Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
There's an obvious issue with the "folding" phone concepts: the folded version is smaller than what most people's normal phone screen size would be, and the unfolded version isn't really a tablet sized screen. It's easy to see that it's not an improvement on the current large screen sizes for phones.
 
That is courage! Not removing a hardware feature most people in the world still use.
It’s a prototype bro...this isn’t reality.

The thing likely didn’t do anything other than what was in the teaser video. It might not have even had a proper processor, storage, camera, etc. It was likely just a screen.

Short answer: Possibly cool, but not ready for prime time (indicated by prototype stage) and tons of challenges to overcome. Probably no headphone jack either.

If you’re still mad about the headphone jack, get an Android. Oh wait, many of those removed the headphone jack too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: paul4339



Amidst increasing hype about foldable displays, Xiaomi has revealed that it is also working on its own flexible phone.


The Chinese mobile maker broke the news with a teaser video posted on Weibo that shows Xiaomi president and co-founder Lin Bin using what at first looks like a normal tablet device, until he folds back both sides of the display so that it resembles a distinctly phone-like form factor.

The physical power button is side-mounted on the device when in landscape orientation, which places it in a top-center location when in phone mode. In a neat touch, the size and orientation of the user interface also automatically adjusts in order to conform to the new dimensions of the display.

In a message accompanying the post, Bin wrote that the device is the result of the company overcoming technical challenges relating to folding displays, foldable hinges, flexible covers, and UI adaptation.

Bin admitted that what he hopes will become "the world's first dual-folding phone" is still just a prototype at this stage, but said that the company will consider mass producing it if the response from consumers is positive. Bin floated two possible names for the phone - the Mi Dual Flex and the Mi MIX Flex - although he said Xiaomi is open to suggestions from the public.

Last year, Samsung showed off its new Infinity Flex display technology in a device that features a 7.3-inch flexible display that can be folded in half. The company said it had developed an advanced composite polymer that's "flexible and tough" to replace the glass that's usually used as a display cover in smartphones.

Samsung is expected to formally announce its first commercially available foldable phone during its Galaxy S10 event on February 20 in San Francisco, California.

Rumors that Apple is developing an iPhone with a foldable display stretch back to December 2016, when it was reported that LG's display division would begin mass-producing foldable displays for smartphones as early as 2018. Apple was said to have chosen to work with LG Display and not Samsung out of fears that Samsung could get ahold of the sensitive tech.

LG is said to have created a dedicated task force to start developing a foldable OLED display for a future iPhone, while its siser company LG Innotek has a team developing a rigid flexible printed circuit board or (RFPCB) to go along with it.

LG has shown off several foldable display prototypes over recent years, including one that folds over like a book and a second that rolls up much like a newspaper.

Article Link: Xiaomi Reveals Dual-Folding Flexible Phone in Teaser Video

If Apple can’t design a durable laptop hinge using flex cables, why should I believe Apple will design a phone with a durable flex display?
 
No, but they’ll wait a couple of years to see what works and what doesn’t, and figure out what they can do to improve on the concept before releasing their own.

Or not release one at all if it turns out to be more of a gimmick than something useful.

Like the touchbar which is not at all gimmicky.
 
It usually go like this:

When a idea comes up and Apple has not yet implement this, people on here will dismiss as gimmick. (like OLED screen, like wireless charging).

Then Apple comes up with exactly same stuff, they will say Apple always not the first one to do, but always the one to make it actually good.

Then when Apple comes up with exactly same implemention, they they will say, they don’t care about competition. (Like wireless charging?)

I don't see it the same. OLED and wireless charging were definitely good advances, not gimmicky at all, but OLED's early on had issues (I'd imagine we can agree here, right?). Only in recent years have they been almost perfect. I think that's where Apple and their customers stand with most of this stuff. It's definitely good tech and a useful addition, but we are content waiting until the tech is a little more ready for prime time. Wireless charging was definitely an area Apple was late to the game, but it's not enough of a feature to warrant a change of platform. Similarly with this bendable screen tech - it's cool and the future use cases make sense, but it's just not really ready for the masses. I don't mind others coming out with it as we have to start somewhere, but I also don't mind waiting as I don't see the value. Hardware and software just aren't to a point where I need to drop my current gear for it.
 
Is it me or doesn't it looks like it is covered with cheap wavy clear plastic wrap.
 
All products have to start somewhere, and even though we as consumers always don’t see the benefit right away of how this will be useful in our daily lives, it takes time for things to evolve. I think foldable displays will be a part of the ‘tech future’ one way or the other. The question is, does Apple conjoin the likes of what Samsung and Xiaomi are already in progress developing.

When I read your post, The Below is exactly what came to mind... AND....

Two folds.. That would be cooler like how the phones in Westworld work:

tumblr_oh20kqgSZC1qjsc4fo1_500.gif



I want this.

though I get we're probably not quite there.
 
Looks cool, and bonus points for thinking of making a trifold.

With any folding screen though, I’d want to wait and see how durable they turn out to be before considering a purchase.

These foldable screens are more durable than MBpro laptop lids.
 
Is it me or doesn't it looks like it is covered with cheap wavy clear plastic wrap.

It isn't covered in it, that's what the screen is made of.

Open a magazine/book out all the way... notice how the cover isn't completely flat and requires a bit of give to account for that motion... This is an inherent problem all of these folding devices have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ErikGrim
So if the screen is made from a flexible material then I guess we'll soon be seeing the end of broken/cracked smartphone screens?

Hmm, on second thoughts .... we may not see cracked glass screens but we may see problems with the flexible displays.
Ahhh, I guess we'll never win.
 
Last edited:
My new iPad Pro does that already

Haha, and hence why I returned mine. Wasn't waiting for it to get worse or cause issues. It would explain why screen protectors caused the screen to behave erratically on it. Apple's history speaks for itself. When an issues arises they wait for a majority of their users to abandon the device and move onto a new one, and once the lawsuits start flying offer some sort of half-assed solution.
 
That is courage! Not removing a hardware feature most people in the world still use.

Oh the bravery in working on a demo! LOL. Please, every one of the major tech companies is exploring this technology. Apple is spending over a billion a month on R and D, but if their version of foldable phones is anything like this, thank goodness Apple doesn't do these "hey, here's what we're maybe going to do," as I would be embarrassed for them. Consumers aren't going to be interested in carrying an ugly, thick phone just to get a square plastic screen. Objectively, what would you be able to do with that screen when folded out completely, that you can't do with the current max size iPhones, Pixels, etc;, much less put up with the ugliness and thickness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baymowe335
I want a glass Westworld Style one. But the ribbon cables between the sections will probably fail.
 
The screen looks so exposed when folded, especially as the user will be gripping on the fold when using the small mode.

It seems a better solution would be to have the screen inside when folded, with a secondary smaller screen outside.
 
I'm really excited to see this tech start rolling out more. I know it's still in early stages but it's exciting for the potential. If Apple really views as the iPad Pro as a real laptop replacement, why not utilize this tech so that you're always carrying a phone and tablet in one?
 
I'm really excited to see this tech start rolling out more. I know it's still in early stages but it's exciting for the potential. If Apple really views as the iPad Pro as a real laptop replacement, why not utilize this tech so that you're always carrying a phone and tablet in one?

We need quality hardware and software for a product to add value. We aren't there yet.
 
I'm sure there's no point in responding, but your narrow view is where your argument falls apart. Apple has transformed into a services business, and it's a model that's working very well for them. Pure unit volume is meaningless if the profit is not there. And we all know that Apple is the king of profit regardless of volume. That's working very well for them.

Inferior technology? Yah, try again on that one. The number of apps available does not make a platform better.

Netflix is a services company, apple is a dongle company. Apple makes more profit with dongles then Netflix with the whole movie business, that’s, where YOUR service Fantasie, falls apart. To explain, I am a great visionary, therefore I can see, i wish You would follow!

Services don’t generate the profit apple wishes, apple can do NOTHING better then Netflix or Spotify. They only have their hw, and an insane strong brand, still.
[doublepost=1548260597][/doublepost]
I will bet Apple is four years behind in this technology! The natural innovative follower to Jobs was Forstall. Cook fired his path to a continued successful Apple for the next 30 years. Remember Nokia? Depending on iPhone is not good enough! Augmented reality is great, but until it’s seemless and built into contact lenses it will not have the mass adoption rate Apple needs.

Where else is Apple’s innovation going to come from? I am in Asia, and I can tell you that Apple has its ecosystem and NOTHING else. There is absolutely no way Apple can withhold its market share with iPhone by simply raising prices and put a fairly ridiculous notch with some 3D camera equipment in it! The stuff in Asia was obviously originally copied from Apple... but, Apple did nothing to keep innovating once Jobs died. It fired the only person who had the balls to innovate. It was just skeuomorphism or Apple Maps as to why he was fired. TC had a real threat behind him in Forstall.

I really love using iOS on my iPhone. But iOS on an $1800 iPad Pro is absurd and the CPU is simply wasted.

The hardware, other than the CPU, which should be running Macs, is so far behind competitors. The notch is such a joke. It looks so very stupid.

Samsung Galaxy phones are beautiful and don’t have a notch. And the hole punch is simply beautiful in comparison to the huge notch.

Huawei is going to blow past all these companies with phones and tablets.

I bought the Samsung Galaxy’s Tab S4. The OLED display is beautiful, and watching a movie on the 10.1” OLED display gives me almost the exact same movie size as the 12.9” Apple old outdated “retina” LCD. Who cares about the curve around the corners???

The iPad is a complete waste. I ridiculously bought the most expensive model thinking I would use the Cellular in it for movies, but I am addicted to the OLED display in my Samsung Galaxy Tab S4.

I am an Apple fanboy, but Apple needs a new generation of leaders who are younger and can make great decisions about technology... and where the future is truly headed. When Apple originally designed the iPad, Jobs decided it would be great as a phone!!! Why didn’t Apple also take that lead and start making the technology to make it into an iPad that folds into an IPhone? And glasses that see AR in real time, and work on the contacts instead of waiting for universities to discover the technology then steal it from them and pay a $400M lawsuit five years down the road...

They are at least four years behind because Apple doesn’t have a leader at the helm. And iPhone is not the future... iOS in AR is the future. MacOS and I will call it AiOS advanced iOS, should be running on every iPad and Mac. And on and on...

Apple cannot sell enough AirPods to make up for the loss of iPhone sales revenues. Apple cannot sell enough apps without selling more iPhones to grow its services. There is where Microsoft and Amazon are also kicking Apple’s a$$!!!

End of rant...

Love You, for that perfect rant!
[doublepost=1548261769][/doublepost]
“Being first” isn’t possible for Apple anymore - or at least not like it used to be. The global market has changed and China even more; no longer are they just manufacturers of products. They are more than capable of producing high end products and have the internet to show it. New technology doesn’t have to be refined to software/UI or cross platform integration. Prototypes and demos can be shown as innovation when in actuality it’s far from being a finished product.

Luckily Apple saw this long ago and started focusing on additional areas and features: cross platform integration, software/UI, health, human rights, personal security, sustainability and renewable energy.

Brilliant and crucial for continued success and staying ahead of the competition. It’s no longer possible to only compete with hardware features and “gimmicks”.

That’s the narrative the fakenews tries to push, too. The world has not changed that much as many people want to tell us. Most people just want plain, simple, awesome tech, not the whole good man story companies try to push nowadays.

No one cares about anything, everyone just whines and dines, more trucks then ever, more flights, more of everything, more surveillance, less Security, less personal rights.

Go check the facts! Don’t follow Tim’s advertising!
 
“Being first” isn’t possible for Apple anymore - or at least not like it used to be. The global market has changed and China even more; no longer are they just manufacturers of products. They are more than capable of producing high end products and have the internet to show it. New technology doesn’t have to be refined to software/UI or cross platform integration. Prototypes and demos can be shown as innovation when in actuality it’s far from being a finished product.

Luckily Apple saw this long ago and started focusing on additional areas and features: cross platform integration, software/UI, health, human rights, personal security, sustainability and renewable energy.

Brilliant and crucial for continued success and staying ahead of the competition. It’s no longer possible to only compete with hardware features and “gimmicks”.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.