Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Think again about what is in bold. Most mobile and computer devices allow YouTube to be played back in 4K. Most TVs have YouTube 4K HDR playback.

4K YouTube compressed to a lower resolution doesn't yield a better picture. Also If Google disables 4K for normal users, it's likely regulated to a non HDR 1080P not 1440P.
that statement is incorrect downscaling does improve quality of the picture. even if it’s compressed 4k video onto a lower resolution screen the increase of nitrate, and better aliasing than native resolution is always a pro . While true smaller screens you won’t notice much especially on a phone screen that statement of yours is still incorrect
 
I think it's pretty "ok" for services to charge for features. I much prefer that to any ads business model.
And when they alsoput ads even if you are subscribed? Just a few…
Next step for sure. Let them some few years.
With your attitude you are approving this no sense abuse
You already pay even not subscribed. They get your data and companies pay them money.
 
I have YouTube premium because it’s a godsend to not have ads on Apple TV. I watch hours of YouTube every day so it really is worth it. Limiting 4K to YouTube premium however, is stupid, and sounds exactly the same as how Netflix has an UHD option just for 4K on their platform.

Just curious, but what are you watching on YouTube to be spending hours on it every day?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tech for Kings
Just leaving this here...


Bro this recommendation changed my freakin’ life!
 
Just leaving this here...


Thank you so much!
 
I get the feeling that google is looking hard at their business model and the days of "free with ads" are coming to a close. Every google service is going to have to not only post profits buy grow revenue quarter over quarter or be shut down. Also, the days of release it as beta along side three other similar services and see which one sticks are gone too
 
I know a lot of posts here recommending extensions for watching YouTube in Safari, but I found that a painful experience and went back to the app. I don't need high resolutions to watch on a portable device, and can live with the ads that pay for the service I'm getting.
 
I still don't understand how my Macbook Pro 2016 doesn't get any ads on youtube but all my IOS devices suffer.

Anyone ever experienced that with their device? Maybe the Touchbar did something to youtube, lol.

Anyways, this is a terrible move!

Are you using safari? I notice that I don’t get ads when using macOS safari to view YouTube, but the downside is that I am capped at 1080p.
 
And a year from now they will introduce a tiered pricing where the $11.99 is just for 4K and if you want ad free you have to pay extra. And then six months after that they are going to raise the prices on all the plans. They might even introduce a on demand micro payment plan where you pay and extra fifty cents per 4K video you want to watch and some people will rack up charges exceeding the monthly payment plan.
 
Most YouTube I watch is on my phone over cellular, so I’m lucky if I’m at 720. But I don’t need to watch someone looking into a camera in 4K, I think the content will be the same.
 
Well good thing I'm currently getting it for 83 cents per month (used the Argentina address trick)
 
I'm a Youtube premium subscriber so I don't have to watch ads since there is so much classical music on Youtube. I really don't care since I don't have a 4K TV anyway and people should be grateful that they can watch Youtube for free in the first place.
It seems to me that you may have it backwards. Youtube should be grateful that people are watching. Without viewers, where would they be?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tech for Kings
Bit the bullet a few months back to get ad-free viewing and the more streamlined offline viewing as well (used to go through video download websites which works but can be a bit of a pain), considering my work involves a lot of down time in places where I don’t have wifi, and I kept busting through my data plan. Although it wouldn’t directly affect me — for now at least — restricting an industry standard resolution behind a paywall is absolutely stupid.
 
that statement is incorrect downscaling does improve quality of the picture. even if it’s compressed 4k video onto a lower resolution screen the increase of nitrate, and better aliasing than native resolution is always a pro . While true smaller screens you won’t notice much especially on a phone screen that statement of yours is still incorrect
Whenever you downscale resolution, example covert 4K to HD you are losing a lot of fine detail information against PQ by the removal of all that data just to shed pixels, this is known as a lossy encode from the source. Whenever you are watching a 4K YouTube and adjust it to be 1080P you can see the level of fine details be missing. Bitrates drop as the amount of data is reduced also.
 
Last edited:


YouTube may make watching videos in 4K quality on the platform exclusive to only YouTube Premium subscribers, according to screenshots posted by users on Twitter and Reddit.

General-YouTube-Feature-1.jpg

On Reddit (1,2) and Twitter, some users have started to recently notice that on iOS, and presumably across other platforms also, YouTube is now saying that in order to watch videos in 4K, the user must be a paying YouTube Premium subscriber. Not all users are seeing the 4K quality option blocked behind YouTube's paywall, and it's unclear if YouTube plans to move forward with this.

A standard YouTube Premium plan costs $11.99 in the United States and includes ad-free videos, background playback, and the ability to download videos for offline viewing. We've reached out to YouTube for comment on 4K video quality possibly becoming a YouTube Premium feature and we'll update this article if we hear back.

Article Link: You May Soon Need to Be a YouTube Premium Subscriber to Watch 4K Videos
I‘ll wait until 8k becomes available … can‘t be that much longer. Then 4k will be standard at no extra cost.
 
YouScrewed is doing what most paid steaming services do. If you want to stream 4K you have to pay more. Cable companies did this with HD when it became popular, and continued to do it. It sucks. But since YouScrewed offers a free with commercials version, it really sucks. After all, we already have to sit through way too many awkwardly placed ads, now they want bribe money to give us 4K. If you use an ATV you won't get good 4K through YouScrewed anyway. I won't pay for it. I will just watch the HD versions. After all, I don't watch feature films on YouScrewed, just stuff created by amateurs, and a lot of the so-called 4k those idiots post isn't true 4K anyway. YouScrewed is just a garbage company with mostly garbage for content, I'll never pay for that!

Lol ok. But you seem way too upset about this garbage.
 


YouTube may make watching videos in 4K quality on the platform exclusive to only YouTube Premium subscribers, according to screenshots posted by users on Twitter and Reddit.

General-YouTube-Feature-1.jpg

On Reddit (1,2) and Twitter, some users have started to recently notice that on iOS, and presumably across other platforms also, YouTube is now saying that in order to watch videos in 4K, the user must be a paying YouTube Premium subscriber. Not all users are seeing the 4K quality option blocked behind YouTube's paywall, and it's unclear if YouTube plans to move forward with this.

A standard YouTube Premium plan costs $11.99 in the United States and includes ad-free videos, background playback, and the ability to download videos for offline viewing. We've reached out to YouTube for comment on 4K video quality possibly becoming a YouTube Premium feature and we'll update this article if we hear back.

Article Link: You May Soon Need to Be a YouTube Premium Subscriber to Watch 4K Videos
It would be a pretty stupid move, considering the add revenue from non subscribers
 
I'm a Youtube premium subscriber so I don't have to watch ads since there is so much classical music on Youtube. I really don't care since I don't have a 4K TV anyway and people should be grateful that they can watch Youtube for free in the first place.
Nothing is free, we're the add revenue income 😏
 
It would be a pretty stupid move, considering the add revenue from non subscribers
One of the joys of YouTube is all the 4K travel, walking, and hiking videos shot around the world. If you been stuck at home these last 2 years has likely been of great benefit for those non-subscribers. Now comes along Google and they are like a cable company and feel anything more then HD is premium subscription needed. I do wish Apple would make a similar service for competition to YouTube, especially with this rumor. ;)
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.