Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Great. So we agree on the destination but disagree on the path. I still think you can separate the Xbox division because Microsoft had a gaming division before Xbox, which was profitable without xbox. XBox, alone, is not profitable. It doesn’t matter if it’s integral to their strategy (which I agree) but rather that at many other companies, such as Samsung, they would have killed it years ago because it doesn’t generate a profit.

Which I suspect we can both agree is an example of foresight over in Redmond. They can see the value of Xbox’s impact on other parts of their business. The non-Xbox parts of their gaming division do not need Xbox to make a profit but they do better because Xbox exists. So while Xbox, doesn’t make them money directly it allows them presence in a market that would otherwise me lost.

I just think it’s misleading to claim Xbox is profitable when it’s not. It would be like claiming Apple’s Ping! Social Network service was profitable because it was part of the iTunes division.
Unless you have data otherwise I believe the Xbox division is now profitable. For years it was not but I thinks they dug out of that a few years ago. Also Game Pass subscribers just passed 23 million and is rapidly growing. It is not a cheap subscription.
 
So if you have to run a Windows app on a Mac so often……why have a Mac? Or why not have a PC as well?
Because I like MacOS. It's only at home though, I only use Windows at work. I have 2 Macs and 2 Windows machines at home, but I tend not to switch machines if I can do what I need on whatever machine I'm using at the time.

I know LOTS of Mac users. One of them still runs a Windows VM for Qucikbooks. He is fiannly moving to the Mac version because he wants a M1 Mac. All the other Mac users I know do not run Windows on their Mac’s. I bet most don’t know you can/could.
You apparently don't know any Mac users anywhere close to where I live or that work in businesses like I work in. :)
 
I just can't fall into the unlicensed trap and I will post the same to others. It's up to them to break, or not to break, the EULA of course, at least my conscience is clear on the issue.

I'm not sure what unlicensed trap you are referring to. You can by Windows10 directly from Microsoft and their EULA allows for using a VM:

Device. In this agreement, “device” means a hardware system (whether physical or virtual) with an internal storage device capable of running the software. A hardware partition or blade is considered to be a device.

Why do you even have a Mac if Windows is so important to you?

I have not run Windows on a Mac via boot camp in 7 years or more. I think I had a Windows VM 5 years ago to run some app, can’t remember what it was now??

There is zero need to run Windows on a Mac in 2021. So much stuff is web based, is also on Mac or has great alternatives on Mac.

Different people have different use cases. In my case, I need to be able to verify compatibility with Office's Windows versions and run PowerBI, both of which require Windows.

As for great alternatives, there are some but often are not 100% compatible; which can be a show stopper. In some cases, the Mac version features are a subset of the Windows version, in others, such as PowerBI Desktop, they simply do not exist.

Do you really think Microsoft cares about the TINY number of Windows sales to boot camp users? It’s rounding error at best.

Besides boot camp is gone going forward on M series Mac’s. Apple dropped it. Why? Because they know it is hardly used by Mac users anymore.

MS does, however, market Windows 10 for Mac users on their store.

So if you have to run a Windows app on a Mac so often……why have a Mac? Or why not have a PC as well?

Because using 2 machines is a royal PITA; especially for checking compatibility.

With a VM I simply open the file in the Windows VM, if I make an edit it's saved right on my Mac. On a separate PC it's either upload to cloud storage, email, jump drive, etc.

I had an HP Envy for a while. Very nice, well built machine with a mid range Ryzen processor; and a Dell a client issued me to access their network. Parallels Geekbench was as fast on my Mac as on those machines, so I took no performance hit with the apps I use (I don't game).

Having traveled with 2 PCs, it's a real hassle to drag them through security where even with Pre you still have to take both out, plus all extra weight in your bag to lug.

I know LOTS of Mac users. One of them still runs a Windows VM for Qucikbooks. He is fiannly moving to the Mac version because he wants a M1 Mac. All the other Mac users I know do not run Windows on their Mac’s. I bet most don’t know you can/could.

Most people don't know a lot of things the Mac can do, but that doesn't mean there aren't users for whom a capability is important.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure what unlicensed trap you are referring to. You can by Windows10 directly from Microsoft and their EULA allows for using a VM:
x86/x64 Windows, yes, I can and do own licenses.

Windows on Arm, it's not possible to own licenses to run in a VM as you cannot purchase them, they only come with OEM hardware. That's mainly what this discussion is about, running Windows on Arm on Parallels running on an M1 Mac.
 
x86/x64 Windows, yes, I can and do own licenses.

Windows on Arm, it's not possible to own licenses to run in a VM as you cannot purchase them, they only come with OEM hardware. That's mainly what this discussion is about, running Windows on Arm on Parallels running on an M1 Mac.
I get what you’re saying here, or at least why you’re saying it. But what I find odd is that I used an old Windows 10 Pro license that I purchased in 2018, and am using it to license a Windows 10 Pro ARM VM created with the initial Parallels Tech Preview for the M1 Macs. And then just recently updated to Win11. Yes, Parallels is able to run it all, and do it well. But it’s Microsoft that’s accepted the use of the License Key I purchased from them. Not Parallels. If that were to break some kind of “agreement” with Microsoft, you’d think they’d have a better system in place to detect the CPU in use for that (virtual) machine. The “About” section clearly shows it’s the ARM version. If they don’t allow it, why did they…. allow it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: agoodpub
x86/x64 Windows, yes, I can and do own licenses.

Windows on Arm, it's not possible to own licenses to run in a VM as you cannot purchase them, they only come with OEM hardware. That's mainly what this discussion is about, running Windows on Arm on Parallels running on an M1 Mac.
Thanks. There's been so many twists and turns in this discussion it's hard to keep track of who meant what. I hope MS does license ARM Windows for retail use; but don't see that in the near future. When I upgrade I guess my old MBP will become a dedicated Windows machine or at least Bootcamped so I can run PowerBI and Office when needed.
 
Thanks. There's been so many twists and turns in this discussion it's hard to keep track of who meant what. I hope MS does license ARM Windows for retail use; but don't see that in the near future.
I sure hope so too! I too think it's a long shot near term. Microsoft is trying to control WoA like Apple does with the M1, and you can't even run a M1 MacOS VM on an M1 Mac...
 
Have seen the list of CPU’s this version runs on? Microsoft has cut out anything prior to 2018. They probably cave and change that but the current list is 8th gen Intel or higher plus TPM 2.0

Well I guess my 4th-gen Intel i7-4790K PC is out... even though it runs Windows 10 perfectly today. :p

Oh well... I'll be building a new Ryzen PC eventually. I'm not in a hurry though. My current PC works just fine.

But my next laptop purchase will be an M1 Macbook Air. That's what I'm most excited about. It'll be my first Mac! I can't wait to experience MacOS.

Windows 11 will have to wait until I build a new desktop PC... someday...

:)
 
I sure hope so too! I too think it's a long shot near term. Microsoft is trying to control WoA like Apple does with the M1, and you can't even run a M1 MacOS VM on an M1 Mac...
Oh yeah that kills off ALL legacy app support. Gotta keep a Windows 10 PC around like forever. (iTunes 12.6.5.3)
 
Yeah but for many personal users, just activating it is good enough.
More like they aren't worth going after. Microsoft could kill it for everyone easily enough just by closing the insider program for WoA, but they're syphoning beta OS information off of us with it, so that's *probably* not going to happen.

Windows 11 already says when Win11 goes GA, your install will become unworkable and you'll have to revert to your old Win10 install, which you wont be able to do because that insider program will be closed too. Now, they probably will make a new insider program for GA Win11, but nothing has been announced yet.

BTW, that's the key to understanding the WoA license -- try to buy a license for it -- you can't, it only comes with OEM hardware.
 
More like they aren't worth going after. Microsoft could kill it for everyone easily enough just by closing the insider program for WoA, but they're syphoning beta OS information off of us with it, so that's *probably* not going to happen.

Windows 11 already says when Win11 goes GA, your install will become unworkable and you'll have to revert to your old Win10 install, which you wont be able to do because that insider program will be closed too. Now, they probably will make a new insider program for GA Win11, but nothing has been announced yet.

BTW, that's the key to understanding the WoA license -- try to buy a license for it -- you can't, it only comes with OEM hardware.
Wait, so does it mean Microsoft will essentially render all insider build of Windows on Mac (through VM) inoperable once Windows 11 goes to general availability?
 
I don't understand what you're saying here at all and it doesn't go with what I said.
Not being able to virtualise macOS on M1 Mac means several years down the line, applications that are developed today would no longer be usable because the supported macOS version where those application could run can no longer be installed on new macs.

Think of it like this: imagine on Windows 11, VMware can no longer allow users to install virtualised Windows XP on it because Microsoft says no.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gank41
Unless you have data otherwise I believe the Xbox division is now profitable. For years it was not but I thinks they dug out of that a few years ago. Also Game Pass subscribers just passed 23 million and is rapidly growing. It is not a cheap subscription.
L
Because I like MacOS. It's only at home though, I only use Windows at work. I have 2 Macs and 2 Windows machines at home, but I tend not to switch machines if I can do what I need on whatever machine I'm using at the time.


You apparently don't know any Mac users anywhere close to where I live or that work in businesses like I work in. :)
Probably not where you live no. Working in IT at a company with just over 5K employees we have around 300 Mac’s? Zero run Windows on a Mac in at format. 99% Of those users do not have a Windows computer either.

Of the Mac people I know outside of work, friends and family, a few have Windows PC’s dedicated to PC gaming and they do all other “Computing” on their Mac’s.

Don’t get me wrong there was a time when boot camp was a much more popular thing. When there was a “must have” Windows app. I ran boot camp even Fusion that would use the boot camp partition. Visio was my must have app before switching to Omnigraffle. I also used it to test Windows server/AD stuff in a sanboxed VM lab.

I still do the VM lab stuff but in ESXi lab now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gank41
Don’t get me wrong there was a time when boot camp was a much more popular thing. When there was a “must have” Windows app. I ran boot camp even Fusion that would use the boot camp partition.

I'm not sure bootcamp was ever that big; it allowed Apple to promote switching without giving up Windows; but I'd be surprised if it was every actually used in any large numbers compared to teh number of Macs in teh wild.

Visio was my must have app before switching to Omnigraffle.

OmniGraffle is nice and I use it, but their Visio compatibility leaves a lot to be desired. Any files always seemed to get mangled in translation.
 
Not being able to virtualise macOS on M1 Mac means several years down the line, applications that are developed today would no longer be usable because the supported macOS version where those application could run can no longer be installed on new macs.

Think of it like this: imagine on Windows 11, VMware can no longer allow users to install virtualised Windows XP on it because Microsoft says no.
But that's not happening, just the OS on *Arm hardware* is what they are controlling, not what runs in the OS.
 
Probably not where you live no. Working in IT at a company with just over 5K employees we have around 300 Mac’s? Zero run Windows on a Mac in at format. 99% Of those users do not have a Windows computer either.
There's the difference, I don't work at an IT company, just a manufacturer that doesn't make computers -- me and the head electrician are the only computer geeks in the whole company. Normals don't care about OS, they just want a computer like what they use at work and what they use at work is Windows. And fwiw, that electrician doesn't use a Mac either, he runs Linux.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shirasaki
Unless you have data otherwise I believe the Xbox division is now profitable. For years it was not but I thinks they dug out of that a few years ago. Also Game Pass subscribers just passed 23 million and is rapidly growing. It is not a cheap subscription.
I think the issue we were running into with the previous discussion was what qualifies as part of the Xbox division vs the collective Microsoft Gaming. Microsoft has been very careful about its wording when describing revenue, which is reasonable behavior for a publicly-traded company. MS gaming is profitable, I agree, but I have not been convinced the Xbox division itself would survive if spun off into its own company. The question is, is Game Pass part of the Xbox division, or their overarching Gaming Division that Xbox is part of. The inclusion of PC Game Pass makes me think it compliments Xbox, but shouldn't be treated as part of it.

As jlc1978 pointed out, as interesting as I find the topic, it really is just sematics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gank41
  • Like
Reactions: gank41
That's only for the x86/x64 version -- try and buy the Arm version from that...

fwiw, the "for Mac" page talks only about bootcamp, which is not possible on an M1 Mac.
Well, again, fwiw I’m able to use the key I purchased from Microsoft for Windows 10 Pro and Activate an ARM version of Win10 in a VM. And yes I understand the difference between Activation and Licensing. But considering the differences in the agreement like being able to use your product key twice if both Activations are VM’s. Which is great, by the way, being able to set up a machine a specific way and then clone it and reactivate. I don’t see Microsoft just flipping a switch and rendering a decent install base useless just because a beta testing period might be completed. I’m sure they’ll offer a path. Or something. It’s their business.

I’ve always found it funny/sad to still see the BootCamp app still being installed on the M1 Macs 🤣 Maybe we’ll get to use it at some point. Maybe things will change when we get closer to both a Windows 10 and macOS 12 release..
 
My main Mac is an Intel Mac Mini that is quite capable of running multiple VM's. :)

I've only tried things like crossover on my M1 Mac, and when I'm using Linux.

multiple? things must have changed. Running a VM on a laptop makes it lame , maybe you have too much RAM on that mini.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.