I'm not sure if I'm affected by this issue or not. I'll test when I return to my Mac. I'm one of those that was not bitten by the first 10.2.8 or any other Apple software updates.
After some discussion on the Java developer list it looks like at least some of the systems that have had problems, happened to have Java applications running while the update ran. So it is possible that the running Java applications prevented a full update of the Java runtime and/or the Java shared archive.JRM PowerPod said:Just checked mine. All clear. I wonder why it affects some but not others
caccamolle said:CONCLUSION: Apple is making sure everyone will want to purchase TIGER. No other explanation.
PM FW 1.25 2x 1.25gig
Billicus said:Hmm... This is odd. I tried "java -version" and it returned without a segmentation fault, but I still have unexpected quits when I simply press OA - Q in Safari...Any ideas?
caccamolle said:10.3.7 rock, ROCK, solid
10.3.8 my mac would crash every third or fourth wake up from sleep
10.3.9 my mac crashes randomly. Worse than XP for sure.
Take a look at the Apple support site and you'll know I am not alone.
I usually don't do all updates, unless really need to. I went to 10.3.8 because I had read somewhere that it addressed network issues and I had noticed slow response accessing the web. So I went to 10.3.8 and wish I had never done it. Evidently since 10.3.8 was not stable it was a no brainer to try 10.3.9. And 10.3.9 for me is the worst OS I have had in a long long time.
CONCLUSION: Apple is making sure everyone will want to purchase TIGER. No other explanation.
PM FW 1.25 2x 1.25gig
Same here - I agree with your advice. It looks like I'm unaffected by this Java Glitch.hulugu said:Yeah, whatever dude.
10.3 - Stable on all 3 of my machines
10.3.7 - Stable on all 3 of my machines
10.3.8 - Stable on all 3 of my machines
10.3.9 - Stable on all 3 of my machines
If you're having problems at each update you might want to consider what haxies, freeware or shareware you are using because something is wrong. This latest screw-up by Apple is dumb, however don't start launching even dumber conspiracy theories. I always want to look for correlations, if you're having problems what programs are you running?
Who else is having problems and what programs or systems are you running?
This is just like the Firewire problem: intermittent and I think entirely over-reported because it was just scary enough for users.
Ditto, but I see your 3 systems and raise you 2 more systems and throw in one that started at 10.0 and has been updated to 10.3.9 without issue (didn't do clean or archive installs, no repair permissions, etc. just good old standard updates).hulugu said:Yeah, whatever dude.
10.3 - Stable on all 3 of my machines
10.3.7 - Stable on all 3 of my machines
10.3.8 - Stable on all 3 of my machines
10.3.9 - Stable on all 3 of my machines
Balin64 said:In any case, from this point on, they better have some lackie come up with hundreds of installations on various hardaware and spend a couple of days entering "java -version" into each one. Ha! Hell I would do that job is Apple paid me enough... and let me into the Chocolate Factory...
We are aware of an issue with Java applications possibly not running after installing 10.3.9 We are working to address this issue immediately. In the meantime a Kbase article at http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=301380 has been authored with a work around. Feel free to forward this URL to your customers until a permanent fix has been authored.
fps said:I think 10.3.9 was the last big update for Panther...
As an FYI Apple released at least 3 developer preview builds of Mac OS X 10.3.9 to developers starting as far back as the last week of March, including the very build that was released to the public. Interesting that no Java developers detected this issue since it would have likely affected them more directly then anyone else (they often have Java applications running for example).rowanhall said:it seemed like a bit of a rush job!
Not this again. Any update to Panther beyond 10.3.9 will be numbered 10.3.10 because that's the way software version numbers work. And that's that.IJ Reilly said:Well I hope so, or it's going to have to be called 10.3.9.1! (Is it an operating system or an IP number?)
wnurse said:Another problem i get is when i change the batteries in my bluetooth mouse, the mouse freezes. I have to reboot to get the services of my mouse. I hope and pray that one day, some version of OSX will solve that problem
shawnce said:As an FYI Apple released at least 3 developer preview builds of Mac OS X 10.3.9 to developers starting as far back as the last week of March, including the very build that was released to the public. Interesting that no Java developers detected this issue since it would have likely affected them more directly then anyone else (they often have Java applications running for example).