Sponsor block for safari and chrime is your medicineI have YouTube premium and still get ads by all these "channel sponsor" crap creators shove down our throats.
I don't have an issue with ads in a service I don't pay for, but when it's every two minutes or so in a 10 minute video it's ridiculous.Well, someone has to pay to have the video hosted. It would either be the person or the content creator. I don’t think you would have many content creators if they had to pay to make videos.
Sure, it’s annoying that there’s no right to free anything. I would love to have everything for free, but for some reason people don’t want to giveaway stuff for free.
I really hate this business model...YouTube was ad-free when it launched in 2005 - 2010ish. It purposely bent the rules to drive viewership to their site and make them the best video service in town.
Then over the past decade once they established pretty much a monopoly, they forced disruptive ads. And now they crammed more ads per minute. And they can do so because there isn't a comparable alternative.
This business model sucks.
And the price is insane!I wouldn’t mind subscribing to eliminate ads, but I just don’t want to give money to google.
Ads weren't an issue when they were 5-10 seconds long, and typically only at the beginning of a video. I used to disable my adblocker just to support content creators that I watched frequently.
The problem is now that YouTube went completely nuts with the ad frequency and length. A 10 minute video can have multiple, un-skippable ads with some of them being 60 seconds long. It's completely insane. And the content of the ads are usually irreverent, very bizarre, and sometimes in a different language..
If you want to know how it might end up, go look at a Reach local newspaper webbsite in the UK. Mostly adverts and those rubbish clickbait things like jumping toddlers in aeroplanes.They just don’t understand I'll take ads that aren't this excessive in presence and duration. I stand against them because they overdo it. This new tactic won't make me bend the knee and pay my way.
Yes, it comes to my mind the comparison with WhatsApp. They also started without any competition, established themselves as quite the monopoly as the free alternative to SMS (especially in countries like mine where iPhone market penetration was low), then once they got their captive user base, they are now planning to start introducing ads. I’d much prefer paying 1 or 2 or 5€ per year to maintain their infrastructure instead of this.I really hate this business model...YouTube was ad-free when it launched in 2005 - 2010ish. It purposely bent the rules to drive viewership to their site and make them the best video service in town.
Then over the past decade once they established pretty much a monopoly, they forced disruptive ads. And now they crammed more ads per minute. And they can do so because there isn't a comparable alternative.
This business model sucks.
Uhh, it is THE go to website for video content. Everyone from someone’s dog to the New York Times publishes there. It has many, MANY niche creators and videos. It’s actually very amazing, the worst apart about YouTube is Google, the people and the videos are amazing and many publish high quality content.I’m a bit puzzled by the success of YT and why is it popular. Are there really interesting contents and meaningful? All I hear on the rare case I go over there is “please subscribe”. For ads, I’m sure there will be an update to bypass, it’s a cat game and it will always be.
NO SUCCESS ALLOWED!!! Right?yawn... break up Google monopoly (search / ads / YouTube) and it magically solve itself... same with meta (it should have never been allowed to buy WhatsApp and Instagram)
I don't see how this will solve anything to combat ads. I can't think of a single streaming service that doesn't have adds. There are plenty of genre specific streaming services that can compete with YouTube akready. Twitch for example in the "Gaming / Chatting" segment comes to mind.Can we have a legit competitor to YT already.
I agree. There’s a point where it makes the experience unbearable.I don't have an issue with ads in a service I don't pay for, but when it's every two minutes or so in a 10 minute video it's ridiculous.
Are you still consuming YouTube content, as implied by your post? Seems a bit hypocritical, no? I'll consume your content but won't give you money because I disagree with the company that owns you?I wouldn’t mind subscribing to eliminate ads, but I just don’t want to give money to google.
Wow, is that the daylight between us you’re looking for?Are you still consuming YouTube content, as implied by your post? Seems a bit hypocritical, no? I'll consume your content but won't give you money because I disagree with the company that owns you?
I don’t go to YouTube to browse videos to watch.
They make more than enough.
They can easily make this cheaper, and still make a profit.
I am all for a company making a profit they have every right to do so, but Google has been caught many times doing shady stuff.
They do most of this already....
YouTube is deliberately slowing video loading for users with ad blockers enabled, in what appears to be an escalation in Google's campaign against ad-blocking extensions.
![]()
Multiple users across Reddit and the Brave browser forum report videos displaying black screens for the typical duration of pre-roll ads before content begins playing. The video player simultaneously shows a pop-up ("Experiencing interruptions? Find out why") with a link directing users to a Google support page about disabling ad-blocking extensions, suggesting the slowdowns are intentional.
The recent crackdown is a shift from YouTube's previous tactics of simply displaying warning messages or blocking video playback entirely. The new approach inserts artificial delays that mirror the time you would spend watching advertisements, basically forcing the same annoying time investment, whether ads are blocked or not.
It looks like specific user accounts previously flagged for ad-blocking behavior are being targeted, potentially bypassing detection methods that extension developers typically use to counter YouTube's measures. PCWorld confirmed the behavior using uBlock Origin Lite, while Brave browser users report similar experiences despite the browser's built-in ad-blocking capabilities.
![]()
Pop-up users see during delays (Image credit: PCWorld)
This latest move suggests YouTube is prepared to significantly degrade the user experience for non-paying users who refuse to view advertisements or subscribe to the $13.99 monthly YouTube Premium service, which offers an ad-free experience, offline downloads, and background playback.
For what it's worth, YouTube recently introduced a Premium Lite plan for $7.99/month that removes ads for most videos, excluding music content, Shorts, and when you search or browse.
Article Link: YouTube's Latest Move Against Ad Blockers: Video Delays
It has been like this for several days now.Welp, Vinegar no longer works (until it updates I hope). Just get a black screen and nothing else. Gonna try a few alternatives now