You've also forgot the increased revenue Apple will gain from licence fees on Lightning headphones and adaptors.That's the story line, but there are other factors: cut component count, increase available interior space for functions like battery or stereo speaker, make a single connector serve for all I/O...
That's simply not true. One doesn't change phone simply choosing the best for him, especially if you invested several hundreds dollars in apps and services over the time...no, it doesnt force me to do anything, but it makes me not buying... i can live with my current phone, no need to replace it soon and when the time is there, i always choose the phone what is best for me - not the brand, os, name or shiny blingbling...
Wow 4 years ! I'm impressed. I tried everything, every brand, even the expensive Bose, but every sport headset last me no more than 12-15 months (I run 3-4 times a week).This isn't a plug for a product sale, as I have no affiliation, but I used a products by a company called yurbuds. I've had the headphones for four years, I run St least four times a week but up to 12 depending on what my goals are, and have run them through the washer three times and the dryer once. The pause/play button noon get works but everything else functions just fine. Not super hi fidelity sound, but definitely sufficient for a run.
The product is so good that it is the reason I'm depressed for this move. I haven't found a good pair of . Bluetooth running buds and I have little faith in the longevity of an adapter.
Are you sure license fee are requested for future lightning headphones?You've also forgot the increased revenue Apple will gain from licence fees on Lightning headphones and adaptors.
That's simply not true. One doesn't change phone simply choosing the best for him, especially if you invested several hundreds dollars in apps and services over the time...
Manufacturers have to sign up to the MFi program to use the Lightning connector and pay a fee on each item sold. It was $4 per device ($8 if using pass-through) though it may be cheaper now.Are you sure license fee are requested for future lightning headphones?
I use headphones at work(when possible) and BT headphones when I exercise or run.Manufacturers have to sign up to the MFi program to use the Lightning connector and pay a fee on each item sold. It was $4 per device ($8 if using pass-through) though it may be cheaper now.
This is why I'm against replacing the industry standard 3.5mm port with a proprietary socket which is likely to only appear on Apple devices. If Apple decided to make the socket and connector a new open standard which any company can use at no cost then my opposition will disappear but we all know this is unlikely to happen.
Manufacturers have to sign up to the MFi program to use the Lightning connector and pay a fee on each item sold. It was $4 per device ($8 if using pass-through) though it may be cheaper now.
This is why I'm against replacing the industry standard 3.5mm port with a proprietary socket which is likely to only appear on Apple devices. If Apple decided to make the socket and connector a new open standard which any company can use at no cost then my opposition will disappear but we all know this is unlikely to happen.
oh ok. doesn't sound like you are a typical user then. i don't think the majority of iPhone users are gonna mind not having the 3.5mm jack. i would bet the majority of people only use headphones with the one device and i doubt it's going to be an issue for them having an adaptor attached to the end of their headphone cord. so, i don't believe apple is losing a whole lot of sleep knowing a small percentage of you are getting all worked up about this change.iPads, macs, PCs, receivers, mixing consoles, in ear monitors, and probably some other occasional gadgets. I have different headphones that I select from depending on where I'm at, what I've packed, and what I'm doing. Similarly, I also use my iPhone as a source for things like mixing consoles, powered speakers, and other audio gear. There are some deficiencies to the phone jack design (audio quality not being one of them), but it is an industry standard.
There are workarounds for a missing 3.5mm jack, sure. I could buy more headphones for just my iPhone. I could get an adapter to keep in my bag (and a spare or two for when it gets lost), or just use another device as my audio source rather than grabbing what's always on my belt. But figuring out workarounds for the loss of key functionality on a $1000 device is not what makes me a happy customer.
Losing the headphone jack in itself won't necessarily cause me to leave the iPhone. However, if doing so results in making the iPhone any THINNER, that might well be a cause of me to do so.
Right now, I'm completely fine and satisfied with my iPhone 6S, but I really don't want or see a reason why the phone has to be any thinner. Honestly, I have not even used the headphone jack since I got my 6S back in September. I have bluetooth all around - earbuds, speaker, and in my jeep - and I don't know if I will ever have a need for the headphone jack.
I actually didn't even use the headphone jack very much on my 5S for the 2 years I had it. I hated the fact that Apple moved the headphone jack to the bottom of the device starting with the iPhone 5. It felt too impractical for my tastes at that point.
So no, removing the headphone jack in itself won't cause me to leave, but making the phone any thinner that the current 6/6S lineup just might.
It doesn't bother me. I'm sure Apple will supply some Bluetooth headphones in the box. You can always get a Bluetooth adapter and use your old headphones. Also I will still have other devices such as my iPads and Mac that I can use my older headphones with. I already have some Bluetooth headphones anyway.
The only potential issue I can see is the Bluetooth draining the battery but Apple will have factored this is and I'm sure in the end it won't be an issue.
Really no need for such a condescending post, which I'm sure violates MR terms of debate. The last sentence doesn't make it any less condescending.Your blind trust in Apple to take care of everything is cute....almost like a small child would have for a parent. I enjoyed reading your post.
Nope I COULD'NT care less either way, I still like my iPhone over Android, and I use my phone for more stuff but only listed to music via Bluetooth. If they got rid of the ability to use bluetooth for music, that would be a difference story but I highly doubt that would ever happen, since Apple's thing is going Wireless
This is my first iPhone but the Bluetooth range and stability blows away all my prior Androids including the Note series.I have tried more than a few BT headsets and have yet to find one that has the same quality as my wired set.
Biggest issue though for normal use is the BT in the iPhone itself. My 6S+ does not have the greatest range and frequently has an issue linking to some items. An issue I do not have with my Note 5.
If they drop the headphone jack, I'll keep my 6S+ but migrate away from the iPhone for good.
Note: my 6S+ is a BYOD subsidized work device. However work now supports Android so I have options.