Yep.You "need" the Apple TV to be as small as possible?
What exactly did you "need" the GigE for again?
Yep.You "need" the Apple TV to be as small as possible?
May have a point, the AirPort Extreme with gigabit ethernet has a fan in it. However on the flip side not many people know that because its completely inaudible unless you have your ear in physical contact with the device.
Yep.
What exactly did you "need" the GigE for again?
Yep.
What exactly did you "need" the GigE for again?
What can you stream to an Apple TV that requires more than 120Mbps?Personally, I need gigabit for my 300mbps internet connection and for streaming from my iMac. I only get about 120mbps with the current wifi. I haven't upgraded to an AC router yet, but until I do, it would of been REAL nice to have gigabit.
Well, I'm not.
I notice you haven't answered the question. What exactly do you think GigE would accomplish in an Apple TV? Why should it include hardware that not only costs more but also consumes significantly more power if the device doesn't do anything that can utilize it? And why stop at GigE (which, BTW, was also developed in the 90s)? You could just as well demand a 10Gbps port.
What can you stream to an Apple TV that requires more than 120Mbps?
You said streaming, not downloading. Even Blu-ray tops out at 50Mbps, so what exactly is it that you want to stream?Really? If I had full access to my 300Mbps connection on the apple TV, then all download times would be cut in half. Maybe you don't value time, but I do![]()
Apple's contribution and thoughtful design with climate control in mind?
If it was a battery depended device, sure. But I recall plugging a cord into an outlet to power it.
Are we talking 15W or .25W
Check your units.The difference would be in millivolts.
Yes, and that's precisely because they paid attention to the power consumption of all components. The Nvidia Shield, in comparison, draws about 10W and requires active cooling because of that.The AppleTV while streaming doesn't even use 2w, likely .01-.0.3w if even that.
The Nvidia Shield requires active cooling because its a Quad Core CPU with a significantly more powerful GPU not because of 1000 ethernet.Check your units.
Yes, and that's precisely because they paid attention to the power consumption of all components. The Nvidia Shield, in comparison, draws about 10W and requires active cooling because of that.
That was widely speculated to be for product similarity with the Time Capsule of the same design that needed the fan for the hard drive in it - not the ethernet.
I wonder how those $20 5-port gigabit switches in such small closed boxes are not exploding because no cooling or venting.Without having mechanical cooling it would need some sort of open air design.
Have you ever done hardware design? All components must be matched. For example, to make proper use of a GigE Phy you need a CPU can run the protocol stack at 1Gbps line speed as well as fast enough storage if you are downloading at that speed, otherwise you just wasted resources for nothing. Putting a GigE Phy into a low-power platform like the Apple TV would likely require other components to be upgraded as well, which in turn would increase the power consumption even more than just the GigE chip.The Nvidia Shield requires active cooling because its a Quad Core CPU with a significantly more powerful GPU not because of 1000 ethernet.
You don't know that. I think the hardware engineers at Apple know what they are doing when it comes to efficient designs (while I wouldn't necessarily say the same about the software guysAppleTV could have gigabit ethernet and it would have nearly zero impact on heat, electricity consumption, the only negative impact would be on Apple's profit margin.
I wonder how those $20 5-port gigabit switches in such small closed boxes are not exploding because no cooling or venting.![]()
What exactly did you "need" the GigE for again?
What can you stream to an Apple TV that requires more than 120Mbps?
Really? If I had full access to my 300Mbps connection on the apple TV, then all download times would be cut in half. Maybe you don't value time, but I do
Guess I never realized how many people will tongue Apple's balls for any reason what so ever.
This is pointless, they cut corners so that they could try to make 12 billion next quarter instead of 11 billion.
That's the reason.
AppleTV is just another streaming box, that doesn't even compare to other boxes currently available, hardware or even software wise.
It was hyped and pumped to be this wonderful next gen tech by Apple, and it is clearly not.
It probably would have been had Jobs been alive but alas he is not and Apple now is all about hype now.
At least Jobs usually delivered on the hype.
Love that gif, nicely played![]()
Also I'd like to see you address Menel's common sense post at #5 that you conveniently seemed to have avoided responding to...
Yes as of right this minute there are very few (though some) reasons for anything faster than 10/100 but that could change in the next year or 2. Why limit the hardware?