, etc.

Seems to me, you would have been better off with a cheap, traditional watch that is attractive and quicker at telling the time than the Apple Watch.
 
I can also get a dumb "phone" to make calls and only have to charge every 3 to 4 days. Why do we need smartphones when we have laptops that can do everything a smartphone can and then some. For convenience, right. I mean after all, a phone is used to make phone calls. A smartwatch is for convenience. It is also not a replacement for smartphones.
We'll always need our phones. But having to always have them in your hand or sitting on a desk can be minimized.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rok73
Seems to me, you would have been better off with a cheap, traditional watch that is attractive and quicker at telling the time than the Apple Watch.
Like I said, I still use the other features like notifications, fitness, tide, weather, stocks, etc. but I look at my AW for the time more than anything. You're going from one extreme to the other. Are you saying I have to use the other features equally to justify me owning the AW?
 
Seems to me, you would have been better off with a cheap, traditional watch that is attractive and quicker at telling the time than the Apple Watch.
In the time it takes you to raise or turn your wrist to see your traditional watch and tell the time the AW will have lit up. There's really no difference. If you don't need or want the device, good, millions of us do and are glad we got them.
 
Since it's still selling and apparently has outsold the original iPhone at this point as well as having outsold every other smart watch in existence, I'm certain most companies would wish to have such a "flop". Satisfaction numbers higher than any other Apple product, stable sales rate. Subjectively I'm running into more people who are planning to or who just have purchased on. Hopefully you and I both will be this kind of "flop"!

It has the worst customer satisfaction ratings for any front page Apple hardware product since 1997. Only 66% are very satisfied.

Sales are so bad that Tim Cook will not admit what they are.

So yes, it's a flop.
 
It has the worst customer satisfaction ratings for any front page Apple hardware product since 1997. Only 66% are very satisfied.

Sales are so bad that Tim Cook will not admit what they are.

So yes, it's a flop.
The numbers I read were 97% satisfaction. And again it has outsold the original iPhone. And, again subjectively, I haven't met anyone who actually has one, not that lurks here, but actually has one that isn't extremely happy with it.

http://appleinsider.com/articles/15...ne-ipad-through-9-weeks-cfo-luca-maestri-says

http://appleinsider.com/articles/15...action-outpaces-original-iphone-ipad---report
 
  • Like
Reactions: JSB1540
We'll always need our phones. But having to always have them in your hand or sitting on a desk can be minimized.
We don't need phones on us. I can always find a phone somewhere or keep a pager on me if someone needs to get a hold of me immediately. A cellphone just makes life more convenient. Do you ever wonder how life was before cellphones? It actually went on.
 
It has the worst customer satisfaction ratings for any front page Apple hardware product since 1997. Only 66% are very satisfied.

Sales are so bad that Tim Cook will not admit what they are.

So yes, it's a flop.
Where did you get your info from?
 
We don't need phones on us. I can always find a phone somewhere or keep a pager on me if someone needs to get a hold of me immediately. A cellphone just makes life more convenient.
Haven't seen a payphone in a long time and didn't know they still made pagers. Yes it is a convenience, yet for me necessary.
 
I think there are some people who do misunderstand it - but I also think that some understand perfectly well that it is a complimentary device and struggle with spending that kind of money on an accessory. That's not an insignificant price considering you have to keep your iPhone with you to really use it.

Good point. The price is absolutely a barrier for many. It would be even if the watch could fully function without the iPhone nearby. For many of us the device is well worth the $350/$400 for the Sport, and maybe even double that for the SS. I had my doubts about whether or not it would be worth the price to me, but after using it I can say that it is absolutely worth it to me (and I do not have much disposable income these days). It's probably not worth it to most iPhone users, unless they just have the money to burn.

Also, I personally believe the Apple Watch Edition is hurting sales a little. While it may be a standard marketing ploy to offer an outrageously priced option to make your less expensive options seem like good values, I think the Edition is behind some of the backlash and downright hostility towards the Apple Watch. Some people find the gold Edition so repugnant that it turns them off the entire Apple Watch series as being overpriced and under-performing devices meant for suckers and elitist snobs. Part of me thinks that critical reception of the AW would have been more positive if they had waited a year before releasing the gold Edition. But of course what would really help is if they had offered the Sport watches for about $100 less than they currently sell for. On the other hand the original iPod cost $400 14 years ago, and look at how successful that became even as competitors like Creative offered devices that held more songs for half the price. Of course the iPod's design and interface was far more elegant (and I say that as someone who bought the Creative mp3 players intead of the iPods). I guess Apple won me over with the iPhone, iPad and now the Apple Watch :)

Sean
 
We don't need phones on us. I can always find a phone somewhere or keep a pager on me if someone needs to get a hold of me immediately. A cellphone just makes life more convenient. Do you ever wonder how life was before cellphones? It actually went on.
I just meant that the watch is not going to replace the phone. I also find it interesting that no one actually "needs" a smartphone but almost all have one these days. That really picked up after the iPhone came out. I'm guessing a wearable like these watches or some other device ( Google Glass? ) will become more common in the future.
 
Haven't seen a payphone in a long time and didn't know they still made pagers. Yes it is a convenience, yet for me necessary.
I have to agree. I haven't seen a payphone in years. And there are millions of people who have to be available and reachable at all hours. And a pager only goes so far. Plus when I've had to use one I hate hearing that sound. In my hospital there are no more pagers, they've gone to wifi phones. And the administrative/managerial staff are being given iPhones.
 
The only customer satisfaction survey that has been published.
Of the more than 800 Apple Watch owners surveyed by Wristly, 31 percent said they were "somewhat satisfied" while 66 percent were "very satisfied/delighted." In comparison, just 91 percent of iPad buyers and 92 percent of those who picked up first-generation iPhones were satisfied with their purchase.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.