The oracle could have done it secretly, but I think we just don't have one.
I think the infection is secret.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
[WW] - Heroes - Game Over! Good Guys win!
- Thread starter chrmjenkins
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
The oracle could have done it secretly, but I think we just don't have one.
I think the infection is secret.
May be. Or Tomorrow got infected afterwards: see DPs last 'infamous heat-list' where only SD and Tomorrow appeared blue. Or he wasn't infected at all - not totally impossible either.
anyway, QoS and Moyank do have my benefit of the doubt at the moment and it was often a good idea in previous games to go after one of those super silent players from time to time which are really hard to come by with reasoning. that would be one of woodnufc and koodauw for me right now.
so there is 17 special things for us, that would suck if the one left out was the oracle?
over the weekend is tough for some, i know ive been out of town and just checking in early morning and late night.
DP is not a player I pay much attention to regarding his theories about anything regarding these games.
Yes, Tomorrow could have been clean when he substituted himself for Pluto and infected right after. Which makes it hard to look at the voting that round and get much info.
I'm going to go with Koodauw at this point.
I haven't posted any less in this game than I have in the past. I've explained my absence on Friday's vote -- I was in a committee meeting that ran far too long. [SS, I'm sure you experienced that phenomenon in academia]
As far as the weekend, I posted more than some others. I have no insights to add to the game as I was just as caught off guard as everyone else as to Tomorrow's switch to Pluto and Aggies killing of Tomorrow.
My apologies that you think that I'm super silent. I don't think it's a fair assessment.
While I do understand the demands work commitments (and it is no exaggeration to say that I am exceptionally busy at the moment and will be at least for a further week), I also think that if you sign up to this sort of game, a minimum commitment is sort of implied, sort of like an implied contract.
That minimum includes voting, and the fact that two individuals did not even bold a name over the past few days does bother me. (What bothers me even more is that their participation was so invisible I didn't even notice that they hadn't voted!)
It is not just 'real life', it is that my experience tells me that those who post little often tend to be among the baddies, (or the winners).
Now, admittedly, this is a very productive strategy, but I do think it detracts from the over all enjoyment of the game, and one of my personal grumbles with this game is that the prolific posters tend to be the ones who are a target early on, while the silent ones coast to victory.
In other words, if you sign up, at least try to participate ..
That minimum includes voting, and the fact that two individuals did not even bold a name over the past few days does bother me. (What bothers me even more is that their participation was so invisible I didn't even notice that they hadn't voted!)
It is not just 'real life', it is that my experience tells me that those who post little often tend to be among the baddies, (or the winners).
Now, admittedly, this is a very productive strategy, but I do think it detracts from the over all enjoyment of the game, and one of my personal grumbles with this game is that the prolific posters tend to be the ones who are a target early on, while the silent ones coast to victory.
In other words, if you sign up, at least try to participate ..
There are a little too many variables in this game for my taste or WW.
Maybe the gravedigger could be of some help at this point? The fact that the original Executioner didn't speak up (and DP being the Necromancer) leaves only the Scavenger as a likely possibility for Tomorrow to be one of the starting baddies.
If he wasn't infected though I somewhat question the whole bickering with aggie. When Koodauw and I were WW we always wanted to start calling us out openly, but I guess we weren't mean enough.
Koodauw it is then.
I think if someone knows they're not going to be available for a day, they should either note that here and possibly make some kind of vote beforehand or they should make sure it only happens once, if at all. I knew I wasn't going to be around the other day, and I made my vote based on my gut at the time. I was kind of worried how that might affect the next day, if I wasn't around to change the vote, if needed, but it's better than doing nothing, IMO.
I've been playing in WW games for years and this is the first time I've ever missed a vote. If I was a WW I'd not choose the silent strategy, because it is a cheap way to play. I simply missed the vote. If I must die for my mistake, I understand, but my absence was far from deliberate.
Again, I'm sorry that I missed the deadline, I really am.
Maybe you can make it up to the metropolis by providing a vote count?
Yeah I will, and I'll remove my vote for you if you provide the metropolis with another photo of an attractive brunette.
You're getting the benefit of the doubt from me, because like I said, as long as you "make sure it only happens once," I can believe the reasoning. It's really the ones that make it a habit that I think SS (and I) are talking about. More than once in a game is ridiculous.
And I completely agree with you both. I really have felt bad about missing the vote.
Here is my tally, someone can double check to see if I caught everything.
Koodauw - 4 - Southern Dad, ScepticalScribe (vote changed at #494), Moyank (vote changed at #505), Twietee (vote changed at #509)
Moyank - 2 - Koodauw, WoodNUFC
Sythas - 2 - Abijnk, TechGod
QoS - 2 - Rick Snagwell, Aggie (vote changed at #499)
Rick Snagwell - 1 - QoS
No Vote - Sythas (vote changed at #483)
Thank you.
I keep a running total, too, (although I rarely flag the actual post numbers of the vote changes). I did briefly look in on the late DPs tally sheet to check whether anyone had bothered to update it since Day 2, and found that they hadn't. Your list coincides with my (hand-written) one.
Moyank not my favorite choice, but I do want to offer an alternative.
My suspect are Abi and twietee, but not enough for me to try to bring them foward.
My suspect are Abi and twietee, but not enough for me to try to bring them foward.
With the ability to switch block or double votes lurking, you should be sure in your choice, especially in a close vote.
And you're definitely barking up the wrong tree with yours.
There are a little too many variables in this game for my taste or WW.
Maybe the gravedigger could be of some help at this point? The fact that the original Executioner didn't speak up (and DP being the Necromancer) leaves only the Scavenger as a likely possibility for Tomorrow to be one of the starting baddies.
If he wasn't infected though I somewhat question the whole bickering with aggie. When Koodauw and I were WW we always wanted to start calling us out openly, but I guess we weren't mean enough.
Koodauw it is then.
You clearly didnt learn anything I taught you.
As I said before, I am a villager with a not so awesome power, but Ill use now and publically since I have nothing to hide. If I die off its not the end of the world.
As the rioter I double my vote.
Someone else will have to save me.
didnt someone that was a ww miss a vote last game though?
and i think you guys going for koodauw are missing it, time for some women to be killed off! they are killing us!
----------
im going to try and save koodauw and change my vote vote to moyank
and i think you guys going for koodauw are missing it, time for some women to be killed off! they are killing us!
----------
im going to try and save koodauw and change my vote vote to moyank
Man... back to no vote
----------
Rioter - This player can double another's lynching vote. (Active, One-time use, Day-time, Dual-nature)
you need to someone else vote, not yours...
----------
Rioter - This player can double another's lynching vote. (Active, One-time use, Day-time, Dual-nature)
you need to someone else vote, not yours...
just double mine then koodauw.
those 3 ladies that piled up on koodauw need to do something.