So with so few people each day is pretty crucial. Everyone is just throwing out some votes, with no reasoning behind them. (excluding plutionius) I feel like a retaliatory vote by anyone is a bit irresponsible unless you have reasoning but haven't expressed it.
I also think its a good cover if both SS and Plutionius are wolves. Have Plutonious lead the charge, and then look good for the rest of the game. High risk high reward.
With such a fast pace we really are guessing more so than deducing anything.
No, not irresponsible, just the only reason so far that I actually have to vote for (or against) anyone. In fact, the speed of events caused me to miss last night, and I was determined to register some sort of vote tonight, rather than stumble into a second consecutive no-show two nights in a row.
In truth, in a game of this speed, there is little to guide us on; the only problems I can see are the few participating, and the rapid turnarounds, which - I suspect - may serve to benefit the WWs, as there is little time to think, mull over posts, votes and other evidence, and less time to react. Indeed, you have remarked upon the pace, which leaves little room for anything other than guesswork, rather than being able to rely on an accretion of evidence.