Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
May have a point, the AirPort Extreme with gigabit ethernet has a fan in it. However on the flip side not many people know that because its completely inaudible unless you have your ear in physical contact with the device.

That was widely speculated to be for product similarity with the Time Capsule of the same design that needed the fan for the hard drive in it - not the ethernet.
 
Personally, I need gigabit for my 300mbps internet connection and for streaming from my iMac. I only get about 120mbps with the current wifi. I haven't upgraded to an AC router yet, but until I do, it would of been REAL nice to have gigabit.
What can you stream to an Apple TV that requires more than 120Mbps?
 
Well, I'm not.
I notice you haven't answered the question. What exactly do you think GigE would accomplish in an Apple TV? Why should it include hardware that not only costs more but also consumes significantly more power if the device doesn't do anything that can utilize it? And why stop at GigE (which, BTW, was also developed in the 90s)? You could just as well demand a 10Gbps port.

Apple's contribution and thoughtful design with climate control in mind?
If it was a battery depended device, sure. But I recall plugging a cord into an outlet to power it.
Are we talking 15W or .25W
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
What can you stream to an Apple TV that requires more than 120Mbps?

Really? If I had full access to my 300Mbps connection on the apple TV, then all download times would be cut in half. Maybe you don't value time, but I do ;)
 
Really? If I had full access to my 300Mbps connection on the apple TV, then all download times would be cut in half. Maybe you don't value time, but I do ;)
You said streaming, not downloading. Even Blu-ray tops out at 50Mbps, so what exactly is it that you want to stream?
 
The difference would be in millivolts.
Check your units. :p
The AppleTV while streaming doesn't even use 2w, likely .01-.0.3w if even that.
Yes, and that's precisely because they paid attention to the power consumption of all components. The Nvidia Shield, in comparison, draws about 10W and requires active cooling because of that.
 
Check your units. :p
Yes, and that's precisely because they paid attention to the power consumption of all components. The Nvidia Shield, in comparison, draws about 10W and requires active cooling because of that.
The Nvidia Shield requires active cooling because its a Quad Core CPU with a significantly more powerful GPU not because of 1000 ethernet.

AppleTV could have gigabit ethernet and it would have nearly zero impact on heat, electricity consumption, the only negative impact would be on Apple's profit margin.
 
That was widely speculated to be for product similarity with the Time Capsule of the same design that needed the fan for the hard drive in it - not the ethernet.

I would say that's clearly speculation. If they completely omit the hard drive connectors in the extreme model by using a different logic to save a couple cents then they would have omitted the fan if it wasnt required.

Besides look at the size of the heat sinks ontop of the logic board and the gigabit ethernet controller. Red box.

image.jpeg
image.jpeg
 
According to this...

http://www.intel.com/design/network/products/lan/controllers/82541pi.htm

That particular gigabit controller uses around 1w at 1000mbs and .3w at 100mbs. That's pretty significant for a single chip.

Without having mechanical cooling it would need some sort of open air design. The design already got bigger to accommodate that massive heat sink.

image.jpeg

No telling if that's enough for even more heat.
 
Last edited:
On my ATV4 I have compared wireless and Ethernet both connected to an Airport Time Capsule network. With Ethernet I am getting speedtest results of 75/18 and with WiFi I get 65/18 so no big difference. Everything appears to be streaming fine and have no apparent lag in anything including streaming from my iMacs. I have Gigabit Ethernet switches and wiring (Cat5e and Cat6 cables) to connect the majority of my devices by Ethernet, so only have a few devices that connect via WiFi. My IP Security Cameras work far better over ethernet than they did over WiFi.

Rather than complain about Apple penny pinching (or cent pinching) I would be more concerned with the prices many people appear to be getting charged for their broadband. I am paying £24 a month for line rental, superspeed broadband 70/15 (and am getting higher than that most of the time), unlimited downloads and free weekend telephone calls.

Feels like early days with the ATV4 and think there is loads of room for development and look forward to apps such as BBC iPlayer coming out and better SiRi integration in apps such as Netflix. Minor points that I do like is that the SiRi remote seems to work well with my TV system. One press and my TV wakes up and on comes the ATV4 on the correct channel. The same operation with my ATV3 took a few key presses on both my Tv remote and the ATV3 remote.
 
Last edited:
The Nvidia Shield requires active cooling because its a Quad Core CPU with a significantly more powerful GPU not because of 1000 ethernet.
Have you ever done hardware design? All components must be matched. For example, to make proper use of a GigE Phy you need a CPU can run the protocol stack at 1Gbps line speed as well as fast enough storage if you are downloading at that speed, otherwise you just wasted resources for nothing. Putting a GigE Phy into a low-power platform like the Apple TV would likely require other components to be upgraded as well, which in turn would increase the power consumption even more than just the GigE chip.
AppleTV could have gigabit ethernet and it would have nearly zero impact on heat, electricity consumption, the only negative impact would be on Apple's profit margin.
You don't know that. I think the hardware engineers at Apple know what they are doing when it comes to efficient designs (while I wouldn't necessarily say the same about the software guys :p).
 
What exactly did you "need" the GigE for again?

Very good question.

What can you stream to an Apple TV that requires more than 120Mbps?

Nothing. Unless a quarter of a second per video launch is going to give you enough free time to add a week to your life.

Really? If I had full access to my 300Mbps connection on the apple TV, then all download times would be cut in half. Maybe you don't value time, but I do

You just wasted a year's worth of Apple TV Gigabit ethernet time betterment in the time it took you to type this sentence. If you truly value your time this much, don't respond to this post either. Go enjoy the 0.25 seconds with your family. I'm sure you can squeeze half a hug or a whole smile in there.

BJ
 
Even a raw Blu-ray rip isn't going to push more than 40Mbps. Complaining about *only* having a 100Mbps Ethernet port is silly. There is nothing you are going to ever stream to your Apple TV that will ever max out the connection as-is. Furthermore, you are smoking crack if you think you'll ever get more than a few Mbps from an iTunes purchase/rental download, doesn't matter how fast your Internet connection is. Not to mention 4K streaming is only pushing 15Mbps. Might as well complain they didn't use 10GbE. :rolleyes:
 
Guess I never realized how many people will tongue Apple's balls for any reason what so ever.
This is pointless, they cut corners so that they could try to make 12 billion next quarter instead of 11 billion.
That's the reason.

AppleTV is just another streaming box, that doesn't even compare to other boxes currently available, hardware or even software wise.

You're awful worked up over something that doesn't make much of a difference to the few folks it affects and makes no difference at all to most other users.

It was hyped and pumped to be this wonderful next gen tech by Apple, and it is clearly not.
It probably would have been had Jobs been alive but alas he is not and Apple now is all about hype now.
At least Jobs usually delivered on the hype.

This is Apple were talking about. Putting an App Store on something that didn't have one before is "amazing and magical."

Also, the guy has been dead for 4 years now. Time to let it go.
 
When are you ever going to stream something above 100mbps?

The stuff people complain about here is ridiculous.
 
Just a side note.. the throughput of 1Gbit routers is not 1GBit, :) You can wire it up all you want, but that ac will give you the same throughput the wired connection gives you, and you couldn't even count the difference in latency or tcp/ip overhead. What you believe is happening vs reality seems to be quite .. mythical. sorry.
 
Yes as of right this minute there are very few (though some) reasons for anything faster than 10/100 but that could change in the next year or 2. Why limit the hardware?

Next gen 4k Bluray has a max bitrate of 100.

What video are you going to watch that is higher than that?

I've never had any issued with wifi anyways. Just use it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.