I agree they're milking us now for the 29W + usb-c cable.
I love the idea of fast charging, but what's best for the 10.5" batteries health and longevity?
Short of convinving evidence, it's hard to argue that what comes boxed with it, a 12W adapter, will not be it.
penajmz: When you mentioned 'it has been found that the iPad Pro is designed to be charged at 29W.' doesn't the same point apply? That is, it comes boxed with a 12W adapter?.. Just because a 29W *can* charge the device faster, does it mean it's better for the batteries life?
Post #11's sceenshot above mentioned the 1st gen 12.9" (more demanding than the 10.5), while playing Oceanhorn (a graphically intensive game) at full brightness, charged the device by 1.2%, so.. that's not discharging faster than the 12W can charge while in use, which I'd assume would be a higher percentage rate with the 10.5". I agree it's slow, but the great majority of user's do not use their device's consistently like this.
ABC5S: Cool, but would you agree that just because there's been no apparent issues from using the 29W, it may not be what's best still for the life of the battry?
Apparently the 29W charger outputs either 5.2V at 2.4A, or 14.5V at 2.0A. The 1st Gen 12.9, and both 2nd Gen Pro's, must be set to accept the 14.5V as their first choice, that's compelling, however.. What's best for our new 10.5" batteries still?