It's NOT machined Aluminum, it's stamped Aluminum with some machining, which is nowhere near the same quality. The build quality is incredibly terrible on the XPS 15 in comparison. Apple makes their machines out of solid blocks of aluminum that have laser cut sections. There is no comparison between these two construction techniques. This is the highest quality and strongest manufacturing process available. Dell uses a cheap imitation of this process, that is 4-5 times weaker structurally. The carbon fiber is also a mass produced flat sheet that you can buy for a few cents, with no custom forming whatsoever. It's just bought in massive sheets for a few dollars and cut to size. It's insultingly cheap and also incredibly tacky and literally screwed onto the top cover, it would look better without it.
I've had computers made with the machined aluminum like Dell use. Being dropped from a few feet the entire cased cracked. Dropping my macbook in the exact same situation just resulted in a small dent. Cheap manufacturers use cheap brittle aluminum that cracks with the smallest amount of force. It's really misleading because it's not the durable material you think you're getting. Dell and HP use the same aluminum alloy that hotwheels uses for their toys, which is 6061, and it's not made from solid blocks but sintered, which means it's made from a powder that is melted together and full of structural weaknesses inside every inch. This is around 4-5 times weaker than the 2024-T3 alloy which comes from a solid block.
Sintered 6061 is held together a lot like a sugar cookie and it's very brittle in the same way. It has a tensile strength of around 40 MPa if they use a high quality process. 2024 has a tensile strength of 220 MPa.
RMBP doesn't need a battery saving IGZO display because the software saves 3 times more power than windows. Also the display is uncalibrated which meant it will be unusable by creative professionals and look incredibly terrible.
Image
Here's an example of a conservative comparison of the problem.
This is a complete utter and total lie in every sense of the word.
The XPS has a
4 hours 58 minute battery life doing light web browsing, with the i7 processor. You can expect well under 4 if you're doing anything more with the i7. The 11 hours is measured with the i3 doing extremely simple tasks at very low brightness which is
designed to mislead consumers. If fuel economy tests were done by Dell then the Prius would get 5 million miles per gallon.
Apple gives real world battery usage figures, not made up lies, and most tests actually exceed Apple's quoted battery life. However when Dell's battery life quotes are tested the real life figures are usually half of what Dell's are.
The Verge clocked The MacBook Pro Retina 15" with the i7 at
9 hours and 35 minutes in it's real world battery test. That's 37% better than quoted. That same test showed that all Dell laptops get HALF the battery life dell quoted. For example the Dell XPS 14 is quoted at 10 hours of battery life, but The Verge was only able to get 6 in their standard test, and that's with a super high efficiency low voltage "u" processor in the XPS 14. With a high powered i7 processor like in the MacBook Pro 15" you're looking at 5 hours on the Dell versus 9.5 hours on the Mac. Dell misleads, plain and simple.
Replacing a MacBook is not expensive, they hold their value well, unlike PC's.
Apple sells RAM upgrades at a price that is so low this is a non issue. It's actually cheaper to get an Apple ram upgrade than it would ever be to get a Dell with more ram. It's $200 for 16GB, I spent more than that getting 16GB of high quality ram on sale to upgrade my Mac Mini.
Screen brightness is irrelevant if the screen is unusable by a professional due to lack of calibration. And don't suggest calibrating the screen with a $100 tool, The cheap tools don't work properly, I've purchased 6 calibration tools under $500 and none worked even remotely well, you need a $5,000 tool which I own just for that purpose. The brightness difference might matter but both are acceptable.
Actually Dell lies about this too. That .70 is measuring without the feet. The MacBook Pro Retina 15" is .69 without the feet, the Dell is .75 with the feet. The MacBook also has a thicker shell which is more durable, and again the upgrades don't matter because unlike it's upgradable computers like the cMBP or iMac Apple heavily subsidized all non-upgradable parts to the point where they sell them near cost. For example 16GB of ram is $200, you'd pay around that price if you wanted to upgrade it yourself. I paid $220 to upgrade my Mac Mini to 16gb with high quality laptop ram.
People need to get out of the mindset that they should upgrade their computer. Simply sell it and buy a replacement, it's much more economical, especially with an Apple computer and buy the storage you need in the first place.
You can get a 1TB SSD with the new MacBook Pro 15", that's more storage than any configuration the dell would have. Again get out of the ridiculous mindset that you need to upgrade your computer over time, either get what you need from the beginning or sell your computer and buy a new one when you need more.
Apple computers are not more expensive than other computers. They are the
Apple makes the least expensive computers in the world in each class.
Example. I purchased the most one of the fastest Dell XPS laptops that money could buy 2.5 years ago and sold it after 13 months. I bought it for $2300. I sold it for $700
That's a loss of $1600.
A year ago I purchased a mid level MacBook Pro 15" with a $200 corporate discount. I paid $2600 WITH tax. I sold it for $2373 11 months later.
That's a loss of $227. The Dell cost me nearly 10 times more than MacBook cost me.
2 years ago I purchased a new MacBook Air for $1670 with the corporate discount, I sold it 5 months later for $1590, that's $80 for 5 months usage.
I also purchased a used MacBook Air 3 years ago for $810. 2 years go I sold it for $850, that's a profit of $40.
All non-Apple computers depreciate extremely severely, Apple computers do not depreciate very much at all. This is also why it's better to simply sell an Apple computer and get one with different specs instead of upgrading. With a non-Apple computer you have to upgrade, with an Apple computer you can sell yours and buy a different one for way less than it costs to upgrade an old computer.
AGAIN, Dell did not optimize a dedicated card better than Apple did with graphics switching, this is absolutely silly. What Dell did is they mislead consumers with bogus battery life claims based on ridiculously impossible testing criteria. Apple's MacBooks Pro Retina 15" has
TWICE the battery life of the XPS 15" Pro.
There's a huge noticeable difference in speed.
This is a completely incorrect conclusion in every way.
The XPS 15" is not a better value. It costs 10 times more than the Apple in the long run. It's build quality isn't on the same planet and it has that cheaply tacked on carbon fiber and the lowest quality extremely brittle aluminum, and it is worse in literally every category. Worse battery life, professionally unusable screen with poor colors, tacky design, much much louder annoying fans, and a terrible warranty that will leave you stranded without a computer for a long time while dell fixes things (Apple has guaranteed turn around, and can fix things in a local store, which is a huge advantage if you can't be without a computer).
Simply put you are extremely naive and were misled by slick marketing to think that a poorly made piece of junk is better than the highest quality laptop on the market. It's not. You basically did the equivalent of seeing that Ford add where they try to make the Focus look better than a BMW M3, and then concluded: Man I should really get a Ford Focus, it's so much better!