500 million iOS devices were sold and yet, no one is bitching about the lack of ethernet jacks.
True. There have, however, been complaints why the lighting port on the iPhone doesn't support USB 3.0 speeds to speed up e.g. movie transfers from iTunes. What these people fail to understand is that the rest of the hardware in an iPhone (CPU, flash memory, internal interfaces) wouldn't be able to keep up with that speed anyway. These devices were designed for extreme power efficiency, not to act as file servers. The same goes for the Apple TV, which is based on the same platform.Just out of curiosity, why are iOS devices relevant in this?
iPhones & iPads of course don't have ethernet, they are portable devices (an Apple TV is a set top box)
That's a really odd thing to throw in to your argument there...
True. There have, however, been complaints why the lighting port on the iPhone doesn't support USB 3.0 speeds to speed up e.g. movie transfers from iTunes. What these people fail to understand is that the rest of the hardware in an iPhone (CPU, flash memory, internal interfaces) wouldn't be able to keep up with that speed anyway. These devices were designed for extreme power efficiency, not to act as file servers. The same goes for the Apple TV.
I disagree. I want minimal standby power consumption and no fan in my living room (which is why I will not get a Roku 4 even though it's otherwise a great device by all reports).Regarding ATV - I'm not sure that "extreme power efficiency" is really relevant to a set top box that's plugged in 24/7. The power usage increase is a total non factor in this debate.
I want minimal standby power consumption and no fan in my living room
Yes I have. My employer makes, among other things, Ethernet phy chips. You'd also have to beef up other parts of the platform, which would further increase power consumption. And there is simply no reason to do that on an Apple TV.Why do you assume a fan would be needed simply for gigabit ethernet?
Do you have some data on that?
Nope, I bought the Nvidia Shield and AppleTV on Friday.Actually most comparable streaming boxes don't, including the latest 4K FireTV and Roku. The Nvidia Shield does, but it's a significantly larger box with a fan that can get noisy.
More like Magic iEthernet^ and I'm sure it will be named Lighting Ethernet and people will salivate over it.
I have Shield too and it can get pretty noisy when the fan spins up.Nope, I bought the Nvidia Shield and AppleTV on Friday.
Nvidia Shield is just as silent as the AppleTV. (Both do not make a sound.)
I don't disagree that the hardware is more powerful. But that doesn't make it a better product for what I want to use it for anymore than a fat gamer laptop isn't better than a lightweight ultrabook when portability is the goal.I WANTED to like the AppleTV more, but the Nvidia shield is a superior machine in terms of hardware
I agree. But it has nothing to do with the 10/100 Ethernet port.AppleTV is a major let down for me
Yes I have. My employer makes, among other things, Ethernet phy chips. You'd also have to beef up other parts of the platform, which would further increase power consumption. And there is simply no reason to do that on an Apple TV.
Well, the fact is that if I'm wired to ethernet, according to the speedtest app on my Apple TV, I get about 30-40mbps. On wifi, I'm well over 120mbps. Gigabit ethernet would of been nice, especially for streaming from my iMac.
I don't know about you, but I don't want a device the size of an iPad Pro in my equipment rack.Apparently it won't be an issue to bump up to USB3 speeds on the portable and battery powered iPad Pro and keep excellent power consumption. Kudos to Apple, right?![]()
...and if Gigabit comes in the next update, the same people saying "what's the point" and "you don't need it" will be here hailing it as "awesome to have! Way to go Apple! The best gets better!", etc, etc.
I love Apple stuff, but the lengths some people will go to defend every single thing they do is so nauseating.
I don't want a device the size of an iPad Pro in my equipment rack.
To be honest, I'm not going to run cat-5 into my living room (Time Capsule is in the den), so I actually appreciate the ac wifi and don't need gigabit ethernet.
To be honest, I'm not going to run cat-5 into my living room (Time Capsule is in the den), so I actually appreciate the ac wifi and don't need gigabit ethernet.
That's great!I could care less the size of the Apple TV - I haven't even laid eyes on my ATV3 in about 2 months as it's in the AV setup and tucked away with acres of space to spare.
I disagree. I want minimal standby power consumption and no fan in my living room (which is why I will not get a Roku 4 even though it's otherwise a great device by all reports).
Why do you assume a fan would be needed simply for gigabit ethernet?
Do you have some data on that?
That's great!
Since you don't need it I guess we're done here...
This x 100000000....and if Gigabit comes in the next update, the same people saying "what's the point" and "you don't need it" will be here hailing it as "awesome to have! Way to go Apple! The best gets better!", etc, etc.
I love Apple stuff, but the lengths some people will go to defend every single thing they do is so nauseating.