Am I the only one who absolutely hates in-ear headphones?![]()
Yes... I love them
Am I the only one who absolutely hates in-ear headphones?![]()
I dont think apple will do this...
----------
Well there in ear ear buds cost $70 so they probably would
----------
I love the new one... They is awesome!
Agreed. The originals weren't a favorite with me, but the new ones I can't even get to stay in my ears.
Such a tough product to get right for all. I hated the original earbuds but like the new earPods so much that I have some at home, at work, and in my vehicle.
My thoughts exactly. The fact that this patent was applied for in 2007 BEFORE the iPhone was even released, shows exactly how far Apple is looking ahead. 7 years later, biometrics is becoming all the rage.
Also, I wonder if sometimes the "anonymous" sources are Apple themselves, such as with the iWatch. This allows other companies to "get the jump" on Apple and beat them to market, but all it does it lets Apple sit back and watch as they clumsily try to innovate, thus letting Apple see what DOESN'T work. Basically, letting competitors be the focus group. Then 2 years later, Apple comes out with their devices that are refined and make non of the mistakes that others did.
It could mean an ugly split connector at the end of the earpods though.
Nonsense, for several medical reasons.
Not least of which is you can't measure blood pressure in your ear.
I used to work for a company and every summer the CEO would have is new crop of Ivy League interns. I would take the tiny tots out to lunch and ask them the same question: What percentage of the US population over 25 years old have a 4 year degree. Without fail, they would all say a number north of 40%. The real number is around 25% and has been so forever.
What's my point? People who live in a bubble have a hard time imagining what life is like outside that bubble. The people at Apple are highly educated people, earning way above the US median income amount and are probably not as fat, on average, as the rest of the country. When you look at the stats for exercise and body fat in the US, it's hard to make a case for something like a biometric sensor earbud.
Get out of the bubble and stop dreaming up stuff that only you and the rest of your $100 yoga pants wearing set will give two dog farts about!
Who's spending $70 on the "in-ear headphones" when you can get the "ear pods" for free (or $20)?
EarPods are actually really great IMO. Looking to plunk down the cash for a set of in-ear Bose noise cancelling ones as I travel a lot, but as generic headphones go, EarPods are the best.
AND they come with the phone....win-win.
This seems too cynical. You could make the same argument for any company that addresses a certain market. Maybe they work in a "bubble" but it could also be said that they simply have a good feel for who buys their products. In any case, why criticize a product that doesn't exist, and may never exist? If the concept has problems, then that's a different issue than saying it's targeted at the wrong sort of people.
Any professional musician for starters. I have custom made 'buds' with Sennheiser IE-9. That's probably $500 worth of headphones. The new Apple buds are much better than the old ones, but there are still NO match.
And as for Beats headphones, don't even get me started. Those are toys! But what do you expect from a what used to be a cable company...
Any professional musician for starters. I have custom made 'buds' with Sennheiser IE-9. That's probably $500 worth of headphones. The new Apple buds are much better than the old ones, but there are still NO match.
And as for Beats headphones, don't even get me started. Those are toys! But what do you expect from a what used to be a cable company...
Android had used the "phablet" form factor since 2011 and the "new" "magical" flat UI since 2012.With this and the larger screen, I just might consider going back from Android. . .
OR at least owning the iPhone as a second device.
I don't think he's being too cynical at all.
I follow Apple very closely and feel I have a very good understanding of their motives and decisions at every turn.
The Fitness focus of iOS 8 (and presumably iWatch to boot) really stumps me, as it makes Apple seem (in my eyes) incredibly out of touch with their target market.
So I need two pairs of headphones, or a pair with two connectors?
There is a pretty great bbc episode explaining future biometric possibilities, one notable is being able to adjust your life style based on what you know right at that moment in time.Perhaps i'm not that clever or maybe i'm just not the right target but i don't understand the increased attention on biometric sensors in our portable devices. I don't need a watch, phone, or pair of earbuds to tell me i'm fat; mirrors can do that for me already. I've also managed to live my entire life without needing to know my exact heart rate and blood pressure at any given moment. Outside of athletes and perhaps hypochondriacs, who would this appeal to?
I used to work for a company and every summer the CEO would have is new crop of Ivy League interns. I would take the tiny tots out to lunch and ask them the same question: What percentage of the US population over 25 years old have a 4 year degree. Without fail, they would all say a number north of 40%. The real number is around 25% and has been so forever.
What's my point? People who live in a bubble have a hard time imagining what life is like outside that bubble. The people at Apple are highly educated people, earning way above the US median income amount and are probably not as fat, on average, as the rest of the country. When you look at the stats for exercise and body fat in the US, it's hard to make a case for something like a biometric sensor earbud.
Get out of the bubble and stop dreaming up stuff that only you and the rest of your $100 yoga pants wearing set will give two dog farts about!