I guess you'd be also fine with Maemo - or S60-5th Ed.Why would I want to buy an iPhone 4 versus an Andriod 2.2 phone?
Why would I want to buy an iPhone 4 versus an Andriod 2.2 phone?
Why would I want to buy an iPhone 4 versus an Andriod 2.2 phone?
It's a personal choice. I bought one because it works great with iTunes, and iPhoto and everything else I have - right out of the box. I don't have an issue with the iTunes App store, and like the fact that there is SOME curation over the content. It may not be perfect, but it's better than a free for all where I can download anything form anywhere.
I don't care about the open source angle, and I don't mind paying for an app if I am going to use it. I like the attention to detail of the Apple products, and how they all work together.
For me it's the Mac vs. Windows issue all over again.
But in the end, it's a personal choice, buy whatever works for YOU...
There are more apps in the App Store than you will ever use. It's nice to have just one place where you can go to browse for apps.You would want an iPhone because you like LESS choices and like the idea of giving up control over what you do and the content you use on your phone.
There isn't any content that "requires" Flash in order to access it.Plus, you don't want to be able to access any Flash content.
Nearly all the popular smartphones start at $199.Oh, and you want to pay more to be part of an elite consumer base who thrive on Apple products at any price.
iPhone is not available on Verizon yet.And you also love the idea of having one choice for wireless companies who are famous for over-charging and under-delivering.
iPhone is nice whether you wrap it in a bumper or not. Nobody I know who has an iPhone 4 has dropped any calls yet.But the phones are nice as long as you wrap them in a bumper to keep the signal from accidentally dropping.
All of these things are nonissues. Go for it!!If this all sounds good, then go for it!![]()
There are more apps in the App Store than you will ever use. It's nice to have just one place where you can go to browse for apps.
There isn't any content that "requires" Flash in order to access it.
Nearly all the popular smartphones start at $199.
iPhone is not available on Verizon yet.
iPhone is nice whether you wrap it in a bumper or not. Nobody I know who has an iPhone 4 has dropped any calls yet.
All of these things are nonissues. Go for it!!![]()
1. I'm pretty sure he was being sarcastic
2. Are you kidding me? There are still a fair amount of sites that are not useable unless you have Flash.
But yeah, I haven't had any problems with my iPhone 4. Any other smartphone I've tried (HTC, Samsung, Blackberry) they all feel very clunky to me both in operation and in the hand.
Not to mention the Samsung Galaxy S is just a pure iPhone rip off with a hump on the bottom of it. I kinda wish the iPhone had that SWYPE feature though, that's pretty awesome!
Why would I want to buy an iPhone 4 versus an Andriod 2.2 phone?
While buying my iPhone 4 a couple of weeks ago, my local AT&T store had the Galaxy S. I very briefly tried it out and they showed me the swipe feature.
Maybe this is old news to everyone here, but I found something, possibly on this site and the iPhone offers a swipe feature that was new to me. I believe when in Mail you can swipe on a email message and it gives you the option to delete that mail message. This only eliminates the edit process, but thought it was pretty cool. Everyone may already know this, but in case someone didn't.
Cause you love that ATT service.
How will they keep them in stock at Verizon?
Maybe they won't get the chance. Why give the iPhone to Verizon at all? AT&T works great for most users and has higher approval ratings overall. I've been with them since they were SWB in the 80's and they have always provided excellent service wherever I have been. It makes no sense to switch to Verizon or even allow them in the door. They were always the company that offered a limited selection of crappy proprietary phones while AT&T has always had the cutting edge hardware. It's not surprising that applies to the iPhone as well.
Or unusable even with Flash - http://blog.laptopmag.com/mobile-flash-fail-weak-android-player-proves-jobs-right2. Are you kidding me? There are still a fair amount of sites that are not useable unless you have Flash.
i was actually talking about this one
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQFQfOVhdbE
now that i watch an actual video of it... it looks like it would be slow to type with since the sensitivity and response of it doesn't seem so good
It is entirely possible he was being sarcastic, but it's hard to tell on message forums sometimes.1. I'm pretty sure he was being sarcastic
It's true there are probably many sites that require Flash. But I took his post to mean that there was content that required Flash. I took it to mean that content refers to information, whether it be in printed, video, or audio form. A site is just a vehicle for the delivery of the content. So, while there are sites that require Flash to browse them, I'm sure there are sites where you can get the same content without having to encounter Flash. Looking through that one App Store, you can even find native apps that will provide you with access to content and native apps are better than both Flash AND HTML.2. Are you kidding me? There are still a fair amount of sites that are not useable unless you have Flash.
But yeah, I haven't had any problems with my iPhone 4. Any other smartphone I've tried (HTC, Samsung, Blackberry) they all feel very clunky to me both in operation and in the hand.
But in the end, it's a personal choice, buy whatever works for YOU...