Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You young folks (like I'm guessing the OP is) need to read, think about, and internalize something called Ockham's Razor.
 
Keep Reaching, The stars are close :rolleyes:


Apple did not plan this, they did not give a prototype iPhone to the media to throw us off.

People need to face it that this go around Apples security and secrecy was compromised. The leaked phone is what we will see in 11 days.

Agreed ... even a fake leak hurts Apple because people stop buying the current model. They would be stupid to do that.
 
They were prototypes. Nothing more, and whatever ends up at retail will prove or disprove nothing.

Do some research before posting; each of these phones had a designation on them:

Actually, we've seen (in order of design process):

PRO2 - Vietnam phone w/o screws
EVT - Twitpic phone w/o screws
DVT - Gizmodo phone w/ screws

The only prototype was the Vietnamese phone. The Gizmodo phone (DVT) is the last stage before production. NOT A PROTOTYPE

Also, NOT LEAKED FAKES
 
No it's not.

If they left it there with the INTENTION of someone taking it (which, in your scenario, would be very easy to prove) then it's not stolen. Gizmodo's lawyers would have no trouble making that case.

(If I hand you the keys to my car in public and walk away, then it'd be really hard for me to then come back and claim you stole my car.)

So then Apple would get in very, very serious trouble for filing a false police report as part of a publicity stunt.

There's no way that "get in trouble with the law just to shock some internet nerds" is a plan Apple is going to be pulling off.

EDIT: And I see you already AGREE that it's not theft:



So you're actually arguing against yourself at this point. If it is "just leaving something lying around" then Apple filed a false police report already.

Wrong. Apparently you haven't heard of bait cars. Which the Supreme Court has ruled perfectly legal.
 
Conspiracy theories are fun... however I have also agree with the OP..to an extent. It is not that too far fetched a concept to say that this whole thing was indeed staged by Apple to help ramp up hype and publicitly for the iPhone a thousand fold... however... as far as I am aware the Police and the Feds were involved.

If the leak was part of an Apple conspiracy, then it risks totally out weighed the benefits. If found out, they would lose all credibility. Then again...maybe the police are being controlled by Apple...

Hmm...would make an awesome movie.
 
If I was an Apple shareholder, I'd be more than happy for Jobs to invest in things like this if he thought it would yield a significant return.

Explain to me how doing what you're describing would yield ANY return, let alone 'significant'. The sales of the next iPhone are already X. You'd have to somehow make them Y. The only way that could happen is if the 'other' phone is so incredible that the entire planet poops their pants looking at it.


Conspiracy theories are fun... however I have also agree with the OP..to an extent. It is not that too far fetched a concept to say that this whole thing was indeed staged by Apple to help ramp up hype and publicitly for the iPhone a thousand fold... however... as far as I am aware the Police and the Feds were involved.

If the leak was part of an Apple conspiracy, then it risks totally out weighed the benefits. If found out, they would lose all credibility. Then again...maybe the police are being controlled by Apple...

Hmm...would make an awesome movie.

What you're describing is plausible. That the phones were purposely leaked to drum up interest. That is an easy thing to do, and doesn't cost them much. What he is describing is completely different. That they designed and built a phone that they have no plans of using and then leaked it just so Jobs could go 'ha! we fooled you!!!'. That is not possible.
 
I've been told by a consultant that works with Apple that it is not uncommon for jobs to have them bring two competing products right up to the pre-production stage before deciding which of the two will go into production. So while it may not be true that Apple intentionally leaked what we have seen, it may not be the phone that goes into production.

I have no idea whether this is true, but I wouldn't put it past Apple to spend that kind of money on what basically is R&D.
 
Wrong. Apparently you haven't heard of bait cars. Which the Supreme Court has ruled perfectly legal.

WRONG. COMPLETELY different situation. One is an individual attempting to commit fraud an another is government protection agency attempting to catch criminals.

I haven't seen an individual that falsely reported the theft of their vehicle get off because the Supreme Court deemed it legal. :rolleyes:
 
I've been told by a consultant that works with Apple that it is not uncommon for jobs to have them bring two competing products right up to the pre-production stage before deciding which of the two will go into production. So while it may not be true that Apple intentionally leaked what we have seen, it may not be the phone that goes into production.

I have no idea whether this is true, but I wouldn't put it past Apple to spend that kind of money on what basically is R&D.

I would agree, except that most of the recent leaks appear to be spare parts off a production line, not fully assembled prototypes.
 
Well, real leaks or not, all I care about is that we'll still see a bigger battery, LED camera flash, 5 megapixels and the A4 processor. I couldn't care less if it'll look like the fugly droids lol.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.