Murray won a five set thriller today, which ended under the roof.
yep, he came back and won it.
Murray won a five set thriller today, which ended under the roof.
do they have lights now? they don't do they?
On Centre Court when the roof is closed, yes.
yep. yesterday was the first use, right? and the thing cost what, $150 million?
£80m is all I've heard/read everywhere.Costs is reported as being £40-£80 million.
£80m is all I've heard/read everywhere.
Not quite sure how exactly you blow £80m on 1 relatively small sliding roof![]()
![]()
£80m is all I've heard/read everywhere.
Not quite sure how exactly you blow £80m on 1 relatively small sliding roof![]()
![]()
I know, I know...This is England, what do you expect?![]()
It's a small roof covering a tennis court, not a football field. How can they have made it weigh 3000 tonnes!?If the reports it weighs 3000 tonnes are right some very serious structural work must have gone into it.
I know, I know...
It's a small roof covering a tennis court, not a football field. How can they have made it weigh 3000 tonnes!?
In the region of £798 million. However, it's obviously going to cost more than putting a roof on Wimbledon because:Speaking of "how much" what did Wembley cost again?
In the region of £798 million. However, it's obviously going to cost more than putting a roof on Wimbledon because:
- We're talking about building a new 90,000-seater stadium from scratch, rather than expanding the capacity of a tennis court by a few thousand and adding a roof.
In the region of £798 million. However, it's obviously going to cost more than putting a roof on Wimbledon because:
- We're talking about building a new 90,000-seater stadium from scratch, rather than expanding the capacity of a tennis court by a few thousand and adding a roof.
- The FA were in charge.
Ah, but as Peterkro says those dastardly Aussies ripped us off.It always amuses me that they were able to build the Millennium Stadium in Cardiff for only £121 Million...
I thought Wembley was fine, myself.[The Millennium Stadium] may not look horrible and cheap on the inside like Wembley does (I've never been to Cardiff but have been in Wembley).
Hewitt is going well. won his first three rounds in straight sets and then came back to beat Stepanek in five with a groin. hopefully he gets good and beats Roddick.
Ah, but as Peterkro says those dastardly Aussies ripped us off.I think the fact that the project overran so much added to the final cost as well and does the Wembley bill include the not inconsiderable task of demolishing the old Stadium at the site?
I thought Wembley was fine, myself.
I'm sure the Welsh would have quite happily demolished Wembley for us as well.Not sure but the Welsh had to demolish Cardiff Arms Park to build on the same site...
The same is true with most football stadia you go to – I actually thought Wembley's compared very favourably with other grounds. Mind, I'm sure it's a bit posher at Wimbledon – mahogany and exposed gemstones is more likely the order of the day.Really? It's all concrete breeze-blocks and exposed metal inside where the beer/food stalls are. I expected more for the cost!
If the reports it weighs 3000 tonnes are right some very serious structural work must have gone into it.
Hewitt is going well. won his first three rounds in straight sets and then came back to beat Stepanek in five with a groin. hopefully he gets good and beats Roddick.
And Haas is 1 set to love up against Djokovic
yeah, i'm pulling for Roddick, but he might have trouble with Hewitt
Haas is up 2 sets to 1 right now