:( World of Warcraft - Cataclysm won't support PowerPC Macs

Discussion in 'Mac and PC Games' started by zeemeerman2, Aug 31, 2010.

  1. zeemeerman2 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2010
    #1
  2. Plutonius macrumors 603

    Plutonius

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Location:
    New Hampshire
    #2
    I would not be surprised. I'm not sure it would be playable even on a G5.
     
  3. cluthz macrumors 68040

    cluthz

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2004
    Location:
    Norway
    #3
    There are only a very few PPCs that could have run it at all, dual core G5s with non-stock graphics. (A G5 with Geforce 5200 can't run WoW properly)
    Instead of spending time in keeping those still compatible they are better off using the time to improve intel performance.

    The stock mini with 320M will run circles around the beefiest G5 ever made.
     
  4. Huntn macrumors G5

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #4
    Based on this link I am surprised. WoW up to Cataclysm runs well enough on my 1.8 G5. I'm surprised they are cutting off PPC people who want to play the game pre-Cataclysm. Of course maybe there are not many of them left?

    From Blizzard:

     
  5. thejadedmonkey macrumors 604

    thejadedmonkey

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Location:
    Pa
    #5
    I remember playing WoW off of my iPod, connected to my G4 mini with 256 megs of RAM.

    Get off my front lawn! Stupid kids and their shiny new toys :mad::D
     
  6. cluthz macrumors 68040

    cluthz

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2004
    Location:
    Norway
    #6
    WoW has changed a lot.

    I played WoW occasionally on my PowerMac G4 450 mhz with GeForce 4MX and 768MB RAM, it ran pretty well in Elwynn Forrest and the other early zones.

    I tried Wotlk on my iMac G5 half a year ago and it was horrible! With everything on lowest it couldn't keep 20 FPS outdoor in Northrend. Crossing from one bank to another in Dalaran took minutes, like watching a slideshow..

    I remember when I got the iMac how fast it ran WoW compared to the PowerMac G4...

    WoW '04 ain't the same as WoW '10.

    WoW '04 system reqs: 900 mhz G4 or higher, 512 MB RAM and 64MB graphics.
    Wotlk reqs: G5 or Intel CPU (this means 1.6GHz +), 1GB RAM, Radeon 9600 (stock G5s had nvidia 5200, which is slower than the 9600)
     
  7. rbarris macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2003
    Location:
    Irvine CA
    #7
    The tide started going out on PPC a long time ago, when Leopard 10.5.8 marked the last graphics driver update (and basically the last set of non security bugfixes AFAICT). Since WoW is an evolving product, as its feature set changes it could be (is) very difficult to maintain testing / debugging / workaround efforts on a non-evolving platform. (Hand raised; been there done that)

    Thread is mis titled, it should read "WoW PPC support winding down completely" since it is not specific to people running the next expansion.
     
  8. Gasu E. macrumors 68040

    Gasu E.

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2004
    Location:
    Not far from Boston, MA.
    #8
    My old G5 with Radeon 9600 was really challenged with 25-man raiding and hot spots such as Daleran. It was barely playable, at some times completely unplayable (and I have pretty low standards-- I will play even at 10fps). Leveling and 5-man raids were okay, not great, at low settings. If the changes coming with Cataclysm raise the bar at all, it is really time to put G5 support to bed.
     
  9. hippo206 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    #9
    Im glad, for once blizzard isn't catering to the casual gamers every want. Its time for the game to be significantly updated, and I can only imagine how difficult it would be to support current machines AND 6-7 year old machines.
     
  10. Peace macrumors Core

    Peace

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Location:
    Space--The ONLY Frontier
  11. rasmasyean macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    #11
    Good. I'm glad Blizzard is stepping up to not waste resources on such legacy equipment. It should step up the possibilities also without having to make everything compatible with ppl who insist on keeping their old computers...and although it may sound harsh, but also laggards who are poor or simply cheap. The world has to move on and slow pokes are better left behind than stunting the group migration.
     
  12. Huntn macrumors G5

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #12
    I have an intel Mac if I wanted to play WoW, but still an eye opener.
     
  13. CJM macrumors 65816

    CJM

    Joined:
    May 7, 2005
    Location:
    U.K.
    #13
    This. And good metaphor too. Anyone still using an old PPC should upgrade, they must be unbearably slow anyway.
     
  14. hippo206 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    #14
    If you get into computer gaming you should understand that it will require constant upgrading of components (or in Apple's case usually entire systems) in order to stay up to par. For those not willing to do so should look into console gaming. It has always been this way, and I don't see it changing anytime soon.

    Blizzard is notorious for trying to cater to such a wide group. I really think it hindered SC... if you go to forums you will see all of the issues they are having.
     
  15. rasmasyean macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    #15
    Electronics in general are not really "durable goods". They are more like "perishables". They are only good for so long. The problem is that some people don't think of it this way because it's a physical object that doesn't nomally degrade. And it will still "work" by some basic definition of the word for a long time.

    I always thought of buying a computer is really "renting" a computer. And the more you pay for it up front, the longer you can use it for. After a while, it's really just garbage...or in some cases you can give it to grandma to look at pictures or something.

    And unless it's a corner email machine for "convenience", you're much better off buying a new one if you want to get even a small part of what the computing industry offers.
     
  16. lannister80 macrumors 6502

    lannister80

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2009
    Location:
    Chicagoland
    #16
    Well, you can re-purpose old computers to do all kinds of things. Torrent slave, NAS box/media tank, firewall, switch, wifi repeater, webcam brain (no need for IP-based cams).
     
  17. QuantumLo0p macrumors 6502a

    QuantumLo0p

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Location:
    U.S.A.
    #17
    It had to happen sooner or later and Power is a dead platform for personal computing despite being a powerhouse in high end stuff. I'm glad I just bought my Mini.

    I have to say though, in contrary to what I've heard from some fellow MR posters, my experience has shown the new Mini to be marginally faster than my hopped-up old PowerMac. The Mini's lack of ample ram and especially the hdd where my old raid 0 setup punks the Mini are a couple areas where Apple should really have equipped the Mini a bit better. Instead they leave it up to the consumer to add more ram and swap out the steaming turd hdd to make it usable.

    Don't get me wrong, I love my Mini and feel I made a good choice. The design is way cool and it looks great on my desk. It is a good successor to my old PowerMac.
    :)
     
  18. rasmasyean macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    #18
    That's kind of escapes the concept of a personal computer. That's more like an application specific computer-based device. Most of these cases you can actually buy a much lower power and smaller product that can do the same thing. And usually better, without the need to "go geek" on a project that often is not even worth the time for most people, even those who are professional IT ppl.
     
  19. kellen macrumors 68020

    kellen

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2006
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    #19
    Too bad, but they have to move forward.

    I just renewed my account, haven't played for 2 years.
     
  20. Huntn macrumors G5

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #20
    ...and the Xbox360. :)
     
  21. rasmasyean macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2008
    #21
    Where'd you get that info from? The last time I heard, the Xbox 360 is the leading platform in terms of game sales per unit. And they are sceduled to have a newer smaller version comming out for the holidays and a new motion capture attachment with new games where you use your body to control it.
     
  22. cluthz macrumors 68040

    cluthz

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2004
    Location:
    Norway
    #22
    He's not meaning the xbox is dying, but that the xbox is based on the Power platform.
    The xbox uses an IBM 3.2GHz 3-core PowerPC CPU
     
  23. Huntn macrumors G5

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #23
    It was supposed to read like this: "despite being a powerhouse in high end stuff...and the Xbox 360." :)
     
  24. hippo206 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2007
    #24
    I agree with Ras. You CAN re-purpose a old box, but you are often sacrificing reliabiltiy, size and function. The NAS box is the perfect example of that.
     
  25. cluthz macrumors 68040

    cluthz

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2004
    Location:
    Norway
    #25
    :)
    My Dell Optiplex Sx280 (USFF, ultra small form factor) is a good example, it's small, use no power at all and it does have space for a SATA drive, so I popped in a 1.5TB disk and had a nice storage server. It's inside my closet with no screen or keyboard and I just mount it thru my network :D
     

Share This Page