I'm not letting Apple off the hook. They have a role in this too, but ultimately the user has a choice to make and to make that choice on facts or marketing hype or a combination of both. IMO, facts speak more loudly and impact me more when I make a decision. Others mileage and reasons will vary.
Fact: I have never directly used the Map app in the past.
Fact: I live in a reasonably well populated area in NY state.
Fact: My condo community is roughly 30 years old.
Fact: Every navigation or mapping software I have ever used (including Tom Tom) either knows my address or, at worst (as was the case with Google), had each of the numbers off by one.
Based on the above facts, yes, I made a decision to upgrade.
Fact: Apple's Maps place my and the majority of my neighbors in the middle of a wooded area a few hundred feet away from anything.
Fact: Location based reminders are now impossible for me.
Fact: Real Estate apps (such as Zillow) are now useless in my area.
Fact: All of my fitness apps are severely compromised with missing addresses, no walking/ bike paths and out of date satellite imagery.
I suppose this is all my fault though. After all, I was the one to assume that they would, at the very least, be able to find my address and general surrounding area...especially since Tom Tom never had a problem doing so.
I don't care that it's missing the vast majority of POI in my town or that the few it does have are grossly mislabeled. With a version 1, things like that are expected.
What I don't get is how it's somehow my fault for thinking they'd be able to get the basic maps correct... as every other mapmaker has been able to.