Jumpthesnark
macrumors 68000
You didn't read the thread, right? $2k is base price for an amount of RAM no one will want. Add the RAM you need, and you're at $3K+.
Someone needs to learn the difference between RAM and storage.
You didn't read the thread, right? $2k is base price for an amount of RAM no one will want. Add the RAM you need, and you're at $3K+.
It would be 2-3% if they made a 27” and Pro versions. 😉iMac represents 1% of global PC shipments. Is the iMac a failure?
1% of global shipments is terrible but also very broad. 78% of global shipments of laptops and desktops were laptops.iMac represents 1% of global PC shipments. Is the iMac a failure?
Wow, you're really gripping tight onto that 2% stat despite the flawed and conflated representation. The global market includes entry/budget models, mid-range, premium, and ultra-premium segments, of which inherently pricier foldables occupy only the last segment. Grouping foldables amongst all types of smartphones is a gross misrepresentation. But let's ignore the fundamental fallacy for a moment.I’m not talking about anyone but Apple. Mac marketshare which I already knew the answer to… that isn’t niche. Folding phones at 2% marketshare is niche. I predict the Duo will hardly dent that.
When it’s your money. When it’s your company. When you have to make the decison, then it gets real. The 2% stat matters. It demonstrates that after 7 years, foldables are niche.Wow, you're really gripping tight onto that 2% stat despite the flawed and conflated representation. The global market includes entry/budget models, mid-range, premium, and ultra-premium segments, of which inherently pricier foldables occupy only the last segment. Grouping foldables amongst all types of smartphones is a gross misrepresentation. But let's ignore the fundamental fallacy for a moment.
Trying to minimize foldable sales by pointing to a 2% global figure is actually impressive. Why? Because it still represents at least 25 million foldable phones annually. Like @surferfb pointed out, I would still love a Porsche in the garage despite its dismal global automobile market share. The Tesla Model Y represents, at most, 1.5% of global vehicle sales yet took the global sales crown in 2023 and 2025 (and was a very close second in 2024 behind the RAV4).
This is all to say you can keep throwing out the 2% stat. There's more to the story behind it and isn't the weakness nor niche you want it to be. With Apple onboard, it's going to be even harder to pigeonhole the category as niche.
Tbh Termu’s interview talking about the Duo low key sold me, that sit down with Joz was the alternate perspective you mentioned, Apple is a status symbol, regardless of the device, a majority will always talk down android users, be green texts, to google pixel users, The Duo will be the ultimate snob fest that we won’t hear the end of it. The Vision Pro “was” niched, but you underestimate the mobility aspect of having the “new” device.When it’s your money. When it’s your company. When you have to make the decison, then it gets real. The 2% stat matters. It demonstrates that after 7 years, foldables are niche.
It is a valid comparison. Not all folding phones are $2000.
Stop. I never said I have seen it in person.
It is? As compared to what?And a screen that is deep matte hazy as hell.
🤣You’ve never seen the screen in person I suspect. Watch some YouTube videos. That matte screen looked terrible to me.
Please describe how "aggressive" the nano-texture is, from first hand experience. Is it the same as a nano-texture screen iPad? The same as a nano-texture Studio Display? Both? Neither? You can't tell us because you don't know.the inner screen is an aggressive matte
Which, again, you haven't seen in person.What is particularly jarring is the transition from the outside glossy screen to the inner matte screen.
So let's just make up what can be seen then!there are so many layers on the inner screen it’s incredible anything can be seen on the screen.
If you've touched one in person, then you can tell us it feels like sandpaper. Wait, you haven't so you can't.That sandpaper screen would also drive me insane
Oh that's interesting. Those who disagree with you are suffering from hubris. Go on...It’s the amount of hubris that people engage in on this stuff that never stops and never ceases to amaze me.
Pot, kettle.I think it’s also hubris to act like some all-knowing god and belittling those who disagree.
Anybody can project whatever they want.
Just imagine, a Mac that could fold, almost in the shape of a book. You could then put your folding iMac in a bag, take it where you want, and even use it on the TOP of your LAP.And if the iMac Fold came out I would predict the same fate: it would get just a tiny fraction of not only the overall market, but of regular iMac sales
Well, I'm a shareholder and fully behind Apple's leadership and their decision to enter the "2%" market (which we both know is truly at least 10-15%, but that will be our secret).When it’s your money. When it’s your company. When you have to make the decison, then it gets real. The 2% stat matters. It demonstrates that after 7 years, foldables are niche.
It is a valid comparison. Not all folding phones are $2000.
What's wrong with Apple making niche devices? Half their lineup, if not more, could be considered niche! Personally, I think Apple should make more niche products!When it’s your money. When it’s your company. When you have to make the decison, then it gets real. The 2% stat matters. It demonstrates that after 7 years, foldables are niche.
It is a valid comparison. Not all folding phones are $2000.
It's quite comical how you defend the 1% iMac market share as "very broad". By the very same token, the "2% foldable global market share" you like to toss around is also "very broad" and skewed by irrelevant product segments.1% of global shipments is terrible but also very broad. 78% of global shipments of laptops and desktops were laptops.
Apple has spent its whole existence fighting for Mac marketshare and they have struggled to get more.
Mac marketshare of the PC market is over 10%.
Where Apple makes a lot of its money is in services and iPhone. iPhone and Services generated 76.6% of Apple’s revenue in fiscal 2025. Mac just 8.1%. If Apple was just dealing in Mac, it would still be a good company but nothing even close to what it is today.
We’re talking here specifically about a new category of device. And if the iMac Fold came out I would predict the same fate: it would get just a tiny fraction of not only the overall market, but of regular iMac sales.
As a former 13 mini user and lover, I’m triggered 😅Success is indicated by a third version of the same device. If it is disconnected after the Duo 2, then we can all agree it’s a failure.
I dislike iPad OS too. I bought iPad Pros and sold them on two different occasions. Awkward as heck and interior to my MacBook Air and iPhone 17 Pro Max. I will buy the iPad Mini being released soon. Much easier to use as it’s smaller, etc.
The iPad with magic keyboard is a lawn-mower with wings: same problem, as it’s just worse at many things compared to smartphones and laptops and desktops. As a straight tablet it’s good, but I need that smaller Mini form factor.
Erm it’s akshully a bigger iPhone 18e, thank you very much 😒Instead you're buying an iPhone 17e that becomes a bigger iPhone with an extra camera.
So when you open the inner screen, the active app has to quit, re-load, and pass its current state to the new instance?I'm not convinced it will fail. Quite the opposite: Apple will sell millions based on the slick animations alone!
But I'm still convinced buyers are getting massively undersold. Apple are coming in on the 8th floor of the foldable market, not the ground. Other companies have made mistakes they can easily iterate on and they have this rich tablet ecosystem they're not even remotely tapping into.
For £2000 I expect it to run iPadOS but show iOS binaries on the front display. This isn't a technical challenge but software flags for universal apps. This would in turn give it the extra utility of a windowed desktop environment on an external display and meet feature parity with rivals.
Instead you're buying an iPhone 17e that becomes a bigger iPhone with an extra camera.
Thats based on current thinking of running a single instance at a time. The Duo has the power of Zeus at its disposal and could easily run them simultaneously.So when you open the inner screen, the active app has to quit, re-load, and pass its current state to the new instance?