Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Not sure who’s making things up but intel modems have been some of the best, if not the best, out there. First thing I did with my Lenovo Legion gaming laptop was swap to the intel modem. Better reception and speeds. Intel modems were the most common place in the industry.
Intel wireless, not cellular.
 
I mean, tech always starts out like that, and then they leap forward, I think Apple is capable of doing that.

I wonder what the cost benefits are to just buying a modem vs trying to build your own. I guess they did that with processors and it has worked out for them, but smaller components I wasn't so sure about. For example they aren't trying to make their own screens, so why so much focus on a modem?
 
Apple like to play dirty in the business world but they do not like it when the table are turned and it is them on the receiving end. Take the app store for example. Apple designed it, built it, own it and thus do as they wish with it. Anyone that want's to use the app store is basically told 'You do it our way, you do it how we tell you, when we tell you and price it how ever we want' and if you do not like those terms you are free to go elsewhere' and many agree with Apple on these, even the courts agree with Apple on this but when companies do the same to Apple, oh hell there be fireworks. Apple like to treat others like dirt but when the tables are turned on them it's a whole different story.

Apple wanted to move away from PPC chips and the best around at the time was Intel (they was far superior to AMD at the time). Intel, within reason could demand what they wanted because otherwise Apple would have no CPU chip. I have no doubt the continued arrangement with Intel to use their CPU's annoyed Apple very much because Apple could not hold all the cards to get what they wanted. Intel could have pulled out at any time and Apple would have been in serious trouble, no CPU, no computers and they would not have time to use a rival CPU maker. Apple finally got away from Intel's clutches by making their own CPU and of course what do we see, Apple royally dumping Intel's ass. Qualcomm are in the same position as Intel were, they are in control because without Qualcomm modem chips, Apple devices are a poor version of themselves. So what is Apple trying to do, get rid of Qualcomm's control by developing their own modem chip.

Remember the TV series Dallas, Dynasty and Falcon Crest? All about one family wanting control and domination the business they were in and destroying anyone and everyone that got in their way. Well that is Apple, they want to be in control and dominate over others. They design and build their own computers and mobile phones and thus they do not want to have to rely on others for major parts of their machines in this case the CPU's and modems. One of those hurdles is gone, Intel because now Apple make their own CPU. Now they need to remove the other hurdle, the communication chip which would stop Apple's reliance on Qualcomm. Qualcomm can set it's own terms and conditions and prices of it's modems and if Apple don't like it Qualcomm can quite happily walk away. You see, Qualcomm is in control, not Apple and Apple wont like this, hence their long continued effort into developing their own modem chip.

Remember, with the app store Apple can say 'it's our way or the highway', Intel used to be able to say this but not anymore due to Apple making it's own CPU. Qualcomm still have the power to say to Apple 'it's our way or the highway' and Apple do not like this. As i said, Apple is happy to do it to others but do not like it when it is done to them.

The problem with Intel was, if I remember correctly, that Apple was “locked” into their release schedule, which is clearly not the case with Qualcomm, as Apple do not even use their latest modems as yet and not many Apple customers complain, as it is still an improvement over older stuff.
 
comparing prototypes with full blown final stage Chip
This is WSJ that cannot understand tech
I never expect him to understand technology. They only know the business aspects they do hire people to consult in technology. They have no idea what They are doing when you’re writing articles. They get referrals and public relations but that’s about it. So you’re right
 
  • Like
Reactions: MRMSFC
"The chips were essentially three years behind Qualcomm’s best modem chip."

Wow, basically means Apple's chip performed like X50, Qualcomm's first 5G modem. Sounds like Apple really thoroughly inherited Intel's team.
The problem is u still need to license the patents from qualcomm but the advantage is when 6g comes out u will have ur own patents. intel is the most horrible company more like slave labor ( i used to design chips) qualcomm is very innovative.
 
There’s a business angle to this that seems to be missed by most reporting on this.

Apple doesn’t necessarily need to succeed in building their own modem. As long as this project continues, as something possible on the horizon, it gives them leverage in their modem purchase negotiations with Qualcomm.

Without this project, Apple will be completely beholden to Qualcomm as a modem supplier and Qualcomm will be able to ask for anything on their modem deals. The threat of switching completely to in-house modems, even ones that doesn’t perform as well as Qualcomms, is enough to keep Qualcomm at bay. Apple’s modem orders make up for 20% of Qualcomm’s revenue.


edit: Samsung does the exact same thing, but with a working modem. They still use Qualcomm in their top of line phones but the rest of the line up has some models with their own Samsung modems. So if Apple make a modem good enough for an iPhone SE, it’s enough to give them the upper hand to keep using Qualcomm modems on the Pro phones.
 
Last edited:
Extremely embarrassing for Apple, but after all innovation is scarse these days at the company so it’s nothing to be surprised about.
So you've completely forgotten about the Vision Pro announcement a few months back that completely floored the entire AR/VR industry?

What’s everyone doing with these modems? I can’t think of anything I’m doing today which is different to 3 years ago, 5G included.
Cellular standards change. They change both over time and by region/country. As cellular data rates increase so have the frequencies in play and dealing with copper shift of moving devices, reflection, multi-path, and a whole pile of other signal propagation issues is a significant challenge. Think about trying to listen to a single conversation in a full sports stadium when you're 100ft away from the person you're speaking to; that's what cellular modems do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWallace and I7guy
So....basically, Apple hubris biting them in the a**? Say it ain't so!! Tech companies, they have gotten so big, that sometimes, they need a reality check, and boy oh boy, did Apple get one with this!
 
"Just because Apple builds the best silicon on the planet, it's ridiculous to think that they could also build a modem," said former Apple wireless director Jaydeep Ranade, who left the company in 2018, the year the project began.

If Apple is depicted as a dumb-dumb dummy that failed to anticipate the obstacles of a field that is foreign to them…

…then why even Qualcomm in 2021 was dead sure Apple’s modem would be ready by now? Are they too not familiar with the obstacles of the trade they’re in? Didn’t they know how “ridiculous” it sounds to imagine Apple making 5G modems? Were Qualcomm dumb-dumb dummies too in 2021?

“At an investor conference in New York, Qualcomm executives said they expect to supply only 20% of Apple’s modem chips by the launch of the iPhone in 2023. Qualcomm Chief Financial Officer Akash Palkhiwala expects Apple to make up a “low single-digit” percentage of the company’s chip sales by the end of fiscal 2024”
 
Last edited:
Extremely embarrassing for Apple, but after all innovation is scarse these days at the company so it’s nothing to be surprised about.
The problem I think is having to design around the patents. It's not that Apple can't build a better modem; it's that they can't do it using any methods that have been patented. That's a tough nut to crack when Qualcomm has so many patents in this area. Ideally they'd need to buy the company to do what they want, but that's probably not worth it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: huge_apple_fangirl
Apple consists of control freaks. They want to do everything on their own and they think they can do everything better. Apple buildings chips is like Tesla trying to build cars. They might work, but they will never be a Porsche.

I hear you bro. Apple A and M series cpu/gpu SOCs used in iPhones/tablets and computers, and their year-over-year improvements have definitely been flops.

Should Apple be going back to Intel CPUs?
 
Apple consists of control freaks. They want to do everything on their own and they think they can do everything better. Apple buildings chips is like Tesla trying to build cars. They might work, but they will never be a Porsche.
Look towards the future as that's where we will be living in.
 
There is absolutely no way any of this report is correct. Listen to the wisdom of Macrumours comments! Apple can move Mountains. They design the best CPU in the world. Apple Modem will come and trash Qualcomm in 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023..... /S

It is just great that comments aren't deleted in all the older threads.

How many times have I said designing a modern Qualcomm Modem competitor is harder than having a better CPU than Intel or AMD.
 
I hear you bro. Apple A and M series cpu/gpu SOCs used in iPhones/tablets and computers, and their year-over-year improvements have definitely been flops.

Should Apple be going back to Intel CPUs?
Yes, I would prefer Intel chips. It is sad that Apple took away that options. Apple silicon is optimized for special tasks like video editing, but I hardly ever edit a video.
 
To all the people bitching about the engineers in this thread:

The article pretty directly says it was a planning error with unrealistic goals and miscommunication between project management.

Even the best engineers can’t work around bad management.
 
Extremely embarrassing for Apple, but after all innovation is scarse these days at the company so it’s nothing to be surprised about.
Why is it embarrassing for a company to not yet be successful in doing something? Even if Apple never gets this figured out as well as Qualcomm, why be embarrassed at that? They can keep partnering with Qualcomm.
 
Yes, I would prefer Intel chips. It is sad that Apple took away that options. Apple silicon is optimized for special tasks like video editing, but I hardly ever edit a video.
you are aware all processors have circuitry designed for specific tasks, right?

And no thanks on the Intel chips. I’d rather not have a loud noisy turd on my desk.
 
Yes, I would prefer Intel chips. It is sad that Apple took away that options. Apple silicon is optimized for special tasks like video editing, but I hardly ever edit a video.

Well... the good news is that Intel is still in business and many companies make computers using Intel cpus, should you need a break from Apple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MRMSFC
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.