Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You may have not noticed but this is a 17 years old forum discussing, amongst others, topics related to new technologies and innovation and how they may affect and have consequences on people's normal life, with a particular space dedicated to Apple products. Amongst thousands of users, there is still someone having fun playing with this kind of news.
Relax a bit.
Who isn't relaxed? I'm giving some perspective to the people acting like this is insane innovation. It doesn't exist and Apple doesn't make a habit of showing prototypes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Classie
Apple will produce this, but it will start at $2,000+ because it’s both a magical iPad AND a magical iPhone. Of course it will come with only 128gb of storage on the “base” $2,000 model...
 
if im going to be using my iphone quickly, it’s not worth spending 5 seconds to unfold with two hands and the refold later to put back in my pocket

No need. The whole point is that you can use it as a phone while it's folded.

then you’ll find that a lot of iphone apps won’t work with this new size, so it’s a guessing game when you unfold the phone to see if it takes advantage of this new screen real estate. not worth the 5 second foldout and foldin

That's an iOS problem. Perhaps why such devices will hit Android first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamezr
Apple will produce this, but it will start at $2,000+ because it’s both a magical iPad AND a magical iPhone. Of course it will come with only 128gb of storage on the “base” $2,000 model...

Would be a bargain considering the Samsung foldable is expected to be around the same cost.
[doublepost=1548288479][/doublepost]
I want it to fold to a clamshell to protect the screen, not the other way ...

Agree, that’s more along the lines of what I would consider one day, but it would need to be a whole lot thinner than prototypes out there right now. Setting myself up here, but if you could take the thickness of the new iPad Pro, smaller screen, make that foldable with some sort of innovative hinge, maybe use magnets in the four corners to protect each screen from touching, and obviously optimize the software for at least a few years, that would be something I could see selling.
 
The phone doesn't have a case. Would dropping this folding phone damage it? Especially the exposed edges.

I like it fully open. Folding it is just to put it in the jacket pocket.

What about a Mac mini size device you could roll to put in the jacket pocket or bend it around the wrist.
 
I'm surprised the design engineers never thought about wear and tear from all that bending......

If multiple forum posters are worried about the fragile screen, I'm sure the engineers are aware of the issue.
 
Why waste the space on the back? If there was just one fold you could use both sides.

The problem with all these designs is there has to be some movement in the screen to allow for the fold or you get a crease - think of the dust jacket on a book. This means the screen is never going to look or feel as good as a normal touchscreen. While I'm sure there will be some applications for this tech, solid screen devices are going to remain the most practical for everyday use.

If you've ever used a phone with a plastic screen you'll understand why all modern phones are covered in glass.

Gota agree, it's cool tech and I'm sure has some great potential but for a phone I'd rather have the simple and durable solid bar design.
 
Introducing the new iPhone Folding, the best iPhone ever, just starting from $2999. it will be shipped in 2 years, yeah~~~~~~
 
Foldable screens still have to deal with basic physics. There's no practical use for these that eclipse the inherent problems that won't be possible to overcome.

Now rigid hinged panels ala the westward concept are a much more exciting and plausible proposition.
[doublepost=1548307649][/doublepost]Simply put, folding and unfolding any material is extremely stressful and there's really only two materials where it is viable repeatedly without stress visible to the human eye over time: silk and pleated polyester. Find out how to make a screen out of either and this becomes viable. (hint: it won't)

the subject of origami for paper, or bending for metal or plastics. Folding and unfolding
ad infinitum is a vastly different problem. Metal hinges offer a possible solution, but for
a complex folding pattern the engineering process is overly complex, and hinged
mechanisms can accumulate friction, requiring a large amount of actuation forc

https://www.researchgate.net/public...BIOMIMETICS_AS_MATERIAL_THINKING_IN_ORIBOTICS
 
Last edited:
I really can not imagine anything like this coming out of Apple within the next 10 years. They move too slow.
 
Will there be much weight gain on this ? Will this make it a two handed operation when it’s fully open as I think phones inherently should be usable single handed... I’m happy to wait to see it in the flesh but at the moment it seems a solution to a problem I don’t have.
 
Apple should be all over this technology but will most likely not have the cojones.
You’re right, Apple neeeeeever introduces ground breaking products that change life as we know it. Nope. That always been
That is courage! Not removing a hardware feature most people in the world still use.
Wildy applying a technology to solve a problem that doesn’t exist isn’t courage—it’s misguided. Having the balls to broom a 100 year old technology to make room for progress is the very definition of stones. And that fact that the rest of the industry is following them is proof.
 
I really can not imagine anything like this coming out of Apple within the next 10 years. They move too slow.
And yet, they’ve created THE category defining product in multiple, massive new technology categories over the past 40 years that have changed life as we know it:

Apple II (first PC)
Macintosh (first user friendly PC with GUI)
LaserWriter (first networked printer)
Apple Talk (game changer)
iMac (game changer)
iPod (first of its kind, standard by which all others were measured)
iTunes (changed music, saved music industry from Napster)
iPhone (changed everything. on earth.)
iPad (first and still best)
Apple Watch (redefined the level of integration a smart watch could have, redefining healthcare, dominates the category)
AirPods (once again redefined a young category with the singular W1 chip that no other company could compete with, now the gold standard for mainstream users, they were the smallest earbuds with the best wireless connectivity at a time when existing earbuds were huge, cost $250-$350, and were buggy as hell)

Has Apple been perfect? Hardly. But to fantasize that Apple hasn’t been the most consistently innovative, game changing tech company at the forefront of new ideas for over the past 40 years is pure fantasy. Statements like yours are useless because they value cheap cynicism over the actual truth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 19callum93
What did you think when Apple got rid of the floppy drive? And SCSI? And optical? Or is that different?
I'm glad you ask that because Apple ditched the floppy at a time when everyone was still using mainly floppy – aka. 3 or 4 years too early. Same deal with the headphone jack now.
 
I'm glad you ask that because Apple ditched the floppy at a time when everyone was still using mainly floppy – aka. 3 or 4 years too early. Same deal with the headphone jack now.
That’s precisely the point! They led. Somehow we survived (I bought a cheap floppy drive to tide me over) and Apple grew. Amazing! And now no one uses floppies. They saw that future coming and pushed us there. Just as the near future will involve no 3.5mm ports. And eventually no wires at all.

You don’t lead by waiting until everyone else is doing what you know is right for the future. That’s called following. But I guess that doesn’t stop people from complaining that Apple doesn’t innovate. They do, just not how is suits complainers’ pet issues. FaceID is amazing tech, but people complain about the notch that contains it. Wires are going away, but people complain that they’re not ready. I say get an adapter and face the future.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ErikGrim
I'm glad you ask that because Apple ditched the floppy at a time when everyone was still using mainly floppy – aka. 3 or 4 years too early. Same deal with the headphone jack now.
You don’t get it. It wasn’t “too early”.

It’s not like changing away from floppies was inevitable, scheduled for a certain date. The industry changed a few years later because Apple led the way. They are the catalysts that help make change happen. Left to their own devices, the rest of the industry generally needs to be dragged kicking and screaming toward changes in standards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ErikGrim
You don’t get it. It wasn’t “too early”.

It’s not like changing away from floppies was inevitable, scheduled for a certain date. The industry changed a few years later because Apple led the way. They are the catalysts that help make change happen. Left to their own devices, the rest of the industry generally needs to be dragged kicking and screaming toward changes in standards.
Changing was definitely inevitable. If you study the history of computer storage all the way from punch cards and magnetic tape up to SSD storage, you will see that there are major innovations every decade or so. Apple definitely ditched the floppy too early. They just caused their users some inconvenience for a couple of years until the rest of the industry "caught up".

Same thing is happening now with USB-C and the headphone jack. I go to IT meetups all the time and always there is someone with a new MBP not being able to connect it to the projector and nobody has an adapter with them.
 
Apple will release their own foldable handset - probably in a couple of years after Xiaomi and Samsung have already done it and have had foldable handsets on the market for a year or two.

Who are the true innovators now?!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.