While not a cool move… I will say that the $13 I spend on YouTube Premium is the best money I spend on streaming every month.
The new attitude, everything you do should be for free, or I'll steal it. Everything I do, I'm entitled to be paid top dollar for...I'm a Youtube premium subscriber so I don't have to watch ads since there is so much classical music on Youtube. I really don't care since I don't have a 4K TV anyway and people should be grateful that they can watch Youtube for free in the first place.
I am too and totally agree.this is not a good move and i am a youtube premium subscriber.
In the same vein, YT Premium Lite is spuriously crippled. Seems like it’s more about forcing people to purchase YT Music than it is about YT itself.I am too and totally agree.
I pay Youtube to remove ads. Fair. But paying them to add previously free features?
Kinda depends on what kind of content you like.I like such kinds of statements. So where do you alternatively watch videos as everything is hosted on YouTube these days? Please don't mention Vimeo.
Good thing content creators can choose from all the other video providers which have flourished in the face of YouTube. It's not like below or at-cost pricing to kill off competitors, then aggressively pursuing revenue once they are mostly dead is anticompetitive or anything.Grateful? No! I'm a very important internet user and all content is supposed to be available at max quality for free and without ads! Why should I be be limited to measly 1080p - I'm watching on a 6" phone screen after all, I neeeedd 4K.
It is pretty easy to host your own video on a CDN these days. Tons of options that aren't YouTube: Vimeo, Cloudflare, AWS, Akamai, etc. I agree that more content creators should do that instead of farming out on YouTube.Good thing content creators can choose from all the other video providers which have flourished in the face of YouTube. It's not like below or at-cost pricing to kill off competitors, then aggressively pursuing revenue once they are mostly dead is anticompetitive or anything.
Many of us just slowed/stopped watching as YouTube, vs spending over $120 a year for them to let me use features the OS provides or which used to be free before they paywalled them.honestly, how can people stand watching YouTube without a Premium subscription?
I have subscribed to YouTube for the last several years.
A few weeks ago, I was on a new phone and couldn't remember my Google password, so I couldn't access YouTube Premium. It was the most painful couple of days. Those ads were driving me crazy.
Now I understand why my friends/co-workers get mad when I share YouTube video links with them. they dont' have Premium and the ads must be driving them mad.![]()
I think it's pretty "ok" for services to charge for features. I much prefer that to any ads business model.90% of comments on this thread are bots praising YT Premium, because they already use the service.
That's not the point: the point is that Google is/will start charging to watch 4k content. How is that "ok"? I bet you're the ones that went crazy when Netflix or other streaming platforms increase the price by 1$, kekw.
This forum is truly pathetic sometimes.
K.I think it's pretty "ok" for services to charge for features. I much prefer that to any ads business model.
There is tons of streaming competition: Netflix, HBO Max, Prime Video, Apple TV+, Vimeo, etc. It has never been cheaper to host a 4K video on a fast CDN.Nice desperate try Google but no thanks, you can make all of your videos 144p and still I will not pay for premium. In fact please do so cause I'd love to see some streaming competition flourishing
Yea I was talking about streaming services focused on user creators not big Hollywood studiosThere is tons of streaming competition: Netflix, HBO Max, Prime Video, Apple TV+, Vimeo, etc. It has never been cheaper to host a 4K video on a fast CDN.