yes, although it could also mean that they tried to kill #12 (= no kill)
Let's just hope that one of our losses was Baltar.
good point.
hopefully it was Starbuck in action.
yes, although it could also mean that they tried to kill #12 (= no kill)
Let's just hope that one of our losses was Baltar.
I am voting for Twietee tomorrow
good point.
hopefully it was Starbuck in action.
It's unfortunate that not even the Starbuck knows if they succeeded. We still have no good info.
Forgive my ignorance as I haven't played many WW games, but wouldn't Starbuck at minimum know some people that are not cylons? If she protects a cylon she dies. So whoever she has protected is not a cylon. Unless of course she was Comeagain? and he protected a cylon the first night.
Forgive my ignorance as I haven't played many WW games, but wouldn't Starbuck at minimum know some people that are not cylons? If she protects a cylon she dies. So whoever she has protected is not a cylon. Unless of course she was Comeagain? and he protected a cylon the first night.
It seems likely that the starbuck would protect himself/herself for that very reason.
good point as well! my head hurts..
True, but Starbuck cannot protect the same person two nights in a row. Protecting yourself the first night only buys you a guaranteed vote the next day, with no information. Not that it's really better the other way I don't think. Either night 1 or night 2 you have a random chance of death as Starbuck. Regardless, if Starbuck is still alive, she knows at least one person that is not a cylon.
on night one, the most logical starbuck move would be self-protection, i doubt it was comeagain.
on night 2, s/he could have taken an educated risk based on what transpired in the game. in that case whoever was protected is not a bad cylon. if she didn't protect anyone, or protected herself on night 2, than cylons found 12 and starbuck know that for sure.
protected herself on night 2, than cylons found 12 and starbuck know that for sure.
on night one, the most logical starbuck move would be self-protection, i doubt it was comeagain.
on night 2, s/he could have taken an educated risk based on what transpired in the game. in that case whoever was protected is not a bad cylon. if she didn't protect anyone, or protected herself on night 2, than cylons found 12 and starbuck know that for sure.
Starbuck doesn't know whether the cylons attacked him/her or found #12 if the starbuck did indeed protect him/herself. All we know is that the cylons don't have a choice to not kill.
Starbuck doesn't know whether the cylons attacked him/her or found #12 if the starbuck did indeed protect him/herself. All we know is that the cylons don't have a choice to not kill.
yep, you are right. only if she didn't protect anyone she would know for sure 12 was idemtified
Back to the basics, am I right in thinking that Koodauw is the only one acting suspicious (besides some awfully quiet ones) but is quite unlikely to be a baddie?
qhy is he suspicious?
Distracting without purpose? I'd like to vote for some rather silent companions, i.e. Pluto but I have no idea really.
Distracting without purpose? I'd like to vote for some rather silent companions, i.e. Pluto but I have no idea really.
edit: wait, since ravenvii is running the game, isn't QoS supposed to be a threat?!![]()
Bad guys usually aren't that vocal at the beginning of a game, Don't Panic and myself being exceptions based on history.
Well, that'll be a good reason to play it that way actually. I just don't see the benefit if he's one of the good guys, but maybe you can give me a hint since Koodauw won't. Rick played some time ago a similar game (I'm assuming here) with Moyank accusing her out of the blue every single time, may be a viable approach long term for one's own game, but it doesn't help a bit imho. But I'm still learning.
@QoS : occam's razor?![]()
No post-editing permitted during the game.*
*Exception: if you are maintaining a vote count, your post MAY be edited.