Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

[WW] Simple Werewolville Mach 2 - Game Over, wolves win.

My order of suspicion.

techfreak85
iBookG4user
Mexbearpig
renewed
Intell
NathanMuir
iBlue
-aggie-

I'm not sure who to vote for. I'm going to change my vote from techfreak85 to Mexbearpig.

No suspicious reasons for changing my vote - I just think the latter looks a bit more werewolfy.
 
iBlue said:
In order of my suspicions, with who I suspect most first:

techfreak85
Mexbearpig
iBookG4user
renewed
Intell
NathanMuir
ShaunPriest
-aggie-


Of course I have no idea but I thought I'd at least put this out there.
Click to expand...

Just to provide myself some defense with voting records. I have never once changed my vote to speed things up and I have not given in to the mob mentality. I try not to vote for someone if I don't think that they are the werewolf. I was wrong with fireshot, but I consistently voted for them and did not switch my vote because I thought it was them.
 
iBookG4user said:
Just to provide myself some defense with voting records. I have never once changed my vote to speed things up and I have not given in to the mob mentality. I try not to vote for someone if I don't think that they are the werewolf. I was wrong with fireshot, but I consistently voted for them and did not switch my vote because I thought it was them.
Click to expand...

This is what I noticed when I went back and looked and the reason why I included you with ShaunPriest on list of people who I don't think are wolves.
 
ShaunPriest said:
I'm not sure who to vote for. I'm going to change my vote from techfreak85 to Mexbearpig.

No suspicious reasons for changing my vote - I just think the latter looks a bit more werewolfy.
Click to expand...

Uh, because he has bear in his name?? :)

I'm on my iPhone commuting. Can someone tell me what are tallies are? It's really hard to tell.
 
-aggie- said:
Uh, because he has bear in his name?? :)

I'm on my iPhone commuting. Can someone tell me what are tallies are? It's really hard to tell.
Click to expand...

I would, but after confusing ShaunPriest for Techfreak85, I don't trust myself to do anything right in this game right now.

I'm going to have a drink and come back later. If someone hasn't done by then, then I'll try to tally the votes. :p
 
Thanks Nathan.

What would help is if those who've changed their vote would remember to go unbold their previous vote(s). Friggin' confusionmental for this aggie. :)

Well, no one is rushing to make a tally. Here's how I think it is looking on my little iPhone screen:

Techfreak. 4 (aggie, iblue, mexbearpig, nathanmuir)
Mexbearpig. 2 (shaunpriest and Intell)
2 or 3 others with just 1 vote
 
Just a recommendation to the Hunter:

If I was a werewolf at this stage in the game I would be more likely to eat myself or -aggie- as most people seem to agree we are the least likely to be werewolf's.

If I were a werewolf I would be more inclined to not eat the players who others are somewhat suspicious about as it would distract players from discovering the real werewolf faster.

That being the case I recommend tonight that the Hunter protects -aggie- or myself as we are easy targets for the werewolf's.

Does any of that make sense? I'm half asleep and the iPhone sucks as typing posts.
 
ShaunPriest said:
Just a recommendation to the Hunter:

If I was a werewolf at this stage in the game I would be more likely to eat myself or -aggie- as most people seem to agree we are the least likely to be werewolf's.

If I were a werewolf I would be more inclined to not eat the players who others are somewhat suspicious about as it would distract players from discovering the real werewolf faster.

That being the case I recommend tonight that the Hunter protects -aggie- or myself as we are easy targets for the werewolf's.

Does any of that make sense? I'm half asleep and the iPhone sucks as typing posts.
Click to expand...

Intell said:
So true.
Click to expand...

You do understand that we’re still voting on a villager to be a WW, right? We stand at 4 votes for techfreak.
 
You do understand that my "So true" comment was about typing out posts on an iPhone. I have no comment on anything else posted in post #387.
 
-aggie- said:
Thanks Nathan.

What would help is if those who've changed their vote would remember to go unbold their previous vote(s). Friggin' confusionmental for this aggie. :)

Well, no one is rushing to make a tally. Here's how I think it is looking on my little iPhone screen:

Techfreak. 4 (aggie, iblue, mexbearpig, nathanmuir)
Mexbearpig. 2 (shaunpriest and Intell)
2 or 3 others with just 1 vote
Click to expand...

Seems to me your tally is correct:

Votes so far:

techfreak85: 4 (aggie, iBlue, Mexbearpig, NathanMuir)
Mexbearpig: 2 (Intell, ShaunPriest)
NathanMuir: 1 (iBookG4user)
iBlue: 1 (techfreak85)

Now all we need is renewed’s vote.
 
Intell said:
You do understand that my "So true" comment was about typing out posts on an iPhone. I have no comment on anything else posted in post #387.
Click to expand...

I see that now. No reason to get irritated.:)

willbro said:
Now all we need is renewed’s vote.
Click to expand...

I just noticed he didn’t vote last time willbro was lynched, and he came into the thread earlier today and didn’t vote.
 
Sorry guys, I failed to make it clear in the rules that as soon as someone reaches a majority, the voting is done. Technically, this happened when techfreak85 hit 5 with ShaunPriest's initial vote. I failed to notice this, and he ended up changing his vote, making it seem as if there were more voting to do. Since I did not make this clear and a lot of voting has occurred, it would be unfair to end the vote now.

I did not make this up out of thin air, that's how the other games have been run. From now on, since everyone is aware, it will be recognized when the majority is hit.

Also, you do not have to lynch someone. You can agree, via majority, to skip a lynching.
 
chrmjenkins said:
Sorry guys, I failed to make it clear in the rules that as soon as someone reaches a majority, the voting is done. Technically, this happened when techfreak85 hit 5 with ShaunPriest's initial vote. I failed to notice this, and he ended up changing his vote, making it seem as if there were more voting to do. Since I did not make this clear and a lot of voting has occurred, it would be unfair to end the vote now.
Click to expand...

So who's dead?
 
chrmjenkins said:
Sorry guys, I failed to make it clear in the rules that as soon as someone reaches a majority, the voting is done. Technically, this happened when techfreak85 hit 5 with ShaunPriest's initial vote. I failed to notice this, and he ended up changing his vote, making it seem as if there were more voting to do. Since I did not make this clear and a lot of voting has occurred, it would be unfair to end the vote now.

I did not make this up out of thin air, that's how the other games have been run. From now on, since everyone is aware, it will be recognized when the majority is hit.

Also, you do not have to lynch someone. You can agree, via majority, to skip a lynching.
Click to expand...

We know all that, but so much was going on, it was impossible to tell the majority was reached (as you can see I kept asking people to tally the votes, but no one would, and it was hard to do this on an iPhone). If we skip a lynching, don’t the WW’s get to do their thing?

Edit: Might I suggest people not be allowed to go back to a previous post and change a vote, but make a new one. This is one of the sources of confusion. The other was people having multiple people bolded.
 
I didn't notice we'd reached a majority and I knew about that rule. Ooops. Since we're able to I'd like to see how renewed votes and I don't mind waiting a bit for him to do that because it may tell us something.

I was thinking last night that in the other complex game the villagers are trying to work together and they've done that (partially) by a few of them revealing themselves. It cost Melrose in the end but their village has a much better chance now.
It would be easier for our villagers with powers to do their work if revealing their roles were not such a dangerous move. In the next game I would really like to see the hunter be able to protect whoever they wish however many times, including consecutively. That way maybe the seer can reveal their role and the hunter can protect them every time. (the hunter would need to keep their role quiet) It would be easy enough for us to figure out if the seer is authentic based on what they say and how we lynch accordingly. Less innocent deaths.

It is VERY difficult to determine who the wolves are in this game given the forum setting and this may create a more organized way to figure things out. The seer still has to choose the scans carefully (maybe we can make requests/hints as well) so it's not a major villager advantage but I think it could make us powerless villagers feel less like sitting ducks.

Just a thought.
 
iBlue said:
In the next game I would really like to see the hunter be able to protect whoever they wish however many times, including consecutively.
Click to expand...

That's an interesting thought although you'd have to be careful so as to not make the hunter too powerful. Perhaps increasing the limit to protecting a village two nights in a row would be handy, though. That wouldn't increase their power too much, but it would help the seer to feel a bit more at ease when revealing their role.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back