Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

10 Reasons to Wait for the iPhone 18 Pro

MacRumors

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster


Apple's iPhone development roadmap runs several years into the future and the company is continually working with suppliers on several successive iPhone models at the same time, which is why we often get rumored features months ahead of launch. The iPhone 18 series is no different, and we already have a good idea of what to expect for the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max.

Dynamic-Island-iPhone-18-Pro-Feature.jpg

One thing worth noting is that Apple is reportedly planning a major change to its iPhone release cycle this year, adopting a two-phase rollout starting with the iPhone 18 series. That means the iPhone 18 Pro, iPhone 18 Pro Max, and iPhone Fold will be released in September 2026, followed by the iPhone 18 and iPhone 18e in spring 2027.

Overall Design
iPhone 17 Pro Style
Rumors suggest the iPhone 18 Pro lineup will largely retain the same design as the iPhone 17 Pro models. The rear camera system will look identical to the current generation, featuring a raised "plateau" with three lenses arranged in a triangle. Display sizes are also expected to remain unchanged, with the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max continuing to use 6.3-inch and 6.9-inch panels, respectively – the same dimensions introduced with the iPhone 16 Pro series. iPhone 18 Pro models could drop the current two-tone look of the rear casing found on the iPhone 17 Pro in favor of a more seamless aesthetic. For the next-generation models, Apple has apparently updated the back-glass "replacement process" to minimize the color difference between the Ceramic Shield 2 glass and the aluminum frame, resulting in a more unified appearance.

Next-Level Battery Life
Thicker Chassis
The iPhone 18 Pro Max will feature a bigger battery for continued best-in-class battery life, claims a Chinese leaker. The Weibo user known as "Digital Chat Station" said that the ‌iPhone 18‌ Pro Max will have a battery capacity of 5,100 to 5,200 mAh. (The iPhone 17 Pro Max has the biggest ‌iPhone‌ battery to date at 5,088 mAh. Apple says it has a battery life of up to 39 hours.) According to another rumor, the body of the iPhone 18 Pro Max will be slightly thicker than the iPhone 17 Pro Max, raising the device's weight to around 243 grams. That would make the iPhone 18 Pro Max approximately 3 grams more than the iPhone 14 Pro Max, which is currently the heaviest model Apple has produced. A larger battery is the most likely cause.

Smaller Dynamic Island
Under-Screen Face ID?
Rumors continue to circulate about whether the iPhone 18 Pro models will introduce under-display Face ID, but reports remain divided on when the technology will actually arrive. The feature would move the TrueDepth camera system beneath the display, eliminating the need for the current Dynamic Island cutout.

According to Wayne Ma of The Information, Apple is targeting a design without a Dynamic Island, replacing it with a single pinhole camera in the upper-left corner of the screen. However, other sources dispute that claim. Display analyst Ross Young believes under-display Face ID is possible for the iPhone 18 Pro, but says a smaller Dynamic Island will still be present. Bloomberg's Mark Gurman has echoed this view, reporting that the new models will feature a slimmed-down Dynamic Island rather than removing it entirely. Apple is also said to be testing new camera miniaturization technology to reduce the size of the front-facing camera currently located within the Dynamic Island.

The Weibo leaker "Ice Universe" has claimed the Dynamic Island cutout on the iPhone 18 Pro models will be approximately 35% narrower than it is on the iPhone 17 Pro models. Specifically, they said it will have a width of around 13.5mm, down from around 20.7mm

Meanwhile, Chinese leaker Instant Digital has offered yet another version of events, saying the Dynamic Island will shrink in size, but that under-display Face ID and camera technology won't debut this year. The latest word on the subject is that Apple is weighing two options for the iPhone 18 Pro's Dynamic Island, and a final decision has yet to be made. One option apparently retains the existing screen mold from the iPhone 17 Pro, while the other introduces a significantly smaller "Mini ‌Dynamic Island‌" enabled by moving the Face ID receiver and transmitter components beneath the display.

A20 Pro Chip
2nm Process
The iPhone 18 Pro models will use Apple's A20 chip, based on TSMC's 2nm process for power and efficiency improvements. A move to 2nm fabrication increases transistor density, which will enable higher performance. The A20 series is expected to deliver roughly a 15 percent speed gain and about 30 percent better efficiency compared with the A19 series used in Apple's iPhone 17 models.

Apple's A20 chip will be packaged with TSMC's Wafer-Level Multi-Chip Module (WMCM) technology, suggesting at least some A20 chips will have RAM integrated directly onto the same wafer as the CPU, GPU, and Neural Engine, rather than sitting adjacent to the chip and connected via a silicon interposer. This could contribute to faster performance for both overall tasks and... Click here to read rest of article

Article Link: 10 Reasons to Wait for the iPhone 18 Pro
 
Article Link
https://www.macrumors.com/2026/04/14/reasons-to-wait-iphone-18-pro-2/
  • Haha
Reactions: Z-4195
I know these kinds of articles have to explain concepts simply, but the variable aperture described as "enabling sharper focus on subjects or smoother background blur" will of course do neither.

It won't offer a 'smoother background blur' as the maximum aperture would be the same as the current fixed one, so it'll in fact offer exactly the same smoothness of background blur.

And the aperture doesn't affect the focus point or its 'sharpness' but merely how deep the focus point is. While interesting (and I'm a photographer so all of this stuff is interesting), limiting the depth of field is what everyone strives for, including faking this in software such as 'Portrait mode'. The depth of field is already very deep as it's a small sensor (hence the need to fake the opposite in software), so this feature – while interesting – isn't really of any practical use that I can think of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dj64Mk7, sos47, Farragutful and 2 others
Zeus2018 said:
I’m not sure why Apple believes it’s a good idea to make the Pro models thicker and heavier with every new release.
Click to expand...
I disagree. I would suggest that 0.1% of buyers are overly concerned with weight, maybe 2 or 3% are concerned with thickness, and 99.9% are concerned by battery life.

I'm never sure why Apple and others don't just make them 50% thicker and heavier and solve the one, real, outstanding issue of modern phones.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: scgf, Chidoro, Huck and 2 others
Station Grey said:
I disagree. I would suggest that 0.1% of buyers are overly concerned with weight, maybe 2 or 3% are concerned with thickness, and 99.9% are concerned by battery life.

I'm never sure why Apple and others don't just make them 50% thicker and heavier and solve the one, real, outstanding issue of modern phones.
Click to expand...

Few want a phone that heavy. It'll pull down your pants or weigh down whatever pockets you're using.

No thank you.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Haha
Reactions: mickcordero, Chidoro, Huck and 4 others
WarmWinterHat said:
Few want a phone that heavy. It'll pull down your pants or weigh down whatever pockets you're using.

No thank you.
Click to expand...
🤷‍♂️

Fair enough, but I know I wouldn't notice an extra 50-100g in any way at all. It would certainly have no effect on my jeans!

Perhaps if you wear jogging pants or something loose with no belt then there's such a thing as too heavy, but I'm still not convinced that it'd be an issue with a chunkier phone. And if that was the tradeoff for a guaranteed 2-day battery life then I still feel most people would choose it.

But anyway, it's not like there isn't an iPhone Air option these days that specifically targets thinness/light weight at the expense of battery life for people that are scared of belts 🙂 Hence, presumably, why Apple feel comfortable increasing weight/thickness in their premium models.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chidoro, Farragutful and WarmWinterHat
Zeus2018 said:
I’m not sure why Apple believes it’s a good idea to make the Pro models thicker and heavier with every new release.
Click to expand...
I don't mind the thickness too much, but the weight - even of the non-Max Pro - can be an annoyance.

In hindsight I should've probably gone with the iPhone Air instead of the 17 Pro. Thought I'd miss the ultrawide lens too much, but in reality the main lens takes so much better photos that I avoid using the ultrawide whenever possible.
 
If the rumoured iPhone Ultra/Fold only had two rear cameras vice three it may suffer a similar fate as the iPhone Air. If competitors are able to fit three rear cameras why not innovative Apple.

If this is the case I may either keep my iPhone 16 Pro and not upgrade or get an iPhone Ultra as well, let’s see.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back