Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I did not know that. Sounds promising!

"The Coffee Lake chips feature more cores, with Intel introducing a 4-core Core i3, a 6-core Core i5, and a 6-core Core i7 with hyperthreading. Intel says its new chips are up to 32 percent faster compared to previous-generation chips."

I’m sure there will be an iMac update next year. I think a 6-core 8700K should be available, but I don’t think many others changes are on deck. It can be configured with an i7-7700K, 64GB RAM, 2 TB SSD... already a beast :)
 
Remember when we looked at the $2,999 Mac Pro and were like “whoa”...

Seems quaint now...

I remember the Mac IIfx starting at $9K. With 4 MB of ram, 40 MHz cpu, and 1.4 MB superdrive. That would be $17K in today's dollars, considering inflation.

All things considered, the iMac Pro is an excellent value.
 
What Apple still doesn't get is that no Pro user wants a non-upgradeable machine and this one enforces their arrogance and desire to enforce this concept on consumers.
FEW PRO USERS WILL BUY A PRO MACHINE WHERE YOU CANNOT UPGRADE THE MEMORY WITHOUT VIOLATING THE WARRANTY! AT ANY PRICE!

You are so off the mark. Lots of pros never open their machines. knock it off with the caps and bold text.
[doublepost=1514161816][/doublepost]
Yes, a sizable percentage of these will end up on the desks of the privileged, non-productive few as a trophy. I've seen it with every overpriced boutique design Apple has concocted (except the cheese graters, too much "function over form" for most dilettantes).


Hyperbole. As much as I hate my 2017 tbMBP, if I had the money id buy an iMac today - I typical y change my primary machine every 2-3 years regardless.
[doublepost=1514162122][/doublepost]
Thanks for clarifying. I had no idea!

Only a very tall person would need to raise an iMac, or any large display for that matter. Setting one’s desk and chair at the proper height would probably elimate almost any need to raise a monitor. I’ve bought a lot of monitors and I don’t remember any with height adjustment.
one might want to lower it as well ;)
 
I remember the Mac IIfx starting at $9K. With 4 MB of ram, 40 MHz cpu, and 1.4 MB superdrive. That would be $17K in today's dollars, considering inflation.

All things considered, the iMac Pro is an excellent value.

I remember the IIfx, my college had one, that was an amazing machine. I had a Iici around the same time, still my favorite Mac. The new iMac Pro is the fastest Mac ever, I hope Apple plans to broaden their lineup with mid-range (i5s + i7s) and higher end Pro machines (Titan Graphics level) as well. But today is a good day, you can buy a serious Mac again and it will help a lot of people get great work done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: citysnaps
What % of people do you guys think will buy this who will never do anything more than surf the web? I would be really curious to see those numbers.
 
No... What it really means is you appreciate outstanding performance, loads of flexible I/O, a great display, and the means (i.e. a decent job) to pay for it. That it also looks nice is just icing. Nothing wrong with that!

While I agree I think the post you quoted made sense - otherwise it wouldn't be an exclusive colour for the Pro line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Larry-K
Right well I just spent £2700 - vat of my company's money on a new Apple laptop. Had to cos software and hassle of switching to Win 10.

But I was ripped off by Apple, we all know it. A similar price Win PC gets you so much more.

But the new iMac is the straw that broke the camels back. Its the iMac ( without the additional cores ) that their normal customers should be getting, given the price.

And the fact that its taken them this long to come up with something that if expanded matches the current level professional PC build, but for twice the price.

For that price you could get a 18 Core + 2 x 1080Ti + 128 GB Memory + 2 x M.2 + Ultrawide Screen + everything else and still have money to spare.

And which major manufacture are you referring to that makes this? I thought Dell was selling their comprable monitor for $5000.
 
I wonder what applications fully support such a CPU Power. Many Pro apps are gone or unusable. Final Cut Pro is the only one I can think of, but for that macbook pro is perfect too.
Games do not exist, so I guess Mail, Itunes, Ibooks will show the speed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stevekr
I wonder what applications fully support such a CPU Power. Many Pro apps are gone or unusable. Final Cut Pro is the only one I can think of, but for that macbook pro is perfect too.
Games do not exist, so I guess Mail, Itunes, Ibooks will show the speed.

Programs such as MatLab, AutoCAD, Logic, Maschine, Resolve, Twin-Motion, Archicad, Maya, Cinema 4D, etc, just as a few examples, would benefit, along with many others that involve, among other aspects, design, analysis, modeling, processing, animation, AR, and rendering.
 
Programs such as MatLab, AutoCAD, Logic, Maschine, Resolve, Twin-Motion, Archicad, Maya, Cinema 4D, etc, just as a few examples, would benefit, along with many others that involve, among other aspects, design, analysis, modeling, processing, animation, AR, and rendering.
would benefit, but you know that Autocad, Vectorworks, Archicad run just fine on basic imac and in my case macbook pro performs well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xnu
would benefit, but you know that Autocad, Vectorworks, Archicad run just fine on basic imac and in my case macbook pro performs well.
Then it's not for you. Not sure what you're getting at, since 'in my case' completely disqualifies other use cases where the core count saves hours of work over a period of time.

There will ALWAYS be a need for more powerful machines, to think otherwise is absurd.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xnu
Thanks for clarifying. I had no idea!

Only a very tall person would need to raise an iMac, or any large display for that matter. Setting one’s desk and chair at the proper height would probably elimate almost any need to raise a monitor. I’ve bought a lot of monitors and I don’t remember any with height adjustment.
Apparently you did have no idea, you can take that up with the women I work with, who range in height from 4'11" to 6' 1".

If you've never bought adjustable monitors, you probably haven't bought very good ones. I've got Eizos and NECs top of the line models, and they're fully adjustable, as commercial quality products should be.

Just because Apple's too lazy to do things properly doesn't mean everybody else is, as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stevekr
Programs such as MatLab, AutoCAD, Logic, Maschine, Resolve, Twin-Motion, Archicad, Maya, Cinema 4D, etc, just as a few examples, would benefit, along with many others that involve, among other aspects, design, analysis, modeling, processing, animation, AR, and rendering.

Actually AutoCad and Vectorworks don't benefit much from Multi-core Processors, only a few of their features can utilize that power. Archicad is not fully multi-threaded either, but does take advantage of more cores.

"Due to the lack of multi-threading, AutoCAD is not capable of using more than 50% of the CPU on a dual-core computer, so there is no significant performance gain over a single CPU computer, except for the areas noted above."

https://knowledge.autodesk.com/supp...t-for-multi-core-processors-with-AutoCAD.html

would benefit, but you know that Autocad, Vectorworks, Archicad run just fine on basic imac and in my case macbook pro performs well.

That is why CAD software can utilize i7s quite nicely. Though the thermal constraints of the typical iMac can be quite problematic. I purchased 12 iMacs one year for the firm and 10 of ten died multiple times from heat, that is why we always try to only replace up to 1/3 of computers in any given year to avoid complete disruption which that causes. We did adopt the 2013 Mac Pros and they have worked quite well but they are 4 years old and need to be replaced shortly.

The ECC memory is not of particular benefit for those applications either. The iMac Pro 27" monitor is very nice, but most of our workstations are (3) 30" monitors usually 16:10 but some 16:9 monitors.

I am an architect and in charge of purchasing the computers for our firm. We utilize a lot of different software other than just CAD. Editing video and 3d rendering lead us to Mac Pro 2013, not the CAD software. We also use each workstation for a lot of photo editing, desktop publishing, keynote presentations, excel, numbers, word, scheduling software, and accounting software. Not to mention, mail, messages and iTunes, so we typically always have 6-10 applications open at any one time.

Unfortunately I can't justify buying a computer attached to monitor unless it fits in my bag to go home with me and we have iPad Pros for that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: citysnaps
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.