Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

WWDC 2026 to Showcase Apple's 'AI Advancements'

Jarman74 said:
After a long string of embarrassing setbacks (starting with the Siri acquisition back in 2010) the fact that Apple is finally talking about ‘AI advancements’ suggests that this could be one of the most consequential WWDCs to date, and a genuine watershed moment for Siri’s development.
Click to expand...
you forgot /s
 
  • Love
Reactions: Wx_Man
Funny, I turned on Siri again a week or so ago and hated it talking to me at random times when uncalled for and I turned it off again. I really can't imagine why I'd turn it back on, unless it was linked to a replicator.
 
1774299123458.png





1774298669724.png

Gemini knows the future
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Disagree
Reactions: Lioness~, UpsideDownEclair, Think|Different and 1 other person
name99 said:
This is what happens when everyone on the thread wants to virtue signal.
Let's not do that!

What is Apple's SINGLE comparative advantage? ie what do people pay extra for?
It's UI (broadly understood). The significance to Apple of AI is how it allows for modified UI. Everything else doesn't matter. Whether OpenAI or Google or xAI or Anthropic supply your chatbot or the intelligence in your <medical app/law app/programming app/logistics app> doesn't matter; what matters to Apple is that you're running that app on your mac and your phone (and maybe soon your watch).

Which means that what Apple has been concerned about over the past few years is not creating "the best model in the world", whatever that means (a title that seems to change every month). Instead they've been focussed on what the previous paragraph implies:
1. what does AI mean for UI generally? Obviously you want a "smarter" Siri, you want better image generation, but think more broadly. Could AI classify your email? Organize your files? Figure out the "best" 20% of your photos and throw away the rest?

2. how much AI should be running locally? Running on Apple servers? Running on 3rd party servers? No-one can be sure, so they've been building a HW platform that is as capable as any of adapting to however this turns out. I've pointed out before that people are experimenting right now with running massive (like 400B parameter) models on iPhones by streaming in weights from flash. Is this a cute trick? Or is it harbinger of the future?

3. maybe we'll land up with a model that's bifurcated, but so seamlessly that no-one notices.
For example one problem that's only going to get worse is the issue of "personality". If the big model supplies the personality you care about, that's a problem when the big model updates.
A second problem is intimate personal knowledge. I don't want reading recommendations based on what 300M idiots are reading, I want recommendations based on my skill level, my interests, and what I do vs don't already know.
A third problem is on-going learning. This still hasn't been cracked; the best we really have is huge contexts that just keep growing. And maybe it can't be cracked at the hypermodel level?

What all three suggest is a scheme whereby an extremely personalized model lives on my device, knows all about me, sports a personality I like, and is continually learning [that's what it would *mean* in part, to know all about me]. This model in turn handles trivial questions and tasks locally, but also has a switchboard that can route questions/tasks as appropriate to the hyperscalers.

Point is: all this is very different from what is being discussed in this thread and in the general media chatter. As always people can quote "skate to where the puck will be" a thousand times while never understanding what it means even once.
I strongly suspect Apple is skating to where the puck will be, and in a way beyond everyone else.

Apple Intelligence was something of a flub, but then so was Copilot everywhere. No-one *knows* the optimal paths going forward. If we score
- Apple Intelligence was (possibly) a dumb move, trying to say "we're relevant, we're doing something" without the important parts yet ready. As I always say -- you CANNOT let your marketing team drive the schedule! Every time Apple (or other tech companies) do this the result is tears.
- Much of the behind the scenes Apple AI stuff is quite adequate.
The translation stuff, for example, is about Google level (though not as many languages). The current spell check stuff is, I think, about the best its been -- but apparently ruined by an unrelated stupid bug to do with touch tracking that makes it appear more stupid than it is. The image recognition stuff is good enough and keeps improving.
Along with that much of the language stuff is lousy, at least in part because the best language tech we have, in LLMs, isn't yet capable of learning. So email filing feels dumb because the machinery, such as it is, for learning the patterns in my email is terrible. We have adequate "understanding" of each email coupled with inadequate "what to do once you've understood the email". Same thing with the writing stuff, and even with the spelling stuff.
On the other hand, the connecting APIs to LLMs (as demo'd at WWDC last year) and the recent integration of LLMs into XCode (initially as "assist", now as agentic) seem to be going reasonably well, especially when you understand that the goal of Apple is not to be leading edge, it's to round off all the sharp edges, ensure the safety, security and ease of use, that get ignored by the people six months to a year ahead of Apple who are just experimenting wildly with what is possible.

Note the common thread in all this. Most of this wouldn't be fixed by a better model, that's not where the problems are. Which means it's simply not useful to say "Gemini is so much better". It's not clear that Gemini *is* so much better, not in the ways that are going to matter going forward.

I certainly don't *know* that Apple have a solution to all of this (they seem to have personalization under control, but the technical problem of on-going learning remains). But I think they understand what's going to matter *to them* in five years more than the public do. And they are executing to achieve those five year goals better than people appreciate.
Click to expand...
- - = ChatGPT?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: burgman
Wooo, it's time to get STOKED for the ALL NEW Siri. For the FIRST TIME EVER, Siri features true personalization and on-screen awareness, powered by the best-in-class Apple Intelligence. 2026 is truly the year of AI!

But seriously, anybody think Apple will be transparent and admit their "Built for Apple Intelligence" hype for the iPhone 16 series was nothing more than vaporware?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wx_Man
The great expectations created by the Apple Hype and advertising in the 2024 iPhone 16 announcements and presentation were totally misleading and untruthful at best. Closing in on two years since that "big announcement" of vaporware and what do we have now? Simple,- Vaporware!

The iPhone hardware can see more memory and all three cameras are now 48Mp, but those "implements" could have been done at any time as Apple controls what plays with the next years CPU.

So this is just more dragging the carrot in front of the masses who crawl even faster to get the glitter. All hope for anything worthwhile has turned, for many, to disgust because we are not fooled by the same word salad repeating every year.

An example of the con is the new MacBook Neo that has only 8GB of memory.

Remember two years ago Apple said all computers will need 16GB of memory for AI which really pumped up the sales of the M4 hardware as the base models had 16GB of memory at higher prices. Apple now says the 8GB iPhone chip in the Neo can run AI. Boy talk about bait and switch.

There was no actual need to migrate to 16GB base memory, just creative sales by misrepresentation of what is actually necessary to run MacOS. My 8GB Neo is running MacOS just fine.

So the customer base has to try and decipher the words coming from Apple and decide which ones are just outright lies, which ones might be lies and which one are not lies but wishful thinking.

Tim and company are laughing all the way to the bank that they sucker pounched the crowd once again..
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: Wx_Man
WarmWinterHat said:
With all the personality and bravado of unpainted drywall.
Click to expand...
That actually would be an improvement over all the other bloviating, gaslighting cheery-bots who want to blow sunshine and unicorns up my nether-regions in order to increase my engagement metric that can then be used by <insert AI company’s name here> to justify putting their hand out to Wall Street for another 100 billion dollar round of investments.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WarmWinterHat
Unregistered 4U said:
- - = ChatGPT?
Click to expand...
Everything you said in your detailed and reasoned opinion piece would be true if Steve Jobs were still alive.

But we have Tim Apple’s Apple. And we are going into the second year of Apple AI Vaporware. This would never have happened under Steve’s watch.
 
I’m getting excited— I think they’re going to over deliver this time. Let’s hope there are some dazzle-worthy features.
 
rp2011 said:
The chasm between opinions on AI amazingly wide. Some like LeCun call current models a waste of time like a son in law that will never amount to anything, while others swear that it is just laying in wait ready to pounce the world into submission with it's autocomplete powers!
Click to expand...
It’s going to be the biggest disrupter of jobs in the history of the world. We are all in deep slop!
 
ThailandToo said:
It’s going to be the biggest disrupter of jobs in the history of the world. We are all in deep slop!
Click to expand...
Time to go to a trade school. Watching so many people working so hard to put themselves out of a job is painful to watch. C ring appreciates your sacrifices and wishes you well by email.
 
indefinite said:
I think Apple will actually release Apple Intelligence this time
Click to expand...

Define release?

  1. "You can download dev beta today — AI features are finally all available"
  2. "AI features will be rolled out one by one in upcoming developer beta updates"
  3. "All AI features will be in 27.0 GA later this year"
  4. "Many of the AI features will be available in 27.0 GA, and more of the features will be included in subsequent 27.x releases"
 
jole said:
Define release?

  1. "You can download dev beta today — AI features are finally all available"
  2. "AI features will be rolled out one by one in upcoming developer beta updates"
  3. "All AI features will be in 27.0 GA later this year"
  4. "Many of the AI features will be available in 27.0 GA, and more of the features will be included in subsequent 27.x releases"
Click to expand...
My money is on iOS 27.5 next March.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: jole
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back