I think it has more to do with the implementation and an apparent failure to build out the ecosystem to encourage mass adoption of the platform amongst developers.It is the concept. That is the problem and that is the reason this device cannot be "fixed" in any way...
Probably this and I think thermals is an issue too. The VP has fans and fans don’t do well in pockets.Latency, probably. Electricity is fast but the travel time between chips still adds up. This is why Apple puts RAM directly adjacent to their chips.
It's the classic chicken or the egg question, the user base isn't where it needs to be to attract content makers and app developers to invest in it - and Apple clearly isn't doing enough. An immersive movie or two here, an ad and some PR there isn't enough to convince anyone this is a viable ecosystem.Huh? They are still releasing content for it. In fact, they have even released its first feature-length immersive film, designed specifically for the AVP, which is set to hit theaters on May 30th. So, yes, they are still investing in it. Additionally, the Blackmagic URSA Cine Immersive cameras, which were on pre-order since December, will soon be available for shipping. This means that anyone interested in creating AVP content will have the opportunity to do so. It appears that Apple has been laying the groundwork for widespread adoption of this technology in a couple of years.
The web browser was compelling, but it was also frustrating, as Apple decided not to support Adobe Flash, and that was a popular add on required by many websites at the time. It could be argued that Apple effectively killed Flash, or at least hastened its demise, and it could be argued that it was a good thing. But the first gen iPhone had some baffling omissions. I wouldn't call mobile Safari a killer app, because we HAD much better browsers that ran on desktops and laptops.The web browser. It could view full sites with relative ease, instead of the neutered WAP sites on other phones.
I am not sure about the comment regarding development focus. Was it not the case that the company focused its effort on AI, thinking it was going to be a game changer, rather than specifically focusing on the iPhone?It needs to be about have the weight, half the bulk, and most importantly, half the price.
Put an M4 in there with at least 24GB of DRAM, start at 512GB of storage and most of all Apple has to lead by example and move all its apps to native VisionOS apps, not glorified iPad apps. Tim Cook’s singular drive to squeeze as much profit out of the iPhone turnip to the exclusion of everything else (Watch, AirPods especially) has taken a toll on the “innovation” that Apple employees can come up with if they are allowed to exercise their minds.
I disagree with that assertion.
[…]
Anthony Racaniello, a media studio operator from Philadelphia, attempted to use the headset in the workplace and during air travel but experienced both social alienation and practical challenges. During one nearly six-hour flight, he said a flight attendant ignored him during beverage service.
You’re right, a $3,500 product is for the mass market and is not a niche product.
It's the resources that were allowed to bloom on this project that have been repurposed to save the Siri improvement. Having all your eggs in one basket is always a bad strategy.The travesty is Tim Cook dedicating resources to his signature boondoggle while Apple software, Siri, and AI have been left painfully behind.
Your personal relationshipsThat is a huge understatement.
This seemed like Tim Cook rushed this to get in before he retires soon. It's a very odd offering from Apple: high-price but no killer app...
iPod replaced CD players.
The iPhone replaced cellphones.
Not sure what this disrupts exactly.
Not one regret. WSJ if full of sh*t!
The iPhone Killer app was Alarms and Timers. It was so good that they spun it off.What was the original iPhone killer app? I remember lots of complaints about the high price, lack of keyboard, no 3G, and lack of flash. Surely will never replace a BlackBerry or Windows Mobile device. I remember lots of regret posts after the $200 price drop.
The original iPod was $100 more than the original Xbox and they were released within a month of each other.
I predict the market for the AVP is going to get smaller and it really could just find a home in the videophile community for people who want to watch fully immersive 3D movies and content, but not much else.
No, people fall for Apple’s marketing and think they’ll get used to it with time or that the software ecosystem will improve substantially.This is more an article about people who impulsively bought it and then didn’t bother returning it when they realized it wasn’t quite for them.