If you could choose one, what would you have: discrete graphics or quad core processing?
On board Intel 4000 graphics driving a retina display?
Personally, I'd go for the discrete graphics. It would seriously aid the performance of many intense apps, especially games, and relieve the CPU.
One has to wonder what that means. Maybe a move away from Lithium Ion batteries. I mean really there is nothing unprecedented about a wound up Lithium polymer battery that can basically take any form, so maybe something new is about to emerge.
At least the wait is only a week now. Still no Mini rumors though which sucks.
On board Intel 4000 graphics driving a retina display?
Easily without a sweat.. Unless you're animator at Pixar, you'll be fine
----------
Buy a console for gaming
Apple's suppliers have been dropping the ball. I don't want to know about the product before Apple announces it. Somebody fix this.
These are not "rumors" but rather leaks. This site is not called MacLeaks now is it?Yeah, me neither. Wait, what am I doing on a MacRumors forum again?
Easily without a sweat.. Unless you're animator at Pixar, you'll be fine
If you could choose one, what would you have: discrete graphics or quad core processing?
Insert Steve and never allowing this joke here.
Except for once it's true.
On board Intel 4000 graphics driving a retina display?
Scarry
Discrete graphics, no question.
Except it's not, because Tim Cook was COO before CEO. He dealt with suppliers.
As Apple continues to rise in popularity, there will be more leaks because there will be more of a demand for them (as well as opportunity, as the amount of suppliers/production ramp-ups will grow). it doesn't have to do with a failing on Cook's part.
Yeah, you know like on the current rMBP. Only with fewer pixels.
Maybe you meant the same thing, but they moved to Li-Po years ago in the laptops.
I would think we would have heard about truly new tech by now. So I say it's just more marketing-speak.
Yeah I can't help but feel this may be a better product in a year or two. Discrete really seems like a must.
Well since the 15" rMBPs integrated graphics is having trouble driving it's screens resolution then this will probably have the same problem, so you definitely don't need to be a Pixar animator to need that.
The integrated graphics in the current rMBP definitely struggles to drive all those pixels at times. I know I'm not the only one to notice it. Several podcasters on 5by5.tv have said the same. So if integrated is your only option with this, good luck.![]()
It's no different than driving the 27" Thunderbolt display, as the resolution of 2560x1600 is the max the hardware scalar can do before you have to involve slower software algorithms to deal with anything higher
The integrated graphics in the current rMBP definitely struggles to drive all those pixels at times. I know I'm not the only one to notice it. Several podcasters on 5by5.tv have said the same. So if integrated is your only option with this, good luck.![]()
iMac Please!
Thing is the current rMBP is a lot higher resolution than the 13" is likely to be. The integrated graphics seems to have no problem with 28" TB display which is the same resolution that is being talked about for rMBP 13".
Don't visit a rumors forum.
That is probably one of the stupidest comments I have ever read. On a rumors forums complaining that you don't want to know rumors about an upcoming product. Come on!
Apple's suppliers have been dropping the ball. I don't want to know about the product before Apple announces it. Somebody fix this.
Not having discrete graphics could be a letdown.