I’d have to respectfully kind of disagree with
@Gix1k and
@Ralfi - how’s that for weaseling words, lol. Or at least I’d like to add another perspective to those comments related to posted reviews.
I’ve been an amateur photographer most of my life - 35mm, medium format, large format, a Leica once (didn’t ‘click’ with me), and digital from day one.
The Max 12 camera shows marked improvement in low light, and that’s exactly when many of the best images, at least outdoors, are made - the so-called ‘golden hour’. This is not a small thing. The improvement in night photography due to the lager sensor should be evident too.
The larger sensor pixels -> less noise will help make larger prints too, if that’s your output.
That there is not much difference in ideal conditions is unsurprising and should not be expected. It’s been difficult to tell the image quality apart from digital cameras, phones or compact digital, under ideal conditions for some time now. And one review said that under good conditions the differences between the Max, Pro, and the Pixel and Samsung flagships was not large. Expected, but there was a marked difference in low light conditions with the Max readily topping other cameras.
I’ll repeat myself WRT the reviews just to be clear - this is not a small improvement, it’s big.
The focal length changes in the Max camera are welcome too, I’m looking forward to the longer ‘telephoto’.