Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well, someone has to pay to have the video hosted. It would either be the person or the content creator. I don’t think you would have many content creators if they had to pay to make videos.

Sure, it’s annoying that there’s no right to free anything. I would love to have everything for free, but for some reason people don’t want to giveaway stuff for free.
I don't have an issue with ads in a service I don't pay for, but when it's every two minutes or so in a 10 minute video it's ridiculous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: russell_314
I'm astounded by the sheer number of ads for medicine, of all things. That's something I'd buy on advice from the health service or a chemist, not based on ads! But I guess enough people go out and buy this stuff anyway "just in case" that it's worth the advertising expense? Boggles the mind.
 
I really hate this business model...YouTube was ad-free when it launched in 2005 - 2010ish. It purposely bent the rules to drive viewership to their site and make them the best video service in town.

Then over the past decade once they established pretty much a monopoly, they forced disruptive ads. And now they crammed more ads per minute. And they can do so because there isn't a comparable alternative.

This business model sucks.

Vote with your eyes and stop using it.

or pay. Stuff isn't free.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: HighwaySnowman
I wouldn’t mind subscribing to eliminate ads, but I just don’t want to give money to google.
And the price is insane!

While I know ads are their way of doing business, they are totally out of hand. Way too long and multiple before the video and many times in the middle as well... Sometimes makes me click away from the video when seeing the amount of ad-time I need to use
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatTribble
Ads weren't an issue when they were 5-10 seconds long, and typically only at the beginning of a video. I used to disable my adblocker just to support content creators that I watched frequently.

The problem is now that YouTube went completely nuts with the ad frequency and length. A 10 minute video can have multiple, un-skippable ads with some of them being 60 seconds long. It's completely insane. And the content of the ads are usually irreverent, very bizarre, and sometimes in a different language..

I'm pretty sure the ad/content ratio should be illegal where I am. At least based on what I saw the last time I tried youtube without an ad blocker, which was ages ago.

I never was a video "content consumer" anyway (as in: paying for youtube is not worth it to me at any price), but I've stopped using youtube completely on all my iOS devices. I only very occasionally bring it up on my desktops where I run firefox+ublock origin.
 
They just don’t understand I'll take ads that aren't this excessive in presence and duration. I stand against them because they overdo it. This new tactic won't make me bend the knee and pay my way.
If you want to know how it might end up, go look at a Reach local newspaper webbsite in the UK. Mostly adverts and those rubbish clickbait things like jumping toddlers in aeroplanes.
 
The problem with Youtube ad's is that is has got out of control. There are always 2 ads before a start of a video, then you get a channel sponsor ad and then you get ad's during the video and sometimes another channel sponsor ad at the end of the video. I've seen ad lengths (not channel sponsor ads) go from 30 seconds to 3 minutes. The first ad blitz through in 30 seconds but then the 2nd ad begins and I notice it is 1:30 mins for an ad for online databases or online spreadsheets or online insurance. I am not going to sit through a 1:30 min ad for online insurance.

It sucks that if I want to watch a 15min youtube video I have to suffer at least 6 to 7 mins of ad's (youtube ads and channel sponsor ad's).
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula and Populus
I really hate this business model...YouTube was ad-free when it launched in 2005 - 2010ish. It purposely bent the rules to drive viewership to their site and make them the best video service in town.

Then over the past decade once they established pretty much a monopoly, they forced disruptive ads. And now they crammed more ads per minute. And they can do so because there isn't a comparable alternative.

This business model sucks.
Yes, it comes to my mind the comparison with WhatsApp. They also started without any competition, established themselves as quite the monopoly as the free alternative to SMS (especially in countries like mine where iPhone market penetration was low), then once they got their captive user base, they are now planning to start introducing ads. I’d much prefer paying 1 or 2 or 5€ per year to maintain their infrastructure instead of this.

However, ads on Meta’s service will probably start in low volume, unlike the abusive number and placement of ads on YouTube (also how annoying they usually are).

Same for other content platforms that have steadily increased their prices and now offer a paid, ad-supported plan. Let’s hope they don’t keep increasing the number of ads on this platforms.
 
I've been noticing this for the last couple of weeks, especially when watching a Mix of videos, when I have skipped from one video to the next. I thought it would be You Tube/Google related.

Well it isn't going to make me pay for your overpriced You Tube Premium **
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Parowdy
I’m a bit puzzled by the success of YT and why is it popular. Are there really interesting contents and meaningful? All I hear on the rare case I go over there is “please subscribe”. For ads, I’m sure there will be an update to bypass, it’s a cat game and it will always be.
Uhh, it is THE go to website for video content. Everyone from someone’s dog to the New York Times publishes there. It has many, MANY niche creators and videos. It’s actually very amazing, the worst apart about YouTube is Google, the people and the videos are amazing and many publish high quality content.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gigatoaster
Can we have a legit competitor to YT already.
I don't see how this will solve anything to combat ads. I can't think of a single streaming service that doesn't have adds. There are plenty of genre specific streaming services that can compete with YouTube akready. Twitch for example in the "Gaming / Chatting" segment comes to mind.

I for one am already at max saturation for "streaming services". What I would really like is one service to rule them all. I'd pay thru the nose for it to be add free if I could get all my NetFlix, Hulu, YouTube, Max, Disney+ etc via one account and service. Before we know it, Internet will be like old school Cable rofl...
 
I wouldn’t mind subscribing to eliminate ads, but I just don’t want to give money to google.
Are you still consuming YouTube content, as implied by your post? Seems a bit hypocritical, no? I'll consume your content but won't give you money because I disagree with the company that owns you?
 
Are you still consuming YouTube content, as implied by your post? Seems a bit hypocritical, no? I'll consume your content but won't give you money because I disagree with the company that owns you?
Wow, is that the daylight between us you’re looking for?

Guilty as charged. When a friend sends me a link I watch it out of politeness.
If I support someone on Patreon who hosts on YouTube I still watch it.
I don’t go to YouTube to browse videos to watch.

Don’t let perfection be the enemy of the good.
 
This might be at least partially justifiable if Google was trying to raise the revenues for content creators, but they have been aggressively screwing them over for the last few years as well.
 
They make more than enough.

Says who? $10 billion in revenue doesn't mean YouTube is profitable alone. For all we know, YouTube is a net loss but Alphabet is using YouTube to train AI in hopes of making their Gemini profitable.

They can easily make this cheaper, and still make a profit.

You think YouTube hasn't already been cutting costs here and there for the past decade?

I am all for a company making a profit they have every right to do so, but Google has been caught many times doing shady stuff.

That doesn't mean YouTube alone is profitable. We don't know this from financial reports they release.

They do most of this already....


Because most people are installing adblockers, making the problem worse already....
 
  • Angry
Reactions: HighwaySnowman


YouTube is deliberately slowing video loading for users with ad blockers enabled, in what appears to be an escalation in Google's campaign against ad-blocking extensions.

General-YouTube-Feature-Redux.jpg

Multiple users across Reddit and the Brave browser forum report videos displaying black screens for the typical duration of pre-roll ads before content begins playing. The video player simultaneously shows a pop-up ("Experiencing interruptions? Find out why") with a link directing users to a Google support page about disabling ad-blocking extensions, suggesting the slowdowns are intentional.

The recent crackdown is a shift from YouTube's previous tactics of simply displaying warning messages or blocking video playback entirely. The new approach inserts artificial delays that mirror the time you would spend watching advertisements, basically forcing the same annoying time investment, whether ads are blocked or not.

It looks like specific user accounts previously flagged for ad-blocking behavior are being targeted, potentially bypassing detection methods that extension developers typically use to counter YouTube's measures. PCWorld confirmed the behavior using uBlock Origin Lite, while Brave browser users report similar experiences despite the browser's built-in ad-blocking capabilities.

youtube-slowdown-ads.jpeg

Pop-up users see during delays (Image credit: PCWorld)

This latest move suggests YouTube is prepared to significantly degrade the user experience for non-paying users who refuse to view advertisements or subscribe to the $13.99 monthly YouTube Premium service, which offers an ad-free experience, offline downloads, and background playback.

For what it's worth, YouTube recently introduced a Premium Lite plan for $7.99/month that removes ads for most videos, excluding music content, Shorts, and when you search or browse.

Article Link: YouTube's Latest Move Against Ad Blockers: Video Delays

I'd gladly pay for ad-free and have had a subscription in the past. However, there's no way to pay and view anonymously. For example, I watch all sorts of videos and if I'm logged in (a prerequisite for getting the ad-free service I'm paying for), I don't necessarily want those videos to influence the YouTube suggestion algorithm nor inform what ads I'm served elsewhere. Without a doubt, my viewing history on YT gets reflected in ads serviced by Google Ads across the internet.

For example, a friend was thinking about getting a recreational vehicle (RV, caravan) and I was doing a little research to inform myself on them and whataknow- I see ads for RVs everywhere.
 
Big deal, I can still watch videos but no longer see an endless barrage of ugly ads or hear about how to poop. This company is shooting itself in the foot because there is nothing I’d pay them for now and I mean nothing. I don’t take surveys, don’t play Google Opinion Rewards, I’m done with how they do business and how they treat not only their content creators, but us viewers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fatboy71
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.