beat you to it![]()
Damn!
But I got you on the screen resolution. They're both 320x240.
How 'bout them, er, apples?
beat you to it![]()
Hahahaha!!! This is awesome!!! Apple is the Microsoft of the Music Biz![]()
Now nobody will use non-iPods because their afraid their MP3s won't play on a music player that isn't the iPod. It's too funny. It's just like the Mac-phobia that PC users have always had, except this time Apple is the 800-pound gorilla so the bias and misinformation are working in its favor.
For the record: The Zune plays MP3s, not to mention AAC and WMA files. It just can't play songs purchased from the iTunes store. There are very, very few people that have purchased 1000s of songs from the iTunes store. In fact, 22 songs have been sold on iTunes for every iPod sold. The vast majority of music people have in their iTunes collection are from ripping CDs or...other means...
Damn!![]()
But I got you on the screen resolution. They're both 320x240.
How 'bout them, er, apples?![]()
haha, looks like PlaysForSure doen't play for sure
Since Microsoft left their former PlaysForSure partners hang to dry I hope some of them retaliate by creating a Mac version of their software. I would love to have the full Rhapsody client for the Mac. Rhapsody really puts iTunes to shame, actually, not just in interface but in features.
The main Rhapsody feature is of course the ability to play subscription content. I would *love* to be able to have a music subscription on my Mac. $15/month for unlimited music? That's just nuts!!!
Also , Rhapsody has custom radio stations where you give it a playlist or list of artists, and it finds other artists/songs like it. Basically like Pandora, except that you can click on any song in your custom radio station and download it to your library within seconds.
Question for people out there: is there any *technical* reason preventing the PlaysForSure DRM from being ported to OS X? I realize that Microsoft may very well have license terms that will prevent this from ever actually happening, but I'm just wondering if there's any technical reason why Real couldn't write an OS X port of its sofware that would fully implement its DRM.
http://www.cnn.com/video/partners/clickability/index.html?url=/video/business/2006/11/14/sorkin.minding.your.business.cnn
Here is a little news piece from CNN's American Morning. The News people seem to gets whats wrong with the Zune.
Naive users buy iPods due to 'coolness' not because of the features otherwise Zen & Archos would rule - they don't.
McD
Umm no. My fist Apple purchase was my 60GB iPod photo. I didn't buy it for the cool factor. I didn't but it for the ease of use. I purchased it because it was the only music player in that form factor with a 60GB drive and integrated with the best jukebox software on the market. The iTunes/iPod integration is a VERY, VERY, VERY powerful reason why many go iPod. That isn't to say that there aren't some fashion trend lemmings out there.
You WANT subscription? Whenever you STOP paying the monthly fee...your entire library dissapears!!. What you are doing is simply renting the music.
The full line will finally be joined together like a beautiful Voltron episode.![]()
Check out the Today Show's "fair comparison" between the Zune and the 3G iPod!
http://www.jacksonlatka.com/blog/?p=60
You WANT subscription? Whenever you STOP paying the monthly fee...your entire library dissapears!!. What you are doing is simply renting the music.
they can't even make it a good brown...![]()
Umm...so? The value I get from music is from *listening* to it, not from *owning* it. I would much, much, much rather pay $15/month for unlimited music.
...snip for brevity...
It is sort of the question of owning a house verses renting a house. In the end, while there are some advantages to renting, there are much greater advantages to owning.
Check out the Today Show's "fair comparison" between the Zune and the 3G iPod!
http://www.jacksonlatka.com/blog/?p=60