Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
just double mine then koodauw.

those 3 ladies that piled up on koodauw need to do something.

Take their clothes off?

I only see two women voting for Koodauw.

----------

Man... back to no vote

----------

Rioter - This player can double another's lynching vote. (Active, One-time use, Day-time, Dual-nature)


you need to someone else vote, not yours...

How exactly does that work if the player chosen later changes their vote? In other words, is it always doubled?
 
Take their clothes off?

I only see two women voting for Koodauw.

----------



How exactly does that work if the player chosen later changes their vote? In other words, is it always doubled?

To offer a suggestion (to women) that they "Take their clothes off" even in supposed jest is not a remark I find particularly funny.

Re the votes for Koodauw, two are from males (twietee and Southern Dad) and the remaining two were posted by Moyank and myself.

Okay, Koodauw, your post ranks as a suicide vote. Self pitying nihilism at its best. I assume with such a vote that it ranks as a cry of innocence.

Firstly, why add to the tally for yourself? Secondly, why not add something constructive to the debate, you know, something along the lines of a suggestion, suspicion, thought, proof and so on.

While this game boasts many roles, (and little by way of knowledge) I suspect that some of us may have more than one power. Now might not be a bad time to share some small soupçon of that knowledge….

I am not sure that Moyank is guilty, even though her current tally suggests that she is next in the running to Koodauw, whereas I do have questions about a few others. For now, rick snagwell, although even then, I am not certain of his guilt...
 
Take their clothes off?

I only see two women voting for Koodauw.

----------



How exactly does that work if the player chosen later changes their vote? In other words, is it always doubled?

I think it's double for that day... if they change there vote the double is still effective.
 
I think it's double for that day... if they change there vote the double is still effective.

Ask the GG for guidance on this one….

And some slight pooling of information might not go amiss…

On that topic, self-pitying nihilistic votes for oneself, while often, doubtless, a rather desperate cry for help, are of absolutely no use whatsoever to the Heroes. You do know that, Koodauw, don't you?

The Heroes will lose another individual, along with a witlessly self-indulgent [ab]use of that individual's power…….
 
Koodauw - 3 - Southern Dad, Moyank, Twietee
Moyank - 3 - Koodauw, WoodNUFC, Rick Snagwell
Sythas - 2 - Abijnk, TechGod
QoS - 2 - Aggie
Rick Snagwell - 2 - QoS, ScepticalScribe

No Vote - Sythas

----------

Ask the GG for guidance on this one….

And some slight pooling of information might not go amiss…

On that topic, self-pitying nihilistic votes for oneself, while often, doubtless, a rather desperate cry for help, are of absolutely no use whatsoever to the Heroes. You do know that, Koodauw, don't you?

The Heroes will lose another individual, along with a witlessly self-indulgent [ab]use of that individual's power…….

I pull my info from the difference in the role :

Reverber - This player can double his or her own vote for lynching. (Active, One-time use, Day-time, Dual-nature)
Rioter - This player can double another's lynching vote. (Active, One-time use, Day-time, Dual-nature)
Soother - This player can block another's lynching vote. (Active, One-time use, Day-time, Dual-nature)
 
Koodauw - 3 - Southern Dad, Moyank, Twietee
Moyank - 3 - Koodauw, WoodNUFC, Rick Snagwell
Sythas - 2 - Abijnk, TechGod
QoS - 2 - Aggie
Rick Snagwell - 2 - QoS, ScepticalScribe

No Vote - Sythas

Thank you.

Very well; I suggest rick, or WoodNUFC be asked questions of who and what they are.
 
On my tally, I did not count Koodauw's power... if it double moyank have 4

Ah. I see. Many posts on this particular game need to be re-read.

So, this means that Koodauw doubled his own vote (the vote he cast for Moyank), rather than the votes he received himself.

Very well then. However, one can be the Rioter and Not be a Hero, can one not? This act has not necessarily quelled any suspicions I have had of him, if anything, the contrary. And what are his reasons for being suspicious of Moyank?

Back to Koodauw for now, until persuaded otherwise....
 
Ah. I see. Many posts on this particular game need to be re-read.

So, this means that Koodauw doubled his own vote (the vote he cast for Moyank), rather than the votes he received himself.

Very well then. However, one can be the Rioter and Not be a Hero, can one not? This act has not necessarily quelled any suspicions I have had of him, if anything, the contrary. And what are his reasons for being suspicious of Moyank?

Back to Koodauw for now, until persuaded otherwise....

Yes, they can. The Rioter role isn't limited to good guys. And frankly, I'm looking for a good explanation for the votes against me as well. Of the 3 votes, at least one has to be a WW who jumped on a bandwagon.

And rick, let's not turn this into a battle of the sexes...

Let's just try to find bad guys.
 
Yes, they can. The Rioter role isn't limited to good guys. And frankly, I'm looking for a good explanation for the votes against me as well. Of the 3 votes, at least one has to be a WW who jumped on a bandwagon.

And rick, let's not turn this into a battle of the sexes...

Let's just try to find bad guys.

yeah not a battle of the sexes... just teasing
 
I'm going to remove my vote from Mo' as I ponder the information above.

no vote

What do we know?

Day 1 - SD was lynched, and the necromancer revived him.
Night 1 - Ravenvii was killed
Day 2 - Tomorrow was voted off, but was saved by the executioner at the expense of Pluto.
Night 2 - DP was killed
Day 3 - The Hunter (Aggie) kills Tomorrow (WW)

Anything else?
 
It's really a little late for all these "no votes" from several of the players at this point in the game. It just causes a lot of confusion, IMO. Stick to a vote or change it, but multiple changes makes it difficult to follow.

Men....so indecisive.:)
 
There are a little too many variables in this game for my taste or WW.

Yeah. I like the creative aspect, and the fact that every player likely has a role, but not sure having this many that swing either way is ideal.

DP is not a player I pay much attention to regarding his theories about anything regarding these games.

:rolleyes:

Take their clothes off?

Weren't you just admonishing Tomorrow for his "ball in the hole" comment? Glass houses.

I'm not really convinced to take my vote off of rick snagwell. I think we may be getting to the point where if the Seer or Undertaker are still with us, perhaps they could help.
 
Sythas

Koodauw - 4 - Southern Dad, Moyank, Twietee, ScepticalScribe
Sythas - 3 - Abijnk, TechGod, WoodNUFC
Moyank - 2 - Koodauw, Rick Snagwell
QoS - 1 - Aggie
Rick Snagwell - 1 - QoS,
 
I'm not really convinced to take my vote off of rick snagwell. I think we may be getting to the point where if the Seer or Undertaker are still with us, perhaps they could help.

Agreed as well.

who would you go with though? koodauw, woodnufc and abjink flew under the radar the whole game (and that isn't just about voting or not) but always pop in if their names get bolded. just to disappear afterwards again. real-life is fine, we all lead it but it's still a very effective way to play a ww (although everybody says they wouldn't play it that way). And I'm not even speaking of techgod...

I'm game to change vote if there's a chance to save Moyank. rick?

----------

ninja'd :rolleyes:

sythas? argh not sure...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.