imac pro is a bit too cheap, should start at $9999
Makes a £4000 fully loaded 'iMac amateur' look cheap
imac pro is a bit too cheap, should start at $9999
Remember when we looked at the $2,999 Mac Pro and were like “whoa”...imac pro is a bit too cheap, should start at $9999
I’m sure there will be an iMac update next year. I think a 6-core 8700K should be available, but I don’t think many others changes are on deck. It can be configured with an i7-7700K, 64GB RAM, 2 TB SSD... already a beast![]()
Remember when we looked at the $2,999 Mac Pro and were like “whoa”...
Seems quaint now...
Seems like the second email made it abundantly clear what was going on.
Update: Some customers who received emails letting them know their orders will arrive early have received second emails informing them that the original emails were sent accidentally, so it is not clear if 14 and 18-core iMac Pro orders are indeed going to be arriving early.
Article Link: 14 and 18-Core iMac Pros May Arrive Sooner Than Expected [Updated]
Every Apple product should come in this color.im hoping the non iMac pros come in this color, its very nice looking.
What Apple still doesn't get is that no Pro user wants a non-upgradeable machine and this one enforces their arrogance and desire to enforce this concept on consumers.
FEW PRO USERS WILL BUY A PRO MACHINE WHERE YOU CANNOT UPGRADE THE MEMORY WITHOUT VIOLATING THE WARRANTY! AT ANY PRICE!
Yes, a sizable percentage of these will end up on the desks of the privileged, non-productive few as a trophy. I've seen it with every overpriced boutique design Apple has concocted (except the cheese graters, too much "function over form" for most dilettantes).
one might want to lower it as wellThanks for clarifying. I had no idea!
Only a very tall person would need to raise an iMac, or any large display for that matter. Setting one’s desk and chair at the proper height would probably elimate almost any need to raise a monitor. I’ve bought a lot of monitors and I don’t remember any with height adjustment.
I remember the Mac IIfx starting at $9K. With 4 MB of ram, 40 MHz cpu, and 1.4 MB superdrive. That would be $17K in today's dollars, considering inflation.
All things considered, the iMac Pro is an excellent value.
iMac is so 2007 why do they still make it? Such a waste of money for the specs... can't even upgrade them either!
What % of people do you guys think will buy this who will never do anything more than surf the web? I would be really curious to see those numbers.
"Shiny Things" Alert. Who buys a computer based on color?
[doublepost=1513927180][/doublepost]
Until Apple makes it deliberately slower in 2018 just before the Modular Mac Pro comes out.![]()
No... What it really means is you appreciate outstanding performance, loads of flexible I/O, a great display, and the means (i.e. a decent job) to pay for it. That it also looks nice is just icing. Nothing wrong with that!
Right well I just spent £2700 - vat of my company's money on a new Apple laptop. Had to cos software and hassle of switching to Win 10.
But I was ripped off by Apple, we all know it. A similar price Win PC gets you so much more.
But the new iMac is the straw that broke the camels back. Its the iMac ( without the additional cores ) that their normal customers should be getting, given the price.
And the fact that its taken them this long to come up with something that if expanded matches the current level professional PC build, but for twice the price.
For that price you could get a 18 Core + 2 x 1080Ti + 128 GB Memory + 2 x M.2 + Ultrawide Screen + everything else and still have money to spare.
I wonder what applications fully support such a CPU Power. Many Pro apps are gone or unusable. Final Cut Pro is the only one I can think of, but for that macbook pro is perfect too.
Games do not exist, so I guess Mail, Itunes, Ibooks will show the speed.
would benefit, but you know that Autocad, Vectorworks, Archicad run just fine on basic imac and in my case macbook pro performs well.Programs such as MatLab, AutoCAD, Logic, Maschine, Resolve, Twin-Motion, Archicad, Maya, Cinema 4D, etc, just as a few examples, would benefit, along with many others that involve, among other aspects, design, analysis, modeling, processing, animation, AR, and rendering.
would benefit, but you know that Autocad, Vectorworks, Archicad run just fine on basic imac and in my case macbook pro performs well.
Then it's not for you. Not sure what you're getting at, since 'in my case' completely disqualifies other use cases where the core count saves hours of work over a period of time.would benefit, but you know that Autocad, Vectorworks, Archicad run just fine on basic imac and in my case macbook pro performs well.
Apparently you did have no idea, you can take that up with the women I work with, who range in height from 4'11" to 6' 1".Thanks for clarifying. I had no idea!
Only a very tall person would need to raise an iMac, or any large display for that matter. Setting one’s desk and chair at the proper height would probably elimate almost any need to raise a monitor. I’ve bought a lot of monitors and I don’t remember any with height adjustment.
Programs such as MatLab, AutoCAD, Logic, Maschine, Resolve, Twin-Motion, Archicad, Maya, Cinema 4D, etc, just as a few examples, would benefit, along with many others that involve, among other aspects, design, analysis, modeling, processing, animation, AR, and rendering.
would benefit, but you know that Autocad, Vectorworks, Archicad run just fine on basic imac and in my case macbook pro performs well.