So, the current iPad is THE BEST Apple can make?
So you are stating now as a fact, Apple are, today unable to fit a flash unit into the back of an iPad, which, by any definition would make it better than not having one.
This is, you are saying beyond Apple's ability as of today, and an iPad without a Flash is the best they can manage. yes?
By all means use another term, but BEST is meaningless.
You can use the term BETTER, that is a good and correct term, todays iPad is technically better than the last iPad.
However, also the current iPad is weaker and less strong than the 1st iPad, so iPad1 could be considered the BEST for strength, and iPad Air 2 is not the best in that aspect.
So I will say again you should stop if you don't want to continue looking foolish.
Sorry, but you are the foolish one, for not understanding "Best"
Aluminium is the best material for a plane?
What sort of plane? a glider, a human powered plane?
Note: We are not speaking of a material here, you can have the best material for a precise given task, however when it comes to a collection of parts to create a general purpose device then the term best becomes meaningless, as it's just does this product meet your list of requirement.
Perhaps Titanium would be best for the shell, but it's too expensive and harder to machine so they don't use it.
Apple making $200 profit could be their goal, so making that amount of profit would be best for them, not the best product.
Sorry, you need to use a different term as best only means meeting the goal you placed for yourself.
I can say I want to create a car for $100 and I do, it's the best car I can make for $100, and I have reached my goal in doing so, but it does not mean it's the best car I can make.
Perhaps that is where you are getting so confused.
..if you don't like the iPad or the apps then use something you actually like so you don't sound so miserable and come here to trash talk Apple products.
That Macs can't be used with multi touch or any other on screen interface is a paradigm. With a nice VESA mount you can adjust the angle and orientation of a 27" iMac to place it in any ergonomic way you want it to be.No I don't think so, today Apple have once again commented on this with the following
"While Microsoft and others now believe that multi-touch should extend to the desktop display, Apple believes this is dead wrong. “From the ergonomic standpoint we have studied this pretty extensively and we believe that on a desktop scenario where you have a fixed keyboard, having to reach up to do touch interfaces is uncomfortable,” says Schiller. “iOS from its start has been designed as a multi-touch experience — you don’t have the things you have in a mouse-driven interface, like a cursor to move around, or teeny little ‘close’ boxes that you can’t hit with your finger. The Mac OS has been designed from day one for an indirect pointing mechanism. These two worlds are different on purpose, and that’s a good thing — we can optimize around the best experience for each and not try to mesh them together into a least-common-denominator experience.”
https://medium.com/backchannel/excl...ill-sweating-the-details-on-imac-531a95e50c91
I don't think Apple will be entering into the surface type market at least for a while.
I disagree with you so I wish to silence you. The totalitarian impulse
Compelling speculation here:
http://www.zdnet.com/article/ipad-pro-macbook-2-in-1-hybrid-tablet-laptop/
I'm speaking of the word best. You wanted to start an argument about how the word best is meaningless and that there is no such thing as best. You even said it is an artificial term. Now according you there can be best in materials for a given task but not a product?
So, Apple shows off how powerful the ipad pro is with a video editing demo and then fails to provide a pointer device or access to off board storage to do video editing? This product, and ios, really needs some further evolution.
I disagree with you so I wish to silence you. The totalitarian impulseHow many years have iPads been out? How many years have tablets been out? Apple currently makes the best tablets to date. How many years people like you have been saying the same thing over and over again that with each new iPad it's just the same as the previous one? The sales numbers year after year speaks for it self! The iPad has powerful yet simple to use apps and if you don't like the iPad or the apps then use something you actually like so you don't sound so miserable and come here to trash talk Apple products.
I disagree with you telling posters that if they don't like the ipad pro then use something else and dont post hereIt would be helpful if you quote my entire post and actually state what you disagree with. Or maybe you're just trolling.
No I don't think so, today Apple have once again commented on this with the following
"While Microsoft and others now believe that multi-touch should extend to the desktop display, Apple believes this is dead wrong. “From the ergonomic standpoint we have studied this pretty extensively and we believe that on a desktop scenario where you have a fixed keyboard, having to reach up to do touch interfaces is uncomfortable,” says Schiller. “iOS from its start has been designed as a multi-touch experience — you don’t have the things you have in a mouse-driven interface, like a cursor to move around, or teeny little ‘close’ boxes that you can’t hit with your finger. The Mac OS has been designed from day one for an indirect pointing mechanism. These two worlds are different on purpose, and that’s a good thing — we can optimize around the best experience for each and not try to mesh them together into a least-common-denominator experience. .
I honestly really want the hybrid. That would be amazingI am biased to Apple products; however, the Surface Book makes me frustrated at Apple. Something Microsoft did first in this department is made the tablet and laptop one, down to every detail, and kept it stylish and functional at the same time. Does anyone think Apple will ever get around to doing this? I dislike the Windows OS, so no Surface Book for me. But the design looks amazing. This is something Apple should've done a long time ago. I'm talking about a fully functional, touchscreen Macbook on OS X with a detachable screen that becomes an "iPad" while still running on OS X.
Any idea why this product has not yet been made and do you think we'll see it sometime in the future?
A few of us have been beating that drum. Glad to see another "convert".I still contend that for some/many, adding pointing device support would go a long way toward moving the iPad closer to that point of convergence... certainly more than a magic crayon or pencil.