mdriftmeyer said:That is a really paranoid question. There won't be any split between Universals. You don't piss of millions of PowerPC users who have deployed systems and go, "Get a new intel one and shut up already!"
w_parietti22 said:August???? Isn't that later than normal???![]()
So this is how Apple will deal with Intel being in the driver's seat - shuffling dates so that Apple events "just happen" to coincide with Intel events.~Shard~ said:Yep - the latest it's ever been, I believe. I remember WWDCs of the past and the past 3 have been in May, late June and early June. It's almost as if Apple is delaying it on purpose to coordinate it with the release of a new Intel-based product or something... weird, huh?![]()
![]()
AidenShaw said:So this is how Apple will deal with Intel being in the driver's seat - shuffling dates so that Apple events "just happen" to coincide with Intel events.
LOL...
lvnmacs said:.....if you have to be developer to attend WWDC? Can students attend? Are the price of admission that much if you can attend as a student?
Thanks
macdong said:don't know which planet you are coming from
i think the PowerMac looks very nice no matter where you put it.
but a redesign case would be nice.
perhaps with a glassy look-through surface?![]()
MacsRgr8 said:Maybe some SSE3 acceleration / features that will not work on PPC with AltiVec? Nah, don't think so.
The fact that 10.4 still runs on a G3 (with FireWire), makes me very confident that upcoming releases of Mac OS X 10.x will keep supporting PPC. Presumably PPC with AltiVec and Quartz Extreme will be required.
I can't imagine any G5 being left out in any of the features in Leopard.
Mind you, it will be the first universal binary release of the Retail Mac OS X 10.5.
I wonder how many maxxxxxxuussssss-cracked PC's out there will be running this.
XIII said:What does this do to the date of Mac Expo Paris....
runninmac said:I wonder if one of the reasons its so late this year so MS wont be able to steal any features of Leopard.
PS: if anyone wants to digg the story feel free to
AidenShaw said:Apple will announce that Leopard will be available in a true 64-bit version, but only for Intel processors. For PPC systems 64-bit will remain as it is - no graphics, no cocoa, no....
BWhaler said:I think this is spot on.
Leopard needs to be a major jump over 10.4 since Vista is basically a dead knock-off of OS X.
Damek said:23-inch iMac, here we come!
~Shard~ said:There are quite a few things we'll see from Apple before we see that one.![]()
![]()
Damek said:Well, I'll also accept "Mac mini with a better graphics chip" - I can always buy the screen separately...
But I'd much prefer the all-in-one solution, with big hard drive built-in, etc. It's OK, though, I'm not really looking to buy any new computer tech before 2008! My iBook G4 1GHz and Mini-ITX 1GHz server are doing OK until then, I think!...I'll be very angry and disappointed if there's no 23" iMac by then! >> grrr! <<
AidenShaw said:So this is how Apple will deal with Intel being in the driver's seat - shuffling dates so that Apple events "just happen" to coincide with Intel events.
LOL...
XIII said:What does this do to the date of Mac Expo Paris....