WSJ: Apple Apps Unfairly Dominate App Store Search Results

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Apr 12, 2001
7,187
8,363
0
19
www.macrumors.com



Apple's mobile apps are often first in App Store search results ahead of competitors, according to a new analysis done by The Wall Street Journal.

For basic searches like "maps," Apple's apps ranked first more than 60 percent of the time in the WSJ's testing. Apps that generate revenue like Music or Books showed up first in 95 percent of related searches.


Apple, in response to questioning from the Wall Street Journal, did its own testing and said that it had different results where its apps didn't rank first.

Apple says that it uses an algorithm that uses machine learning and past consumer preferences, leading to app rankings that often fluctuate. Apple suggested that its apps ranked first in the WSJ's testing because those apps are popular with consumers. Apple says that all apps are subjected to the same search algorithm, including its own.
"Apple customers have a very strong connection to our products and many of them use search as a way to find and open their apps," Apple said in a statement. "This customer usage is the reason Apple has strong rankings in search, and it's the same reason Uber, Microsoft and so many others often have high rankings as well."
Many of the Apple apps in the App Store are installed by default on iPhones and iPads, though they can now be deleted if desired. Having them available in the App Store lets customers who have deleted them restore them when needed.

In one example, the WSJ highlights the audiobooks search category. The top spot was held by AudioBooks.com for two years before it was unseated by the Apple Books app last September, which led to a 25 percent decline in AudioBooks.com's daily app downloads. Apple Books ranks first for audiobooks, books, and reader searches, leading the audiobooks category because of "user behavior data" and the "audiobooks" keyword, says Apple.

Similarly, Apple Maps ranks first in a search for "maps," while the TV app and the iTunes Store come up first in searches for keywords like "tv," "movies," and "videos."

The Wall Street Journal suggests that Apple's App Store dominance gives Apple an upper hand, especially as many default apps are not held to the same standards that third party apps are required to adhere to. Many Apple apps, for example, do not feature reviews or ratings, which is one of the factors that influence search results along with downloads.

There are a total of 42 factors used to determine where apps rank in search, but the factors with the most influence are downloads, ratings, relevance, and user behavior. User behavior includes the number of times that users select an app after a search and then go on to download it, according to Apple.

Apple is facing legal battles over its App Store policies. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in May that a lawsuit accusing Apple of anticompetitive behavior for requiring apps to be sold through the App Store could continue, and the European Commission has asked Apple for answers after Spotify accused it of anticompetitive App Store business practices related to the fee that Apple collects from app developers.

The Wall Street Journal's full report on Apple's App Store search rankings can be read over on the WSJ website.

Article Link: WSJ: Apple Apps Unfairly Dominate App Store Search Results
 

Quu

macrumors 68030
Apr 2, 2007
2,657
4,174
0
Yet another WSJ hit piece on Apple. Jeff Bezos must still be pissed his phone did worse against the iPhone than Microsofts Zune did against the iPod.

EDIT: I got The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post mixed up. My bad!
 
Last edited:

az431

macrumors 65816
Sep 13, 2008
1,258
3,383
0
Portland, OR
Whoop dee doo. The shocking part is that some people expect Apple to not place its own apps front and center in its own App Store. Or that an app called "Maps" would not be first when people search for "maps." Shocking!

WSJ doesn't seem to have an issue with their locked articles being placed front and center in Apple News to get people to sign up for Apple News+

Thanks for the click bait WSJ.
 

Crowbot

macrumors 6502
May 29, 2018
403
762
0
NYC
And how critical is it to be the first listing? I certainly don't stop after the first citation in a web search.
[doublepost=1563904143][/doublepost]
Yet another WSJ hit piece on Apple. Jeff Bezos must still be pissed his phone did worse against the iPhone than Microsofts Zune did against the iPod.
WSJ is owned by Rupert Murdoch. Bezos owns the Washington Post. So by stretching a bit it could be a hit piece on Apple from the right. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oberhorst

markosb

macrumors 6502
Mar 19, 2010
350
30
0
WSJ should do a write up on all other stores as well. Walmart puts their brand in favorable spots as well, as does Target and most Grocery stores. This isn’t news, it’s fact.
 

shplock

macrumors regular
Dec 25, 2015
232
208
0
Somewhere in a Galaxy far far away
I think that the WSJ no longe has any credibility and needs to shut the **** up. It is Apple's ecosystem. Apple are the ones who design the products, Apple are the ones who build the products(Foxconn etc actually build them but Apple are essentially in charge), Apple are the ones who advertise the products and sell them and Apple are the ones who run the App Store as well as collect revenues.
So the WSJ and Spotify want to essentially get a free ride. They wish to not contribute to Apple in any way and have Apple run their eco system in a way that best benefits them.


 

69Mustang

macrumors 604
Jan 7, 2014
6,889
12,352
0
In between a rock and a hard place
In other news, Pepsi vending machines must now feature Coke products, because ..... fairness
How are you people coming...

Now Ford dealers must sell Chevrolet cars as well.
up with the same terribly themed analogies?


What the WSJ is claiming, from an analogy standpoint, is this:
Apple is a flea market that charges it's tenants yearly rent for their booth and takes a cut of each of the tenants sales. But to get to the tenants booth, you have to run the gauntlet of Apple booths before getting to the tenant.

They are claiming Apple is the landlord, business partner, and -here's the crux- competitor that puts it's wares up front.
 



Apple's mobile apps are often first in App Store search results ahead of competitors, according to a new analysis done by The Wall Street Journal.

For basic searches like "maps," Apple's apps ranked first more than 60 percent of the time in the WSJ's testing. Apps that generate revenue like Music or Books showed up first in 95 percent of related searches.


Apple, in response to questioning from the Wall Street Journal, did its own testing and said that it had different results where its apps didn't rank first.

Apple says that it uses an algorithm that uses machine learning and past consumer preferences, leading to app rankings that often fluctuate. Apple suggested that its apps ranked first in the WSJ's testing because those apps are popular with consumers. Apple says that all apps are subjected to the same search algorithm, including its own.Many of the Apple apps in the App Store are installed by default on iPhones and iPads, though they can now be deleted if desired. Having them available in the App Store lets customers who have deleted them restore them when needed.

In one example, the WSJ highlights the audiobooks search category. The top spot was held by AudioBooks.com for two years before it was unseated by the Apple Books app last September, which led to a 25 percent decline in AudioBooks.com's daily app downloads. Apple Books ranks first for audiobooks, books, and reader searches, leading the audiobooks category because of "user behavior data" and the "audiobooks" keyword, says Apple.

Similarly, Apple Maps ranks first in a search for "maps," while the TV app and the iTunes Store come up first in searches for keywords like "tv," "movies," and "videos."

The Wall Street Journal suggests that Apple's App Store dominance gives Apple an upper hand, especially as many default apps are not held to the same standards that third party apps are required to adhere to. Many Apple apps, for example, do not feature reviews or ratings, which is one of the factors that influence search results along with downloads.

There are a total of 42 factors used to determine where apps rank in search, but the factors with the most influence are downloads, ratings, relevance, and user behavior. User behavior includes the number of times that users select an app after a search and then go on to download it, according to Apple.

Apple is facing legal battles over its App Store policies. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in May that a lawsuit accusing Apple of anticompetitive behavior for requiring apps to be sold through the App Store could continue, and the European Commission has asked Apple for answers after Spotify accused it of anticompetitive App Store business practices related to the fee that Apple collects from app developers.

The Wall Street Journal's full report on Apple's App Store search rankings can be read over on the WSJ website.

Article Link: WSJ: Apple Apps Unfairly Dominate App Store Search Results

When app developers can pick and choose where,when, how they can sell apps, then these cases go away. Vendors are locked into a singular place to market and are handcuffed by apples rules. The deniers will say apple owns the marketplace, too bad. OK, cool, you keep on doing that, but it then becomes litigation heaven if you do that.
 

Appleman3546

macrumors member
May 13, 2019
37
64
0
It isn’t monopolistic to (intentionally or unintentionally through the use of their own search algorithms) promote your own apps over competitors in search results or take an unreasonable high cut from those competitors...unless there are no other avenues for that competitor to avoid competitive interference such as by encouraging downloads from a website or rival App Store