Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So with so few people each day is pretty crucial. Everyone is just throwing out some votes, with no reasoning behind them. (excluding plutionius) I feel like a retaliatory vote by anyone is a bit irresponsible unless you have reasoning but haven't expressed it.

I also think its a good cover if both SS and Plutionius are wolves. Have Plutonious lead the charge, and then look good for the rest of the game. High risk high reward.

With such a fast pace we really are guessing more so than deducing anything.

No, not irresponsible, just the only reason so far that I actually have to vote for (or against) anyone. In fact, the speed of events caused me to miss last night, and I was determined to register some sort of vote tonight, rather than stumble into a second consecutive no-show two nights in a row.

In truth, in a game of this speed, there is little to guide us on; the only problems I can see are the few participating, and the rapid turnarounds, which - I suspect - may serve to benefit the WWs, as there is little time to think, mull over posts, votes and other evidence, and less time to react. Indeed, you have remarked upon the pace, which leaves little room for anything other than guesswork, rather than being able to rely on an accretion of evidence.
 
So with so few people each day is pretty crucial. Everyone is just throwing out some votes, with no reasoning behind them. (excluding plutionius) I feel like a retaliatory vote by anyone is a bit irresponsible unless you have reasoning but haven't expressed it.

I also think its a good cover if both SS and Plutionius are wolves. Have Plutonious lead the charge, and then look good for the rest of the game. High risk high reward.

With such a fast pace we really are guessing more so than deducing anything.

There isn't really much to go on, is there? I mean, feel free to enlighten the crowd if you can find some analysis from that day one vote - which is all we have right now. I'd be willing to listen.
 
There isn't really much to go on, is there? I mean, feel free to enlighten the crowd if you can find some analysis from that day one vote - which is all we have right now. I'd be willing to listen.

i feel the same way, and its the weekend...but we need to vote to get it too night time and atleast have the time stop for the weekend?

narrow it down to two again?

and that boston avatar, vomit. :)
 
Eh. I'm pausing time as of yesterday at 9:03 EDT. It will resume at 9:00 AM EST on Monday. All votes since 9:03 EDT has been voided (hint: there has been none).

So 58 hours remain.

See you all on Monday.
 
Raven is the clock running yet or were you going to post something say its started again?

If it is running Ill vote for Philbeeney in an effort of self preservation.

But think both QoS and SS deserve a closer look. They both were quick to state "there isnt much to go on" defence when I asked people to explain votes. Because there isnt much to go on, is the exact reason we could use a bit of an explanation with votes.

Not sure we have to to turn the votes though.
 
Raven is the clock running yet or were you going to post something say its started again?

If it is running Ill vote for Philbeeney in an effort of self preservation.

But think both QoS and SS deserve a closer look. They both were quick to state "there isnt much to go on" defence when I asked people to explain votes. Because there isnt much to go on, is the exact reason we could use a bit of an explanation with votes.

Not sure we have to to turn the votes though.

Didn't he post that the votes were reset ?

Why QoS ? Scepticalscribe since she tried to extend the first day by not voting when she could have (post 85). I would also not be adverse to voting for Koodauw if we need to get a majority.
 
Didn't he post that the votes were reset ?

Why QoS ? Scepticalscribe since she tried to extend the first day by not voting when she could have (post 85). I would also not be adverse to voting for Koodauw if we need to get a majority.

You should go back and read what I and Raven both wrote. ;)
 
All the votes for the current day have been voided according to ravenvii's post. At least up until ~ 2 hours ago.

----------

But think both QoS and SS deserve a closer look. They both were quick to state "there isnt much to go on" defence when I asked people to explain votes. Because there isnt much to go on, is the exact reason we could use a bit of an explanation with votes.

That's a silly assertion. There isn't much to go on is a fact. We know 2 wolves are alive, we may or may not have our 2 loyal specials alive (maybe they were WoodNUFC and chrmnjenkins)... so there's literally nothing to go on unless you are a special aside from the first days votes which I don't see anything in.

Why QoS ? Scepticalscribe since she tried to extend the first day by not voting when she could have (post 85). I would also not be adverse to voting for Koodauw if we need to get a majority.

I think she was genuinely confused. It happens.
 
Honestly I'm just gonna vote for Koodauw unless a majority shifts another way. I think Koodauw is being fairly aggressive... I'm also not feeling this game too much. So if people want to vote me out that's fine (at the cost of a citizen). I know in my prior games I've been vocal about voting out disinterested people... I can take the repercussions of that if need be.

The short time frame sounded a lot more interesting in my head. In practice, not so much. Really if we guess wrong today and tomorrow, we lose. 3 lynchings and the game is over. Games are barely getting interesting by day 3 normally. This seems more of a crap shoot than the other games did even.

I also think the weekend shutdown was a bad call since it was discussed prior that we'd play through the weekend. Plus it's not like it started Saturday morning... we had all day Friday to do our stuff. No I'm not saying this because I'm a werewolf... I'm saying it because thems were the rules...

If you're the seer or whatever and still alive, your smidge of information is likely best stated today. I assume the hunter protected themselves so unless you're getting ganged up on, your outing isn't useful... unless you didn't protect yourself, then you also might state your information.
 
Honestly I'm just gonna vote for Koodauw unless a majority shifts another way. I think Koodauw is being fairly aggressive... I'm also not feeling this game too much. So if people want to vote me out that's fine (at the cost of a citizen). I know in my prior games I've been vocal about voting out disinterested people... I can take the repercussions of that if need be.

The short time frame sounded a lot more interesting in my head. In practice, not so much. Really if we guess wrong today and tomorrow, we lose. 3 lynchings and the game is over. Games are barely getting interesting by day 3 normally. This seems more of a crap shoot than the other games did even.

I also think the weekend shutdown was a bad call since it was discussed prior that we'd play through the weekend. Plus it's not like it started Saturday morning... we had all day Friday to do our stuff. No I'm not saying this because I'm a werewolf... I'm saying it because thems were the rules...

If you're the seer or whatever and still alive, your smidge of information is likely best stated today. I assume the hunter protected themselves so unless you're getting ganged up on, your outing isn't useful... unless you didn't protect yourself, then you also might state your information.

I would like to play, so if you would kindly remove your vote for me that would be great.
 
Eh. I'm pausing time as of yesterday at 9:03 EDT. It will resume at 9:00 AM EST on Monday. All votes since 9:03 EDT has been voided (hint: there has been none).

So 58 hours remain.

See you all on Monday.

Also BTW the votes weren't cleared or reset.

What did I misread in ravenvii's post? He said that all votes since 9:03 EDT had been voided.
 
But think both QoS and SS deserve a closer look. They both were quick to state "there isnt much to go on" defence when I asked people to explain votes. Because there isnt much to go on, is the exact reason we could use a bit of an explanation with votes.

This is dumb. If there's nothing to go on, how can there be an explanation for votes? You also failed/refused to provide any theories yourself, per usual. Koodauw, because his reasoning is really terrible again.

I thought the idea of a quick game was cool, but it seems to also be promoting one liners and less to go on with votes. So I dunno, but I suppose I'll save my thoughts until the end.
 
What did I misread in ravenvii's post? He said that all votes since 9:03 EDT had been voided.

Maybe I should've put PM in there.

It so happens that there were no votes after 9:03 PM so in effect none of the votes are voided.

Re: letting the time run during the weekend, the game would probably be over already and people will come on and be like "oh wow it's over already? I was watching [insert sport team here] and completely forgot!!1"

:p
 
Maybe I should've put PM in there.

But it so happens that there were no votes after 9:03 PM so in effect none of the votes are oided.

Re: letting the time run during the weekend, the game would probably be over already and people will come on and be like "oh wow it's over already? I was watching [insert sport team here] and completely forgot!!1"

:p

Well now I have no clue what the vote count is.

I agree the weekend should have not counted. But it was stated prior to the game starting that it would count. That's the only thing I think went awry.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.