Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
is that a joke? that would fail miserably.. why start over? do you expect to have the same boom as from the app store? do u know how confusing that would be to have 2 app stores?

By start over I didn't mean re-do the whole App Store. It'll be one App Store, but it'll have a tab for the Nano only. Developers develop apps everyday, so why not spend some time making an app for the Nano only. Most developers love making apps anyway.
 
By start over I didn't mean re-do the whole App Store. It'll be one App Store, but it'll have a tab for the Nano only. Developers develop apps everyday, so why not spend some time making an app for the Nano only. Most developers love making apps anyway.

Then if the nano becomes more popular then the cheaper phone has more apps and more functionality? :/
 
I would assume that they will be using the same resolution in both screens so that apps could run on both versions without change.

but elements in an iPhone app that are designed with target zones for pressing that are just right for the 3.5" screen would be hard to press on an iPhone Nano screen

the target zones would have to be completely recoded for some of the apps
 
Then if the nano becomes more popular then the cheaper phone has more apps and more functionality? :/

haha! well you would have to have a nano to use the nano apps. i dont think believe the nano will outsell the 3G model. it may take a while for that to happen.
 
Actual Size!

For the very basics phone/email/web and the I and the :apple: Besides it probley has edge so maybe 15-20 bucks for data via att!

-------------------------------
:apple::apple::apple::apple:
:apple: :apple:
:apple: :apple:
:apple: :apple:
:apple: :apple:
:apple:------:D-------:apple:
:apple::apple::apple::apple:
--------------------------------
Actual Size and yes im bored!
 
Only logical approach to release an iPhone nano is to handicap the device with limited functionality, but enough jazz to still be an touchscreen iPhone. This way Apple can market toward a bigger market, while not shooting themselves in the legs for losing sale on the pricier 3G model.
 
I also think the iphone nano is a waste of time, first they should focus on better battery, stability, and features of the current iphone for future models.

Thank you!

Focus on either updating or upgrading the current and next iphone, not this silly nano bs.
 
While I agree with many of u on the 'pointlessness'/waste of time of an iPhone Nano....

...I also see a gap for a disposable mobile pay as you go 'dumbed' down iphone.

I know many people who simply want a mobile/ipod without the data and email etc... just a plain old easy to use phone with ipod capabilities...

If Apple do make an iPhone Nano i hope they dont shoot themselves in the foot and tie it to an operator and just supply it as a disposable mobile phone.
 
I agree, I don't like the iPhone nano. I just don't see the point in it. It may pull off as a fun little toy, but other than that, I would take no seriousness in purchasing one.
 
Many reasons:

Smaller,
lighter,
cheaper,
no data plan (presumably no browser, etc),
people who don't want so much "smart" and just want "phone."
 
Many reasons:

Smaller,
lighter,
cheaper,
no data plan (presumably no browser, etc),
people who don't want so much "smart" and just want "phone."

Seems fair, I could see why people would definitely dive for it if there wasn't a required data service. But wouldn't this lower the sales on the iphones?
 
Because this is Apple we are talking about.

They aren't just another mobile phone company. The iPhone is has outstanding technologies in it and I doubt Steve would ever let any of those slide away and release a diddy version.

I was following you guys until we hit this spot?

What "outstanding technology" does it have? 3G? Crippled BT stack? Lack of Disk Mode?

It's a dumbed down smart phone.

---------------------------------------

Oh, I know – it has a touch screen!! Wow! No other phone has such a thing!

Seriously, what _technology_ is "outstanding" in the iPhone?

P.S. I'm with you guys when it comes to why it will sell. People think my Samsung i780 is big (it's almost the exact size of the iphone (it can use the same slipcases), but people really do think it's big. Personally, I think the iPhone feels quite a lot bigger than most phones including mine.
 
I've spent way too much time talking about something that doesn't and won't exist, but for the record I'm with the OP and the smart people in this thread - it's NEVER going to happen.
 
Personally, I think this is a great idea.

Maybe someone just wants a cell phone with an iPod in it and not all the other bells and whistles.

Who knows.

And I don't see this taking away any 3G sales as I think the type of person wanting each would be different.
 
Personally, I think this is a great idea.

Maybe someone just wants a cell phone with an iPod in it and not all the other bells and whistles.

Who knows.

And I don't see this taking away any 3G sales as I think the type of person wanting each would be different.

motorola-rokr-e8-motorokr-e8.jpg


^ look, it's your lucky day!
 
I want an iPhone MAXI!

Who wants a smaller version of the iPhone for $99?
I'll take a big 6" or bigger iPhone Tablet. :D
 
Tosser, why don't u go toss something... Maybe your i780 :rolleyes:

I was serious. When you guys make statements like the iPhone having "outstanding technology in it", you ought to be able to back it up. But I guess on these boards, nonsense is always back up by more nonsense like your suggestion to "toss" my i780. You know, a real smartphone the iPhone can only dream to aspire to. I can think of only one thing the iPhone does better: Play video. Unfortunately, the OS makes poor use of all that space with huge buttons.

You still don't feel like answering the following question?

Which "outstanding technology" does the iPhone have?

P.S. I bought my phone because it is more useful as a tool - not because I wanted the "prettiest" toy around to watch movies on.
 
outstanding phone

You still don't feel like answering the following question?

Which "outstanding technology" does the iPhone have?

Someone else said the iPhone has outstanding technology.
To me it is an outstanding phone. I agree other SmartPhones do more but they are ugly, slow, with a useless User Interface and too many buttons to push or things to slide... Not to mention they are all thick as a brick.

The iphone has one of the simplest, most elegant and fluid interfaces out there. The iPhone has gestures and multi-touch, which the others are still trying to emulate.

2 years ago there were lots of touch screen Smart Phones from Sony and Nokia, and they were $800 to $1000 so nobody was buying them.

Since the iPhone, not only all the competitors are trying to copy it, but they are failing too. Nokia has a new N-Series Smart Phone. Nice, but $699 and it's still thick as hell. Sony is out of the picture with their P-Series and even the sorry BlackBerry is trying to be an iPhone now.

Outstanding is what Apple did in just 16 months. Revolutionize the phone AND smart phone markets, thus creating a new kind of platform. Everytime I see someone with an iPod Touch, a crappy flip phone and a digital camera I feel sorry for them. They can easily get a $199 iPhone and forget about the other stuff...

Your i780 is twice as expensive as the iPhone and it has a smaller screen, a keyboard that unless you are 2 years old, your fingers are too big to use and also the ugliness factor. It looks just like any other smart phone out there, generic and boring and none of the companies out there are making any accessories for it cause it's a phone that will be discontinued in 3 months... Just because it is not OUTSTANDING enough.

Cheers, baby
:apple:
 
Can it sync flawlessly to ITunes like the iPhone can?

Is it made by Apple?

Didn't think so.

So I fail to see the relevance.

Yes it syncs to iTunes. Please tell me that you're not that much of a brand whore that you won't buy it simply because it doesn't have an Apple logo on it lol. It's exactly what you want in a handset... The point I'm making is that Apple doesn't need to make it's own cheap phone (or doesn't want to) and has rather decided to license access to the iTunes store to other handsets like this Motorola phone.
 
I think the point is to release it on verizon under the name "iPhone Nano"
 
Someone else said the iPhone has outstanding technology.
To me it is an outstanding phone. I agree other SmartPhones do more but they are ugly, slow, with a useless User Interface and too many buttons to push or things to slide... Not to mention they are all thick as a brick.
As mentioned, the i780 fit the same slip-cases sold for the iPhone. That's hardly "thick as a brick".

The user interface on my i780 is certainly more complex than the one on the iPhone, but that extra complexity comes with a fully featured phone.


The iphone has one of the simplest, most elegant and fluid interfaces out there.
That's my point: It SO simplified that they had to remove features because the interface is so simple it's almost impossible to implement even the simplest of things while keeping the simplicity. Cut and paste, for one.

The iPhone has gestures and multi-touch, which the others are still trying to emulate.
Yes, but viewing phones as TOOLS, not TOYS, those things are less than productive. Plus having to navigate with your fingers only limits the usage of that screen size.


2 years ago there were lots of touch screen Smart Phones from Sony and Nokia, and they were $800 to $1000 so nobody was buying them.

Are you trying to back up your "suggestion" that I should toss my i780? Seriously? And go with a portable video viewer that wouldn't be half as cabaple as a tool?


Since the iPhone, not only all the competitors are trying to copy it, but they are failing too. Nokia has a new N-Series Smart Phone. Nice, but $699 and it's still thick as hell. Sony is out of the picture with their P-Series and even the sorry BlackBerry is trying to be an iPhone now.
The thickness-debate is ridiculous. I am talking about "outstanding technologies" and "tool vs. toy", you keep trying to make this a debate about looks and thickness. Apparently it's all about looking "cool", with no thought given to how things actually work.

Secondly, you're appealing to popularity. You know, the McDonald's argument: Many people eat at McDonald's, thus is must be better than a five star restaurant.


Outstanding is what Apple did in just 16 months. Revolutionize the phone AND smart phone markets, thus creating a new kind of platform.
Actually, the only "outstanding" in that is the marketing and how many sheep bit.
I was asking people to back up their "outstanding technologies"-claim, not whether they succeded getting popular. By your argument, Windows is the end-all of all OS'es, just like IE is the best browser ever, and was even more perfect five-ten years ago.


Everytime I see someone with an iPod Touch, a crappy flip phone and a digital camera I feel sorry for them. They can easily get a $199 iPhone and forget about the other stuff...
LOL, you "feel sorry" for someone who uses a stand-alone camera? Are you serious? You feel sorry for people who like to have a stand-alone music player where playing music doesn't subtract from talk-time and vice versa? Are you effing kidding me?



Your i780 is twice as expensive as the iPhone and it has a smaller screen, a keyboard that unless you are 2 years old, your fingers are too big to use and also the ugliness factor.
Yet another thing where you speak of something you don't know anything about:
You obviously haven't checked prices. I bought it very cheaply – it's more expensive in Denmark than the US, but I bought it for the equivalent of US$300. That's without the sim locked and without a plan. That's hardly "twice" the price. In fact, in the end it's MUCH cheaper than what people pay for your toy.

Secondly, the keyboard does seem a little small at first – especially from the looks. I was very worried to begin with that it would be too smal, but the reality is that within a day I had no problems hitting the right keys first time – you can feel them. For the record, I'm 6'1" tall and have rather big hands.


It looks just like any other smart phone out there, generic and boring
Wha? You mean the iPhone is "unique"? Seriously, you like to quote sales figures. Think about it. I have to say though, your endless focus on looks, looks, thinness, looks, looks, thinness, and looks really says a lot.


and none of the companies out there are making any accessories for it cause it's a phone that will be discontinued in 3 months... Just because it is not OUTSTANDING enough.
Hmm, what "accessories" do I need for my phone (which, btw, have been out for almost a year and it's still selling – you REALLY should do your research, before you mouth off) I use as a TOOL?
I have some memory cards (very important), a screen protector, a headphone/line-out adaptor and a sleeve. Are you saying that because I can't buy accessories such as docks and whatnot it's somehow inferior? You really should consider the points I have made about "tool vs. toy".



Cheers, baby

Cheerio


Yes, we know – even if takes defending blindly. We wouldn't want that vacuum to be broken, now would we?
 
That's not a good comparison at all. The comparison would be the iPod Nano to the iPod Classic.

Umm... what?

An iPhone sans the phone capabilities is, for all intents and purposes, an iPod Touch.

An iPod Nano, with added phone capabilities, would be an iPhone Nano.

The iPod Classic doesn't enter into it at all. :confused:

And I reiterate, to all those posters claiming there's no space in the lineup for an iPhone Nano because the regular iPhone exists, the exact same logic you use to come to that conclusion leads to the conclusion that there's no space for an iPod Nano.

And yet, iPod Nanos continue to sell very, very well.

The same is true of smartphones versus dumbphones: in spite of fantastic smartphones on the market, dumbphones continue to sell very, very well.

There's clearly a market for an iPhone Nano.

None of this means Apple will do it. They may well ignore this market for any number of reasons, like they've ignored the market for a headless iMac. I will not be surprised if Apple decides to release an iPhone Nano, but nor am I arguing that they are going to do so.

I am simply arguing that there is a market for such a product, and that anyone that cannot see that market is blind.

Whether Apple chooses to respond to that market is another issue entirely...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.